Hi, I know that you cannot confirm the next two DLC characters for the game, but I wanted to point out that the Ninja makes sense with the era, but a early Roman/Greek warrior like a Centurion does not fit at all with this games era (If that is what it will be called in the actual release). Why not go with late Roman Empire warrior-> Eastern Greek Orthodox Byzantine Empire warrior? There were plenty of unique warriors with armor that evolved from early Roman/Greek armor. I hope that you guys have a legitimate way of explaining a Centurion in the Middle Ages. Please consider starting the armor off early Greek/Roman (muscle armor) and then higher level armor evolves to Byzantine armor (armor plated or scale) so that it makes sense at least. Like the warrior had crumbling ancient armor and then higher level obtained proper armor of the time. Please reassure us that you will maintain the integrity of the theme and quality of story. It means a lot to us! :-)
P.S. Please no Roman/Greek Helmet Plumes! It makes no sense to have that ancient helmet in the Middle Ages!
Two things.
1. Where is the leaked information at?
2. I don't care about the quality of the story one single bit so stop speaking for me by saying it matters to "Us." It matters to some of us. Not all of us.
Originally Posted by N_Kurek Go to original post
It's most likely fake or assets that were not removed. Honestly, a Centurion is pretty generic and Ninjas are not even part of the Samurai culture. If anything we will probably get 2 additional hybrids per faction similar to how Mass Effect worked (3 primary & 3 hybrid classes). So expect a Vanguard/Heavy (Lawbringer), Vanguard/Assassin (Nobushi), & Heavy/Assassin (Valkyrie) to fill in the remaining 6 classes.
I agree......that you should remove "us" from your opinion.Originally Posted by N_Kurek Go to original post
Personally, I think we're all set with the heroes we have and don't need new ones. But...
You're saying a game that mixes the viking era with the age of chivalry AND feudal Japan has no business bringing ancient Romans into the mix? Are there standards and practices for historical fantasy that I'm unaware of?
why thoes screens are i 2 languages? char discripttion is in eng rest in ger? fake?Originally Posted by Natsaru Go to original post
The Vikings, Samurai, and knights all existed at the same time in history. around 11th-15th centuries. The Romans existed from like 400BC to 15th century, but the west Roman Empire (the only time the Centurions existed) existed up until around the 1st century. The East Roman Byzantine Greek Orthodox Empire existed after the Roman Empire up until the 15th century, so the Centurions and their heroic Greek/muscle armor was loonnnng gone. Thats what silly. Every other army existed in the same era, just at different locations in the world.
And the "us" in the my previous post still stands. There are people i have talked to that feel the same about the Centurion class, so "us" still applies. You dont have to be apart of the group, I am not speaking about you people that dont care about this.
I agree, it looks fake and the characters look.. overdone compared to the other models. but maybe we'll be wrong, who knowsOriginally Posted by Hiero_Glyph Go to original post![]()