Depends on where you live.Originally Posted by Turric4n666 Go to original post
In Germany, the Law says, you always have the right to step back from a purchase 14 days after you got the product even if it works properly(this is only untrue for Product wich would become unsellable after such time, like food or underwear, or has been damaged by the customer), wich is certainly not true for video Games.
Furthermore, if a Product doesnt have a feature it should have (was officially announced) or this feature is broken for you, you can get a refund even 6 month after purchase (but you have to ask for the refund as fast as you discover the issue)
So if Ubi says, u cant refund the Game, that doesnt affect the german law, as this stand above ubis policies, wich makes their policy invalid at this point.
So if Ubi would deny refunds for german customers, theyre violating german warranty law and can be sued for that.
German Courts already ruled, that digital products follow the same rules real products do, so there is no excuse for not refunding the Game for German or even European users.
So German users are totally right when they ignore the policy of "no refund whatsoever", because it doesnt take affect in germany. Its like they would have written "with that prchase you also owe us your house, car and you childrens souls". Its just invalid.
So I strongly recommend all german players wanting a refund to go for a lawyer.
I normally don't feed trolls, but trying to explain and get attention for players having the same issued, its how the society works.Originally Posted by Derity Go to original post
shame on you trolling this.
And in UK law, they're going to point to other FUNCTIONING games and say "It's his end, not ours." and poof, there goes your "law"Originally Posted by troops_2015 Go to original post
Don't be foolish.
R$200,00 BR Royals Hard earned man.Originally Posted by King_Mandu Go to original post
I'm not so sure. Neither you nor I can say conclusively what the outcome would be. County court judges/sheriffs do have some discretion for one thing and by the exact same principle one could point to everything that does work on ones internet and hardware and its back to the ubi software not working. Something being faulty isn't decided by majority. Judges, etc will tend to go on principle within the law.Originally Posted by Skvillritz Go to original post
Also,
In the UK this would be a civil case where the burden of proof is different. It is 'balance of probability' not 'beyond reasonable doubt'
These questions would be asked and the presiding judge or sheriff would decide on balance what is more probable.
"Was it reasonable to assume that the game would work on my setup?"
"Is it reasonable to say that every time I try to do something I am met with an error would constitute being defined as 'broken'?"
"Did I take evey reasonable step (opening ports, etc) to make it work?"
The test for these questions would assume the answer of an average and reasonable person. Not the answer of an internet troll, For Honor fanboy, IT professional or CEO of a games company.
But if you couldn't get legal aid or support from CAB, Trading Standards, etc then it could be a very long and potentially expensive exercise.