🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #1

    Why Samurai 3rd place with more percentage of territories?

    I have an image! But your image inputting is soo damn stupid!

    Samurai 33.30
    Knights 32.90
    Vikings 33.79

    But how come that Samurai on 3rd place and Knights on the 2nd?
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Vikings had like 24, Knights had 21, and Weebs had like 14.

    Basically, if you want to win don't be a weeb.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #3
    phLOxRSA's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    40
    Originally Posted by DEOVONTAY Go to original post
    Basically, if you want to win don't be a weeb.
    That's really disrespectful. Not all us Samurai are weebs. the samurai culture had more honor than any of those other imaginary factions. I don't see in the history books anything taking about vikings committing seppuku. Checkmate non-samurais! *tips top hat*
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by DEOVONTAY Go to original post
    Vikings had like 24, Knights had 21, and Weebs had like 14.

    Basically, if you want to win don't be a weeb.
    Look at the above numbers idiot! These were the final amount of territories aquired by each faction, and if you can count 33.30 is more than 32.90!!!
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by phLOxRSA Go to original post
    That's really disrespectful. Not all us Samurai are weebs. the samurai culture had more honor than any of those other imaginary factions. I don't see in the history books anything taking about vikings committing seppuku. Checkmate non-samurais! *tips top hat*
    Yeap! You are right!
    Vikings were just stupid barbarians who knew only how to rob others and knights were almost same (know only how to swing weapon right and left) and obey all orders, not having their own mind. Whereas, Samurais were the masters of fight and had deep sense of HONOR and wisdom!
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #6
    p.s. Who started all this ****? Apoleon and the Knights!
    Who fell for such stupid trap of Apoleon'? Vikings
    Who killed Apoleon and restored peace? Samurai
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by KaidzenMonada Go to original post
    I have an image! But your image inputting is soo damn stupid!

    Samurai 33.30
    Knights 32.90
    Vikings 33.79

    But how come that Samurai on 3rd place and Knights on the 2nd?
    Yes, I saw that and didn't understand. I couldn't figure how Samurai were third, not second... not that it matters in term of the crate rewards which were an utter joke
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  8. #8
    Earl_Lemongrab's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    50
    Alone the fact that they are Samurai justifies any punishment against them.



    kappa
    Share this post

  9. #9
    Apparently the only thing that matters is the number of territories the factions have at the moment when the round ends, just as I thought it'd be. I was pretty certain Vikings would win, but I'll gladly concede the 2nd place to the Knights if it's just to show those whiny little Knight girls on forums who complained about getting destroyed all the time that they cried for no reason.

    Anyway, time for a honorable suzuki.
    Share this post

  10. #10
    DrExtrem's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Bremen, Germany
    Posts
    3,488
    Originally Posted by phLOxRSA Go to original post
    That's really disrespectful. Not all us Samurai are weebs. the samurai culture had more honor than any of those other imaginary factions. I don't see in the history books anything taking about vikings committing seppuku. Checkmate non-samurais! *tips top hat*
    The Vikings found no meaning in suicide. Their warriors thrived to fall in battle, with their weapon in hand. To them, suicide was sheer waste and without meaning ... possibly even an act of cowardice.

    On the other hand, did they not hesitate to sacrifice themselves in battle, to save their kin. This IS historically proven.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post