Play to win and that's all that matters. If people want to hinder themselves by only using what they consider honorable play styles feel free. However, players who want to win as much as possible will use whatever tactics lead to the victory the most often. I'm sure there will be a community of players who setup set rules just like in Dark Souls and then everyone should be happy.
Obviously this only includes intentional game play not cheating.
Samoas obviouslyOriginally Posted by tweak1668 Go to original post![]()
Well there are many types of people.
Some really enjoy winning, to them, fight with every advantage, fight dirty, backstab, cliff throwing, gang up and flee are all "smart" instead of cowardness. It's also true, because in real war, if you fight clean and do those honor thing, you probably won't live long enough to tell those stories.
Some enjoy honor itself, win or lose this is just a game, it is the spirit you carry with you after the match is finished, you know you fight clean, follows the warrior code and get a result, win or lose because of it. They gives their enemy a fair fight and also for themself, some of them are very skilled, as a result of that.
And some are hybrid, like me. I don't follow any rules, but if my opponent wait for me, then I wait for them, honor goes both ways. However if the enemy fight dirty, like use the environment A LOT, or BM after cheap kills or what so ever, I will throw them off cliff, use my bow, or just do unblockable back stab. Dishonor also goes both ways.
So yeah, the real honorable warriors are honorable because they walk their way, no matter what others do. If you are truly that honorable, you will wait for your enemy even if they gang you over and over, and win both honor and the match.
Your autism is showing by not staying relevant to the topic. Next.Originally Posted by Dylan_47 Go to original post
Shhhhh. Too much logic. The people here will have aneurysm. In all seriousness though. Perfectly said. I can't even add to this.Originally Posted by winterf0xes Go to original post
Aren't you a little jolly fun fella.Originally Posted by BlackbirdMPK Go to original post
You are not realy expecting an assassin to play by some rule books of high knight templar, aren't you?
Honor for one person is not the same like honor for someone else. There was that Star Trek episode (can't remember if Next Generation or DS9), but Worf (Klingon and everyone knows how "honorable" they are) explains some dirty tactics the Klingons use... he is asked "Well that is not very honorable." To which Worf replies "In war there is only one thing honorable: victory." Sure this is not RL war, but a game based on war and everything goes. Basicaly what you say, what I mentioned in another thread already: imagine you are the quarterback of a football team, you get the ball... now, what you want is: only the quarterback of the opposing team is allowed to go after you to stop you, everyone else have just to watch. Ehhhh... hehehe, serious? They are all going after you, no matter if you like it or not, that are the rules. And in an 4on4 match of For Honor, you can pretty much expect 4on1 at some point (I can not remember EVER anyone in DOTA or LoL complaining about the lack of honor.... hmmmmm).
Then... with what I have seen sofar in this game... can we realy talk about cowards? I have seen wardens onehit kill a raider at 100% life, I have seen lawbringers charge and push someone else half across the map towards the next ledge/pit... I have seen heavies run and swing faster then peacekeepers. And then this lag... for a reaction based game peer-to-peer is the most stupid thing Ubisoft could actualy do. I have games, actualy most of them, even vs ai, I have lag of 500+ ms... quite funny when you press a button (dodge) and nothing happens for the next half second... or move the mouse to change guard stance and nothing happens again. Nah, I am not up for duels... I play an assassin and if I can sneak behind you and stab you in your back, I will do it, thats why the class is called "assassin"... if I would like to play by your high morale rules, I would play a knight templar.
Live with it, play only duels... but the second you go into an 2on2 or 4on4 you are doomed.
People crying about "no honor" in For Honor are more annoying then someome who tells me "f*** noob". And if you think I am a coward, go ahead, be my guest, your honorable knightly opinion is just that, your opinion.
The issue I have is that revives force you to either guard corpses or risk enemies coming back to mob you. It's not fun to stand over a body "just in case" while your allies are actually fighting, but with all the players *cough*peacekeepers*cough* dashing around playing the revival game you're stuck with that crappy choice if you want to secure winning. Winning should not be unfun, yet there it is
I have a couple of times. It's odd; people just line up and wait for their turn to fight the victor, like a tournament or something. Now if only there actually was a tournament mode...Originally Posted by Kharneth88 Go to original post
AI does exactly that though. They'll immediately run off to gank another guy at the start of a match if you don't stop them. Sometimes they'll do that or run off to get a powerup if they're losing a fight. Whatever the "intent" is, the machines only care about victoryOriginally Posted by BlackbirdMPK Go to original post
That's a complete and utter lie. The AI I have fought have 100% of the time squared up and fought until death.Originally Posted by MisterCynic18 Go to original post