Please stop with this Social Justice Warrior crap. I myself I understand what he's referring too, no character should be gender locked if their going to have female knights, samurai and etc.Originally Posted by Jaessica7 Go to original post
Im a Peace Keeper user myself, and I would prefer to play as a male version, I myself don't like the whole gender locked Idea myself, specially if the game has customization. This has nothing to do with Misogyny, or hating females not everyone girl want's to play as a guy and not every guy want's to play as a girl.
Would love to try playing as a male PK myself. I don't get why they have this gender lock bs if the games has a customization feature and most characters can go male or female.Originally Posted by ghostirq Go to original post
It's just a class name at the end of the day. Pretty sure no one was a Valkyrie until they died and were then chosen.Originally Posted by Valfrekr Go to original post
Originally Posted by Sallandair Go to original postI didn't articulate what I wrote because I was triggered when I wrote it. There got to be a reason for their design otherwise it will be stupid. I don't understand the reason of making this gender locked. Why not have the option for both gender? If you know why they did it that way or have a theory, than by all mean I'm all ears.Originally Posted by Starcanum Go to original post
Originally Posted by Sallandair Go to original postI never said that there wasn't any female Knights, Viking or Samurai. Have you heard of any? For most people the answer is no, and there is a reason for that.Originally Posted by Valfrekr Go to original post
Female SamuraiOriginally Posted by ghostirq Go to original post
Female Knight ( Or there's always Joan
Female Viking
The history books of old are filled with tales of knights, lords, kings & queens, but often there is little to nothing written about common idiots. That doesn't mean they didn't exist. (edit: let alone in a varying quantity.)Originally Posted by ghostirq Go to original post
Originally Posted by DannusGreattus Go to original post
Uhhh, Valk's folklore reads they (valks) would be the ones to choose who died in battle. They held the title of being a Valkyrie long before their own deaths.
I too am for gender locks being removed. It's generally arbitrary and only serves to limit what the player can and can't play.
In some cases it makes sense - Nobushi and Valkyrie were traditionally females. A woman probably couldn't get big enough to be a Sugoki. Alright, fine. But it makes absolutely no sense that you can't have a male peacekeeper, or a female warlord. So what, guys are wiry enough to be an Orochi/Beserker but Christian men are too big and beefy to be a quick, rogue type? Women can wield a shield and flail if they fight for the Knights, but a shield and sword for the viking? OH NO WAY IMPOSSIBLE.
It's dumb, and the gender lock restrictions must be reduced or removed.
Originally Posted by Sallandair Go to original postCommon idiots are still common. Female warriors are not common. My problem with the campaign is that they make female warriors pretty common. My problem with multiplayer is the gender lock.Originally Posted by FramboisMan Go to original post
Your right, Everyone except Men should be allowed to align with their gender identity, We should celebrate others and deride men for it. We should also label and insult them for it. (just Men).Originally Posted by Jaessica7 Go to original post