55% Steam Rating | Forums

[CoyoteXStarrk]

Man it sure is a good thing I'm not a sheep and base all my opinions on what everyone else thinks.



OP is the kind of person who gets hyped for a movie from the trailers and then doesn't go see it because someone gave it a bad review lol

[JayyRupp]

Hope you're proud of yourselves, Ubi.There's no coming back from a rating like that in week two. For Honor is the new BattleBorn.

Steam and PC gaming in general is flooded with salty tweenage trolls. Why are you taking stock in the most unreliable rating system on the Internet? Better yet....why do you care? If it was scored at 100% would you magically love the game? The only people I've seen give FH low scores are the casual shooter plebs. They didn't realize they were buying a fighting game and became intimidated by the learning curve. I'm guessing you fall into that category.

#Therewasafreebeta
Idiot.

[Varicose_Veins]

It's a very bad stat for this game because more than half of the overall sales are from Steam.

Having said that, For Honor has topped the sales in the UK and Japan in the last week.

[Krucifixt]

There have been some choices ubi made that has ruined the game for me a bit. I do love the game, and I do play it, but I can understand exactly why it has mixed/negative reviews. The reason I can't defend them is all of these issues were brought to their attention through alphas and beta, yet they ignored it and released anyways. Why do these things if you wont take advice??
Also, the price of this game is pretty high, then the season pass, then micro-transactions with slow steel earnings in game. If they worked a little more on connectivity issues, and increased earnings per game, I think my gripes would be demolished. I hope they follow suit to how they did R6S purchases. You get roughly 100-150 per game with similar cosmetic options/prices in shop, the actual upgrades per operator are very cheap, instead of this RNG bull they added in FH. The micro-trans in R6S can only get you cosmetic stuff, where as FH people can actually buy gear, for me that's a huge no. Even if it doesn't help in duel, even with its limits, its still not a good thing. All that being said I'm not going to stop playing, but it has ruined the original image and hope that I had for the game.

[Fx2050]

that rating is flawed as most on steam. game is good and i dont really find many issues and you cannot knock its fighting and style

[Waynedetta40k]

that rating is flawed as most on steam. game is good and i dont really find many issues and you cannot knock its fighting and style

Its not "flawed" its just opinions from customers.
I will take a break and see how it goes but my time is more worth than a geargrind to actually get and enjoyable experience in more than a half of the game modes.
1v1 and 2v2 is already quite boring with no variety.
It was my first Ubi game I bought and I learned my lesson.

[Arkhos1988]

Well a rating of 55% might not be aproved by everyone, but considering that p2p causes a lot of isues, that the chars don't feel balanced and guardbreak still seems broken a lot of the time and on top of that the matchmaking is not even existing to make fair and balanced teams, while the bots are useless if you ahve them in your team... Well i just can say that the rating could be a lot worse for AAA-title.
A lot of this is due to that AAA-price, again ubi shows that on release their games tend to have issues which would be fine in open beta for 10-20€ but on a decleared finished game, well, are you still amazed by this?

[Bracus_Maximus]

Its not "flawed" its just opinions from customers.
I will take a break and see how it goes but my time is more worth than a geargrind to actually get and enjoyable experience in more than a half of the game modes.
1v1 and 2v2 is already quite boring with no variety.
It was my first Ubi game I bought and I learned my lesson.

Geargrind.... in this game? Lol

Everyone and their mother runs in maxed gear by now. After only a week or two after release. Seems you dont know what is geargrind. Try some mmos

[troops_2015]

If Steam could magically make people honestly rate the game and their issue with it separately (for example: connection problems) then it would IMO not have the poor rating.

I would rate the game 4/5
And networking 0/5

Oh it's troops_2015 again. The man that made it his life goal to bad mouth for honor at every chance he gets. I wish i had your dedication.. I probably would just play something thats fun, but that endurance.. Wow.

Hi Turric, miss me?
You post more than double the amount that I do. As you refuse to comprehend my and some other peoples gripe; it has far more to do with Ubisofts lack of transparency and effort in resolving some quite legitimate complaints that are not so much about the game itself but rather how well it performs, than any perceived slight against you and your beloved game.

If the game works for you then great, but it doesn't work for everyone. Ubisoft would most likely want it to work for as wide a pool of consumers as possible. Hardware limitations of the buying masses does affect design choices in game production, so too does networking. The game itself does have info on min spec and supported hardware at PoS but only asks that you have working internet. Maybe that had something to do with why it has the rating it does.

But your continued defence of this Company, and attempts to diminish peoples concerns, only help promote a 'buyer beware' mentality in the industry. Is that what you really want?

Sorry if I have hijacked this thread, bored at work.

[Entatas]

I've given up with Steam reviews. If I followed the opinions of some of the noisiest people then I wouldn't have played games I actually enjoyed (Hitman, for example). I've noticed quite often that the collective Steam community opinion clashes with mine.