If the game is released with out PvP | Forums

[PAUL-AWOL-]

I'm not going to buy it and UBI will lose a long time fan of the game.

If it's implemented at a later date that is wrong in my opinion and it sounds like to me a light bulb went off too little too late. So now UBI is scrambling because they realised it was a bad idea and saw all the die hards jumping ship,, so now they are trying to implement it which I feel was never part of the original plan.

We will see if PvP makes it to launch, I don't think it will be there.

[bent_toe]

I will buy it...down the road, when it's on sale.

[oVoPicasso]

I'm not going to buy it and UBI will lose a long time fan of the game.

If it's implemented at a later date that is wrong in my opinion and it sounds like to me a light bulb went off too little too late. So now UBI is scrambling because they realised it was a bad idea and saw all the die hards jumping ship,, so now they are trying to implement it which I feel was never part of the original plan.

We will see if PvP makes it to launch, I don't think it will be there.

I think the Co-Op Campaign will be fun enough for me to buy at launch... However, without PVP being integrated at some point, this game will have a very short shelf life after I beat up all the NPC.

Coming from a die-hard GR fan and PVP player.

[Darksx]

Why do you need PVP in a game like this? It is not needed. There is no place in Wildlands for PVP. I personally despise pvp, it usually ends up breaking the SP game in some way because of some crappy balance need. 40K Deathwing anyone? The Heavy Flamer was removed from the game, an Icon weapon because the devs could not find a balance to make this weapon work in PVP. its this kind of rubbish that just peeves me off to no end when PVP breaks the regular game.

[PAUL-AWOL-]

Why do you need PVP in a game like this? It is not needed. There is no place in Wildlands for PVP. I personally despise pvp, it usually ends up breaking the SP game in some way because of some crappy balance need. 40K Deathwing anyone? The Heavy Flamer was removed from the game, an Icon weapon because the devs could not find a balance to make this weapon work in PVP. its this kind of rubbish that just peeves me off to no end when PVP breaks the regular game.

Because if the game is sold with the Ghost Recon name on it, then it should have PvP. This is a Ghost Recon core value of the game that is missing and I feel they just used the name to make a quick dollar.

To each his own I guess but you don't sound like a fan of Ghost Recon, just a fan of open world games.

[Assassino37]

I'm not going to buy it and UBI will lose a long time fan of the game.

If it's implemented at a later date that is wrong in my opinion and it sounds like to me a light bulb went off too little too late. So now UBI is scrambling because they realised it was a bad idea and saw all the die hards jumping ship,, so now they are trying to implement it which I feel was never part of the original plan.

We will see if PvP makes it to launch, I don't think it will be there.

Based on this, you are making it sound like a week ago people got their hands on the game for the first time, found out no PvP is currently in the game, complained and that Ubisoft literally just starting working on it. Do you have any idea how long game design takes? To think only because recently people have been demanding PvP and it's only because of that they are implementing it is absurd. They obviously have had to been working on PvP for awhile now but their focus was the main game first. If you can't even enjoy the game before the PvP arrives then perhaps this game is not for you.

No it's not coming at launch which has been said around here. But it's coming, isn't that all that should matter?

[TheSgtOpt]

Why do you need PVP in a game like this? It is not needed. There is no place in Wildlands for PVP. I personally despise pvp, it usually ends up breaking the SP game in some way because of some crappy balance need. 40K Deathwing anyone? The Heavy Flamer was removed from the game, an Icon weapon because the devs could not find a balance to make this weapon work in PVP. its this kind of rubbish that just peeves me off to no end when PVP breaks the regular game.

If there is no PVP the game dies quick. PVP gives a game longevity. PVE is boring and predictable. Even on the hardest of difficulties AI will never be as hard as battling real people. Also GR always has had PVP and should always have it.

[PAUL-AWOL-]

Based on this, you are making it sound like a week ago people got their hands on the game for the first time, found out no PvP is currently in the game, complained and that Ubisoft literally just starting working on it. Do you have any idea how long game design takes? To think only because recently people have been demanding PvP and it's only because of that they are implementing it is absurd. They obviously have had to been working on PvP for awhile now but their focus was the main game first. If you can't even enjoy the game before the PvP arrives then perhaps this game is not for you.

No it's not coming at launch which has been said around here. But it's coming, isn't that all that should matter?

It seems I will saving 60 dollars and Ubi will be losing another fan of GR then.

And yes due to the Beta release that was when it was made crystal clear in my eyes that PvP was never part of the game.. So after the Beta the fans went off in regards to this and now it seems they are announcing PvP. Kind of odd how this happened after the Beta, you think.

And honestly I don't think you know how long it takes to implement PvP, so stop voicing facts with out back up, and stick to the guessing game just like everyone else.

I have been watching this game day 1 announcement and there was never mention of PvP and many have been asking since the first video put out by Ubi, so this isn't new to them.

[BR4VO.]

They will have pvp. Maybe not at launch. What kind of pvp they will have worries me.

[Holotip6]

Because if the game is sold with the Ghost Recon name on it, then it should have PvP. This is a Ghost Recon core value of the game that is missing and I feel they just used the name to make a quick dollar.

To each his own I guess but you don't sound like a fan of Ghost Recon, just a fan of open world games.

exactly! i read people comments saying GRW doesn't need PVP. GR has always been PVP.....starting to think they never played a GR title game...and trying to compare this to Division.