A single player campaign, a multiplayer, AAA graphics, 12 unique heroes, 12 maps with 4 to 6 variations each, 5 game modes, deep and rich balanced gameplay, deep and rich customisation and levelling sytem, faction war meta game, at least 6 other heroes coming for free, at least 6 other maps coming for free, a ranked mode coming for free.
30 bucks ? Yeah right. And what about stop saying ******** ? How much should cost a game doesn't depend on whether you like it or not but how much content it has to offer. Here : that's plenty enough.
As matter of example : for 60 bucks at release, battlefield 1 offered 9 maps without variations and 5 classes to choose between....
didnt think battl;efield was worth that kind of cash eitherOriginally Posted by Trenk2009 Go to original post
What people? Not the people I surround myself with. Just because you're easily influenced by peer pressure doesn't mean others are. None of my friends would ever consider dropping that kind of money for the most overrated thing known to man. The best part is you're paying double to triple of the actual value of the product, that's not very intelligent. I feel this game is worth 60 dollars, but I won't be buying it. Games in general just become more and more disappointing as companies focus more and more on milking the clueless consumer like yourself. Anyone trying to justify pricing based on a night out on the town is not one suited for making wise financial decisions. Your kind is easily taken advantage of and all relevant gaming companies are looking to exploit your pockets.Originally Posted by Muppetlords Go to original post