hey this one is goodOriginally Posted by default91 Go to original post
Based on one or a few day one tournaments ? The game is still new, call me noob if you want but i don't believe your "understanding" of the game is that great until we see how it evolves during the next few months.Originally Posted by G0BackT0G0 Go to original post
There is a misconception about tier lists : these are primarly based on matchups.Originally Posted by nf_Straydog Go to original post
Let's say, for example :
Character A has 8 favorable matchups, 1 mostly even ones and 2 unfavorable ones.
Character B has 3 favorable matchups, 4 moslty even ones and 4 unfavorable ones.
The tier list would say that character A is ranked higher than character B. However, it turns out that character B is, for some reason, one of the unfavorable matchups of character A. Which means that when players are equally skilled, character B is more likely to win the duel against character A.
This is why you see counterpicks in fighting games, in order to cover as many matchups as possible.
Yeah what the **** would I know, I only finished 1st and 2nd in the last 2 tournaments and won $700 worth of **** by playing conqueror. Please, enlighten me.Originally Posted by G0BackT0G0 Go to original post
lol i was hoping you would come back here and tell him that....i was laughing so hard when he told you that you had no idea what top players thought when you are the top player righ tnow (at least one of). You should have won that last tournament btw...you completely outplayed animegirl. he got lucky on those 3 environmental kills...plus i think you had a round that you could have thrown him off but didnt.Originally Posted by Aarpian Go to original post
Unfortunately, the validity of an opinion isn't based on authority on a subject (that's the appeal to authority fallacy). The fact is that people can say whatever they want to benefit their position, for example since you play Conqueror, you might say Conqueror is **** simply to hope for a buff. Fact remains that you did well with a Conqueror, thus it cannot possibly be low tier (unless you fancy yourself a God can capable of reaching 2nd place with a **** class).Originally Posted by Aarpian Go to original post
We don't deal with opinions, we deal with facts and logic. Which part of the tier list do you disagree with and what logical reason do you have and HOW do you verbalize it? Try that.
It's way too early to finalize a tier list. I'd say it's way too early for 'high level' play.
A fighting game meta takes time, tournaments, and loads of data to figure out. Sm4sh didn't get its first tier list until maybe a year plus some into the game. I remember when people thought Duck Hunt was a good character, and Mario was mid tier. Just watch a video of how 'high level' Mario mains played in the early game, then watch Ally in his newer tournaments (the one where he beat Zero is a good one).
I'd say at least way for all the characters to come out, then wait for a couple of tournaments, then we can determine a tier list.
Entirely untrue. I main Warden now. I DID main Orochi before which is why I know he's weaknesses so intimately.Originally Posted by darksavior1977 Go to original post
Dodge, really? Dodge? First of all, who complains about dodge? WHO STILL DODGES? No good Orochi dodges over parry. Parry give you a stronger punish and it's safer (you can feint the parry if it fails). Dodge is for noob stomping only.