What I mean by this is who here actually lets other players 1v1 an opponent, rather than rushing in to 'help' them.
I always let my partner/s fight their own battles even if they are gonna lose because of it. Cause how are they supposed to improve if I keep lending them a hand.
I will be honorable in 2v2s, unless the enemy isn't then I won't be. However in 4v4, it is kill or be killed!Originally Posted by zeratul__12 Go to original post
Ok you clearly missed what I was saying.Originally Posted by Munktor Go to original post
Regardless of the mode I let my partner face an opponent alone so that they can improve and be more honorable.
The only time I get involved is when someone else tries to interfere
No, I completely understood what you were saying. In essence, you'd rather hurt your team in a team-mode instead of just playing 1v1. I got that loud and clear. If they wanted to 1v1, they'd be in a 1v1 mode, not a 2v2 or 4v4. They're probably wondering, "why is my teammate just standing there, what an idiot!"Originally Posted by zeratul__12 Go to original post
Why? Because they didn't select 1v1, they selected 2v2 or 4v4.
I'm guessing you missed my point, so I went overboard explaining it.
Originally Posted by Munktor Go to original post
Ok then I can see it from that perspective.
So you dont find it annoying when someone else finishes off your opponent?
1v1 and 2v2 modes are considered honorable fights for most of the people so im gonna be honorable in those if my enemy is as well. Mostly they are. In 4v4 is completely different and i havent seen anyone do it and i dont have a problem with it and im gonna gank because i know they would too. In 2v2 i havent experienced unhonorable opponents yet but i dont play that much 2v2s. In 1v1 duels i wont even use the environment if my opponent doesnt. But i dont have a problem with it. If you gank me or push me off map, fine. Its there for you to use it so go ahead. Only thing that annoys me are pussies who run away at the start just to gank others or at the end in 1v4 situations...just wasting everyones time..
This is a post I left on a forum titles "The Honor Police"
http://forums.ubi.com/showthread.php...ce-1vs1/page13
I encourage the read, it's a little scrolling, but the simple fact of the matter is that this is a video game where-in all game modes outside of 1v1 duels don't have this convoluted ideal of honor a lot of people seem to have. Look at the definition of honor that's in that post, it's not at all what most people seem to idealize. There is a difference between honor and chivalry. A lot of people, alone with the title of this post, have the ideal of chivalry. Chivalry is giving your opponent even odds with a 1v1 fight. You see an act of chivalry delivered in the story campaign in a fight between the warder and a viking. At the end of the fight, the loser is conveyed that they "fought with honor." It only means that they fought with esteem and are praised for the challenge the put up. That it! In battles, or war, there is a fine line between chivalry and stupidity. If you outnumber the opponent, the nicest thing that can be done is to offer them surrender and take them as prisoners of war. Nobody would ever rely on the last enemy being finished off by their best warrior. Kill them until they submit or kill them all. So in 1v1, preformulated for skill against skill alone. "So you'll put down your rock, i'll put down my sword, and we'll settle this like civilized people?" - The Dread Pirate Roberts (The Princess Bride). Everything else is about team winning and that means a gang of places may beat you into submission. Welcome to the rules of war.