Ganking in 2v2 | Forums

[JonYurBz]

There has been plenty of matches, 2v2, where both sides split off to 1v1 each other. Who after wins one, goes to where the other 2 are 1v1'ing and wait till its over. If the enemy is not killed, they engage. Its essentially having 2 1v1's in a round if one of each side falls. The next round, they switch opponents.

I find this far more enjoyable then any of the other game modes. You get to test skill 1v1, but against more then one person in a single round. Instead of having to 1v1, guy leaves, search for a new match every time. Of course some 1v1' lobbies last longer, but not quiet as fun fighting the same person over and over again, the 2v2 is a nice mix-up. Even if you have to search for a new lobby, that's 2 new players to 1v1.



Because there is obviously something there for 1v1's in 2v2 mode. As said, Its not a gank-fest like the other modes. There is a good portion of the community that likes it this way and want to see it expanded on. We're here for constructive feedback, not telling ppl to go somewhere else. Its not the help section.



Fighting for a faction isn't all the honor. Testing your skill and fighting someone of equal or greater is more honorable to me. There's no real reward to fight for your faction, do it doesn't feel like an honor to.

I agree. I play 2v2 with buddy and like it much more than the 4v4 dominion. It lets the combat system shine in our opinion. When we play 2v2 we waited 9 out of 10 times for fight to end. Only when enemy refused honor we returned the favor. Just find it more fun that way to wait. Really, do we need to play 2v2 like 4v4 dominion?

I'd love to play duel but my Warden didn't do well against all orchi and nobushi last night in that mode. That bleed is a bit too much. With mm finding me players with rep over one and the char lvl thing well above mine! Mostly dudes in the 30-50s. It was alot of defeats in a row. Basically lots of matches against dudes that played nothing but this all weekend! It hurt. But can't wait until the 14th cause I will dive deeeeep into this game with my friends.

[kaveman528]

when i win and the other person is still fighting then i just emote off to the side and cheer on my teammate (unless they gank me, then i unleash the power of the burning 6th circle of hell on them)

[ReggiR]

If that's the case why do they separate the players into a duel-like scenario?If it's just an average team mode then wouldn't they just put your team & the other team in front of each other & let you have at it,then?It separated us into duels because it's honorable to fight fairly.Hell,people in real life fought/fight & died/die for it.Duels & Brawls are like they are because the game is literally called "For Honor".Also,if it's just a 2v2 battle:where is the soldiers?I don't see any like in Dominion.You are dishonorable fighter if you gang up & by the way you typed "gentlemen's rules" your not really an honorable person anyway.So If you don't like being called dishonorable either change your ways or get over it.It's just a word.It only has meaning if you let it.

Ekhm, there is one map where both players from team starts next to each other. And second, if this should be 2x 1vs1, why there is no wall between that 1vs1 duels? It could have gate that will open, when both duels are finished for another duel, if ppl from diffirent teams survived. This mode allows to do 2x 1vs1 or 2vs2. Its up to you how you and your friend choose a tactic, but dont be offended when opponents will take diffirent one.

[Mathonn]

Ekhm, there is one map where both players from team starts next to each other. And second, if this should be 2x 1vs1, why there is no wall between that 1vs1 duels? It could have gate that will open, when both duels are finished for another duel, if ppl from diffirent teams survived. This mode allows to do 2x 1vs1 or 2vs2. Its up to you how you and your friend choose a tactic, but dont be offended when opponents will take diffirent one.

This.

There was a very narrow map where we started as a partnership facing the other. The ensuing fights were quite entertaining as we approached each other crossing back and forth to draw one opponent to the better matchup or separate them in a strategic way. The game mode is open ended to allow you to set the verbal agreement if you choose, but the rules are not inherent ad players should not be criticized for playing in a team manner.

[VillNess]

I personally always let my partner finish their fight if I kill my opponent first. That's if the enemies do the same but if not I return the favor. I know ganking is part of 2v2 but I don't like it.

I wish there was more game modes, I'd like to play with my friend in a team but not in ganking game...

I'd love to see the game implement a 1v1 Endurance Tournament mode, where you and up to 3 buddies can pair up against another 4 and see which team is overall better

something like this!

[Gen.Wolf]

Yep, I'm not playing 2v2 to be ganked. Beside that point, So far I just see ppl telling me to go somewhere else instead of being constructive on the topic. I get there are ppl that don't want to understand the concept I'm talking about, or just be trolls and tell myself and others to go to 1v1, but the purpose of this forum and section is to be constructive on the "thought" of. Not just reply with a short or long message stating "go play 1v1/deal with it". Either contribute or post else where.

[Mathonn]

Except the "go play 1v1" is intended as constructive, because you are looking for a rule set that is in play in the Duel and not in the Brawl, and insulting those that are playing the Brawl as a 2v2 matchup.

I'll restate it as simply as I can.,, if you enter a 2v2 and lose your partner first, you are not being "ganked", you are suffering the unfortunate drawbacks of having lost your partner. You are basically calling people cheap for playing the team game they entered into and then bailing because you want them to play by other rules.

If you communicate a "gentlemen's" agreement before the match that you will all wait for each individual contest to finish before continuing the engagement and somebody breaks the agreement, then by all means be mad at the guy who dishonors the agreement.

The overall solution is a Round Robin mode that sets those rules, but without a "karma" system applied to honor the only way to make sure one adheres to that would be to separate the individual duels via gates.

[Avirex_Idyll]

Except the "go play 1v1" is intended as constructive, because you are looking for a rule set that is in play in the Duel and not in the Brawl, and insulting those that are playing the Brawl as a 2v2 matchup.

I'll restate it as simply as I can.,, if you enter a 2v2 and lose your partner first, you are not being "ganked", you are suffering the unfortunate drawbacks of having lost your partner. You are basically calling people cheap for playing the team game they entered into and then bailing because you want them to play by other rules.

If you communicate a "gentlemen's" agreement before the match that you will all wait for each individual contest to finish before continuing the engagement and somebody breaks the agreement, then by all means be mad at the guy who dishonors the agreement.

The overall solution is a Round Robin mode that sets those rules, but without a "karma" system applied to honor the only way to make sure one adheres to that would be to separate the individual duels via gates.

^ THIS

The OP is complaining because everyone is not adhering to their idea of what 2v2 brawl means. it is a brawl, not a elimination-style fight. Do not get mad because your ideology is not getting the reinforcement you think it should.

[Feydakin_]

The "ganking" is part of a 2v2.

In my opinion it should however be a bit easier to prevent your opponent from running off into the other fight. It's too easy at the moment.

[Theonlymiles]

Can we have a function where it disables ppl from interfering in a 1v1? There is a big portion of the community that plays 1v1 and 2v2 because the other modes are nothing but a huge ganging-fest.

* Yes that was a bit of a rant, but be constructive on the general idea/concept of what I am saying. If you aren't going to post something constructive on the topic with replies such as "go to 1v1, there's a 1v1 for that,to bad deal with it" ect ect. Then don't post. I just see anything like that as troll posts and ignore it. This is a feedback and general discussion forum/thread for the beta. Not "game play support" for what game mode I should be playing.*

I have to say I think that makes the 2v2 game mode all the more interesting, as others have said it adds more pressure to the 2v2 but it also adds a level of 'honor' and 'respect' to the game. many players will allow you to fight your opponent without interference, if not then its really about staying in the fight until your revenge mode is up