Faction war and RED NAT | Forums

[Thanapetus]

The faction war should be rolled back to where it was before the RED NAT issues developed. Now it will be an issue no matter who wins round 1 because each side will claim they did in fact win.

I doubt UBISOFT will do this but it is only the fair option because I logged on and was only 42k online vs last night when 140k were online.

Thoughts?

[GaiusFreeman]

Yes. Faction war is a joke that wastes players' time by making them watch meaningless updates whenever they log in. Aggregate stats with animations and a token periodical reward. Faction war was an excuse for Ubisoft's Marketing department to use the term "cross-platform" without dealing with "class-action."

My point is that the faction war would need a massive overhaul before I could give a fart about anything altering its results.

[Nicademusx]

The faction war is really just an ubisoft algorithm that works by itself and has nothing to do with how many people play or how many assets are deployed.

Find some actual proof that this is not true.

[Ausweisen]

The burden of proof lies with the one who makes the claim, not with the community.

[Nicademusx]

The burden of proof lies with the one who makes the claim, not with the community.

If this were a court of law sure but its just a thread for a game.

[ThePollie]

The faction war is really just an ubisoft algorithm that works by itself and has nothing to do with how many people play or how many assets are deployed.

Find some actual proof that this is not true.

I had a grand laugh at this, I'll admit. Funniest thing said all year. Well, that and "Wildlands is a realistic, tactical shooter."

[Nicademusx]

I had a grand laugh at this, I'll admit. Funniest thing said all year. Well, that and "Wildlands is a realistic, tactical shooter."

I laugh every time i read it. thanx bro