Originally Posted by
ReyusD
Go to original post
1.
so someone offers you to test a product for 3 days for free.
then you go and buy the product.
3 days later you cry about how bad it is
so who is bad and should feel stupid? you or the product?
2.
so we have 2 attack buttons and 3 directions - thats 6 different attacks
sfv has 6 attack buttons
and if we compare the special moves list of the 2 games then i would call it pretty even
also this is a melee weapon fighting game - throwing fireballs around or do 3 foot high uppercuts wouldnt fit.
1. Demo, not full product. This small sentace completely disproves your first point. And not "MGS V: Ground Zeroes" type of demo, but just simplified and cutted early build.
2. SFV: Acuma, 21 moves, 6 buttons. For Honor: Lawbringer, (most comlicated character) 13 moves, 6 buttons. Not even close. Also: Soul Calibur, (fighting game with melee weapons) Ezio Auditore, ~81 moves, 6 buttons; Tekken, ~100 moves, 6 buttons; etc. And dont even try to tell me that "most of those moves generally not used". Even Chivalry with its broken and glitchy mechanics had at least 20 (known to me) fighting techniques, which ranged from a character to the character, due to their personal specifications...
"also this is a melee weapon fighting game - throwing fireballs around or do 3 foot high uppercuts wouldnt fit." Well, some characters can throw friebombs, axes and stuff, heal themselves\allies and activate press X to win Revenge thingy... Have ever played For Honor?
Originally Posted by
ZuivrZilvr
Go to original post
No one cares to see a whiner leave. Why are you even posting here?
As for me, this game won't be dead for years to come.
I do, for example, because his post (even if you take into account his "resounding statement", probably based on personal indignation) looks like a feedback, not "whining".
1 people found this helpful