Lets talk (civilized) about "honor". | Forums

[Brave_Thunder]

Wait wait wait. If someone will kill me then i will learn from him(as i said he would be better) but scrubs that are killing each other for so long should teach me? Hell no. Maybe if he will prevail 1v2 as I would he will be able to teach me something. Where is contradiction in that?

In the fact that you're assuming that he's a scrub till he prevails in a 1v2.But only a fool would negate that gear makes an essential component in 4v4 modes.If he prevails because your gank helped him to reach revenge faster,what do you learn?And if his gear was instead prepared for a 1v1 rather than a gank?Doesn't matter anyway?He could always beat you in a 1v1 and lose the 1v2.

[SiewcaRaka]

In the fact that you're assuming that he's a scrub till he prevails in a 1v2.But only a fool would negate that gear makes an essential component in 4v4 modes.If he prevails because your gank helped him to reach revenge faster,what do you learn?And if his gear was instead prepared for a 1v1 rather than a gank?Doesn't matter anyway?He could always beat you in a 1v1 and lose the 1v2.

If he dies, he doesn't deserve anything and is not able to teach me anything. And if he wins(IF, cause revenge is not insta-win as some small minded people like to think) then i will learn from my mistakes and if he plays hero that i play I will try to incorporate his moves.

[Brave_Thunder]

If he dies, he doesn't deserve anything and is not able to teach me anything. And if he wins(IF, cause revenge is not insta-win as some small minded people like to think) then i will learn from my mistakes and if he plays hero that i play I will try to incorporate his moves.

And what happens if he dies,then beats you on the next round,being the opponent that you face at the start?In this case you have effectively wasted a fight with him,assuming he would've been able to defeat your teammate without your help.In a ranked setting,I would act exactly like you,I learned to never trust my teammates and I know the frustration that comes from winning on your own,but still falling on the ladder for scrubs teammates.But now,we should be more insterested in mastering combat skills,rather than using all that we have to gain a victory.

[gloktoten2]

You got the "non honor" section completely wrong.

Hard facts

The 2v2 mode doesn't make 1 player invincible until the others have finished duels.

It COULD be structurable how you think it SHOULD be played very easily. IT ISN'T.

This hard fact means the game CAN be played however the person wants. You're free to run around the map doing whatever you want. I'm free to interupt your duel and backstab you.

Telling other people how you THINK they should play their game, is nothing more than a childish attitude. You don't get to control how people live their lives, you don't get to control how people play their games.

Sorry kiddos. Don't like it, play 1v1. That mode exists for a reason.

[GewaltSam]

One of the greatest matchmaking features in For Honor, if you ask me, is the option to play against the same opponent(s) over and over again, if you wish to do so. It's possible to look after each round for new opponents, but you can also stay with somebody, have a nice chat about the game, and try different things on each other for hours if you wish.

Now, if you're one of the peeps that really hate dishonorable plays, you can at least do matchmaking until you find somebody with the same mindset like you. This is not that hard especially in 2on2. I had a lot of people against me that even consisted on playing out their version of honorable play. If you find that special somebody, play them for a while and enjoy an experience like you wished for. But, I have to say, if people play the game in a way you don't like, and the mechanics allow it (to go further, even cater to it; spike walls are not there by mistake), you have no right to be offended about it, to be honest. You are free to look for other opponents of course, but let me tell you that you're missing out on a part of the game that is there for a reason! The battles near environmental dangers between two (or more) people that know their stuff is soo intense, and without it, this game would be less than it is. I know for some this sounds impossible, even idiotic, but that's probably because you haven't figured out how to parry and counter guard breaks right. It is NOT - THAT - HARD, it depends on timing and can be learned, even by casual gamers and people with average reflexes. If you don't believe me, you haven't really tried so far. I taught the basics to a LOT of people since release, and I saw how all of them got a lot better at technical fighting in FH. There are rules behind those mechanics, they are not very difficult, but there's a lot of them, and if you learn them, you learn how to play the ledge game. I guarantee this.

[JRAD541]

Why is this even a thing? Why are there even discussions about it? Just because the title is called 'For Honor'... it's just the same as a player using a pistol in Call of Duty, or only gunning down a player when there are no other players in the vicinity. It's just plain stupid.

I will do whatever the game allows me to do in all modes. Like many people have said before, if you want honour, then go play 1v1.

^^^^ yup