so i see a lot of people complain about zone attacks, and i was wondering. do we really even need them??
they are actually really crap at hitting multiple people when surrounded. and well that was their original purpose they are almost never used for that (again cause they don't really work well for that) instead they are used quick kinda cheap attack in duels instead.
now i admit i play Lawbringer, Conq, Warden and Zerker. so only one of the characters i play has a good zone. but i would be happy to see them go. on warden i could live without it.
just wondering what people think. i wouldn't mind if they were removed.
They probably should never be cancel-able. And also shouldn't come out faster than a light attack. Or, if they do, the first hit should deal basically no damage but only clear people back.
The main problem with them is people using them as a way to perform a light attack out of stance.
Of course, it's one of the few 'guarantee' options in the game right now, which is why people are using it in such a jank way.
Pretty much this.Originally Posted by Alchemist-21- Go to original post
Sometimes I use this attack with the Kensei when I'm surrounded by the puny soldiers, otherwise I simply rely on the heavy attack.
yeah thats kinda what i was getting at, they are not being used for what they are meant for, and more being abused because of the way they work. but since they aren't even that great at what they were intended for. i don't think they are needed. and i can't see ubi changing them to stop them being abusedOriginally Posted by PlagueGripes Go to original post