A few of us do, yep.Originally Posted by Iunatic Go to original post
Saying a game is repetitive is pointless as every game ever made is repetitive, COD and BF
games are repetitive as hell and yet they seem to get scores of 90+ and 9/10.
Pac-man was repetitive and yet is is classed as one of the best arcade games ever made.
Repetitiveness is part of gaming it's what draws us in, Time for Reviewers and gamers to get over it
or make their own game that has zero repetitiveness.
Reviews take with a pinch of Salt like film critics. I gave up watching any YouTube gamers reviews most shout get to hyped dont know what their doing!
A. because they mainly playing consoles
B. They rush the game through wait for the Mediocre Mass Effect or what other kids shooters like COD pops up!
I just took a look at Mass Effect to me that looks like Halo generic copy shooter so many people have views on games comparing. Guess some just want a fill gap but the real fans will stay suited to what they like and forget the negative comments
I dont agreed with this BigFryTV guy.
I only played the BETA, but this "review" is just another random youtuber video: He is playing on low difficulty settings, and just rush forward, skip every sidestuff. My friend played the Open Beta a lot, and he accomplished the two areas, and it was 15 hours for him.
Its pointles to play a Ghost Recon game like he played Wildlands. Got the copy, play the main missions on easy or normal (in a Ghost Recon game? really?) and thats it, over, give me the next free copy.
Exactly, I got 20+ hours from the open beta. Sure I replayed a lot of missions with friends who hadn't completed them but it was fun every single time! Because it's different! Everytime you go in something different will happen. I think people who played a lot of ArmA will understand this, because in ArmA you got your base and you go clear the same towns and cities everyday with slightly different objectives but it's always fun because it's unpredictable!Originally Posted by T1Rabbit Go to original post