The playerbase of For Honor is becoming so cheesy and dirty... Cheap tactics to win. | Forums

[Captain-Courage]

Gray, really, you are a troll, disappear from my thread or get ignored. I wont read your bullsh1t since you wrote without even reading at all.

Who would ever want to read you when you start your post with this ?

Im here to talk about the sh1t that the players are becoming in this videogame, about their way to do anything to win, even if it's nasty.

Edit and PS : To be honest, sometimes I'd really like to see the "Honor" or "No cheap tactics" guys' faces when they play a 20 vs 20 objective mode in Chivalry MW or a Siege in Mount and Blade ...

[buhahh125]

Stick with 1v1 and 2v2's? I know it has been said time and time again but that Is the reality of the matter. I may not agree with it but that is how it is. I have a Prestige 8 and then 4 Prestige 2's. The bottom line Is, I do enjoy the game and if I play those modes I have to go into it knowing that is a possibility. I would prefer to play "honorably" but that is only my opinion and not that of everyone. Real life is not always what you want it to be so whatever the situation go into it with the expectations of what is currently happening. Or if it is too much to handle and for some reason you can not or do not like to play 1v1 or 2v2's, where it is less likely happening, then play something different. SORRY!

[MrForz]

The player base has been "cheesy and dirty" for a while. I manage to soldier through said tactics with possibly one of the worst classes at the moment, just like you do.

I feel awesome being able to pull that off since it means that there are good chances to come on top in reasonable circumstances through said cheese and thus, get the frequency of cheap tactics to fade away in time. At the same time I feel a slight bit of disgust for the playerbase for a good 5 seconds afterwards before shrugging it off.
But you, you complain about it and with a fiery temper too. If you were just "tired" of it I believe you wouldn't show such a level of aggressivity. Could it be that Gray360UK is right after all?

Also, why do you prefer 4vs4s to 2vs2 and 1vs1 if you want to fight and stuff?

[buhahh125]

Who would ever want to read you when you start your post with this ?



Edit and PS : To be honest, sometimes I'd really like to see the "Honor" or "No cheap tactics" guys' faces when they play a 20 vs 20 objective mode in Chivalry MW or a Siege in Mount and Blade ...

LOL that is funny.

[WoodDaGawd]

Or you could just play 1v1 and stop the crying.

[itsPlanB]

Million Dollar Question

Also, why do you prefer 4vs4s to 2vs2 and 1vs1 if you want to fight and stuff?

[NeoLocutus]

PD: What is a Testudo formation? I really need to know that.

This is a Testudo



The way they shield bash you out of the buff zone reminded me of the Roman Testudo (that's why I called it a "weird form")

Edit: "Testudo" is a latin term that means "turtle", they called it like this because Roman soldiers put their shields in a way that remembers a turtle's shell :-)

[Capoupacap]

Mister enemy, please, shoot first ...

[itsPlanB]

What!? Someone actually understands the concept of the game modes. It's astonishing. I'm not the only one regurgitating the same thing. LOVE THIS!

Look, i believe it's best for everyone's sanity that we should take the mode indicator literally. Like 2vs2 is not 1vs1 times 2, or 4vs4 is 1vs1 times 4. No, only in duel 1vs1 is strictly a duel between 2. The rest are all-out brawl. Hold nothing back, the goal is the other team flat on the ground. Its just that simple.
Of course an uncoordinated team full of mentally challenged individuals wont do well, just build up revenge and wipe them off.
This may be a bit off topic but i have observed some high-leveled players switch lock continuously just to block and parry. Why the hell would u disorient yourself like that? U can parry side heavy from a side opponent without the need to switch lock. imo, this make 1vsMany intolerable and usually result in defeat for the lone fighter

[Alustar.exe]

So, just to throw this out there, the OP mentioned something I think is possibly the most crippling part of their argument. The simple fact you have issues with individuals who disengage to heal up is flawed.
Let's set aside the fact (a simple one that most have mentioned) that you are complaining about mechanics available to anyone, and focus on how you play the game.
If you, yourself, aren't managing your own stat pools and making sure you aren't caught off guard in a team match, then I think it's you with the problem.
Lastly, your stats aren't much better than my own, and I don't consider myself anywhere near top tier. Hell bottom average at best.
The fault is that most people assume what is valid in combat, and anything dune outside of that is a cheap trick. Not everyone is going to have that same view.

On a related side note, I'd like to add this: I've played many different games reading back as far as I can remember. The thing that stick out to me was I wanted a game that gave me many options. And in know in not alone in this.
The various options for throwing and moving my opponent. Different ways to attack and mitigate damage. This game offers that. Are you offensive or defensive?
Well you be reactive and turn attacks back, or be proactive and force your opponent to react to you? Well you run with a group and team up, our run solo and augment them when able? So many variables.