Oleg, is the data in the Objects vewer correct? | Forums

[Maple_Tiger]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JG26Red:
I Just wish the FW series, especially the As where more correct, thats all i fly

BUT no reason to kill the american planes either... i know somebody will egg me with this comment, but this game is made by russians? no wonder the russian planes are so good..

heres a beer for hoping the TA152, Spit and p38 are properly moddeled and not deballed...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Actualy my favorit plane to fly when im on the Blue side is the FWA9 or A4. The later A9 or D9 kind of feel like what the P-47 was in 1.0. You pull on the stick even just a little bit and the plane would shake. Is that realistic, even if your at like 500kmh TAS?

[faustnik]

RAF testing found little difference in turn ability between the P-51B and the Fw190A. The RAF found the Anton to be a very maneuverable a/c.

American pilots considered the Fw190s to be superior in maneuverability to the Bf109s that they encountered.


www.7Jg77.com

[JG26Red]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by faustnik:
RAF testing found little difference in turn ability between the P-51B and the Fw190A. The RAF found the Anton to be a very maneuverable a/c.

American pilots considered the Fw190s to be superior in maneuverability to the Bf109s that they encountered.

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/mdegnan/_images/FaustSig
http://www.7jg77.com

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


high speed manev? low speed? the russians didnt think much of the 190... is that why it is somewhat porked in FB?

[WUAF_Badsight]

when historical accounts mention "maneuervability" they are not meaning tight turning

thats why the FW-190 "out maneuervers" the spitfire even tho the spitfire would slaughter the FWs in a turn fight

the KI-84 does do insane loops at high speed showing unbelieveable elevator authority

but try showing me even ONE reference about the Hayate was a poor handeler ?

it was a Awesome design just as Many other japanese designs were

their historical manufacturing problems that led to poor RL performance IS NOT moddeled

we get perfectly constructed A/C in FB , all models

the fact that japanese designs were such good performers might be a shock but too bad

even their "interceptors" had turn fighting ability

be thankfull that the "SHINDEN" isnt coming to FB

we are getting the "RAIDEN" tho hopefully , it had even better performance than the Hayate

[JG26Red]

I can never fathom why somebody would want to fly a japanese plane, especially if your from USA... uggghh...

Shinden is pretty interesting, would give the D0335 a good fight, but i think the Doriner would still come out on top...

[faustnik]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WUAF_Badsight:
when historical accounts mention "maneuervability" they are not meaning tight turning
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

The RAF report I mention had a specific reference to "turning circle". It stated there was "not much to choose" between the P-51B and 190A turning circle.


www.7Jg77.com

[WUAF_Badsight]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JG26Red:
I can never fathom why somebody would want to fly a japanese plane, especially if your from USA... uggghh...

Shinden is pretty interesting, would give the D0335 a good fight, but i think the Doriner would still come out on top...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Simply put .... the JAF were best prepared for turning fights when WW2 started

flying the best turn fighters of the day

& at the end of WW2 appeared the D0335 & Shinden prototype

seeing as the Shinden would have been just about as fast the the Dornier but with way superior maneuervability i think the Do335 would have been the Shindens play toy

[BerkshireHunt]

"Oleg, is the data in the Objects viewer correct?"

Taken from the object viewer:

Bf109F4 (1941)
Engine: Daimler Benz DB601E
Power:
Indicated 2390HP
Take off 3120HP

So I'd say it's about as reliable as The Hitler Diaries.

[Maple_Tiger]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BerkshireHunt:
"Oleg, is the data in the Objects viewer correct?"

Taken from the object viewer:

Bf109F4 (1941)
Engine: Daimler Benz DB601E
Power:
Indicated 2390HP
Take off 3120HP

So I'd say it's about as reliable as The Hitler Diaries.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Lmao, lol.

I was board today and wanted to see if there was actualy a russion plane that could not reach its top speed. Well i found one. But if i say what it is then it might be corrected

Ill give you a hint. Its Max speed at 5km altitude is 672-700kmh TAS. I managed 667kmh TAS. Nice to know there is one russion plane that cant reach its max speed at altitude.

[Gunner_361st]

Comrades! We all know Forgotten Battles is not perfect! But it is very very good! and it is very fun! and...

I exclusively fly all FB aircraft.