yes 12vs12 3 or 2 faction warfield
no 12vs12 3 or 2 faction warfield
yes 24vs24 3 or 2 faction Warfield
no 24vs24 3 or 2 faction Warfield
yes 32vs32 2 faction Warfield
no 32vs32 2 faction Warfield
Id like to see this. It would make people think twice before just running in there slashing all over the place.Originally Posted by S8Canadian Go to original post
The lack of knowledge from this post annoyed me. You must not know about shooter games.Originally Posted by GodzBlaze-Qc Go to original post
This is literally battlefield...but I also said the same thingOriginally Posted by DBLxxShotz Go to original post
I would prefer an 8v8 then a 12v12. The maps are already at max hold 4v4. Once people stop panicking and realize if their are getting outnumbered, block 3-4 hits and your get free revenge mode, pop it knock someone down and kill them. Keep blocking and get revenge mode again. I've played games where its me vs 3 and throughout the fight I got revenge mode 2 times. But this depends on the players reaction time so you never know if you have the advantage or not when ganking someone.![]()
yes but it could also be a faction based 8vs8vs8(Viking vs samurai vs knight) on bigger maps of course and ganking is part of a multiplayer mode it happens in ALL multiplayer game even shooter ex: 3 tanks against 1 tanks, 4 guy with rpg against 1 tank and so on) so I don't see what the problem is .Originally Posted by Helnekromancer Go to original post
yes 4 vs 4 vs 4 would be nice be faction based ( Viking vs samurai vs knight)Originally Posted by S8Canadian Go to original post
Actually you could still do my rush mode idea pretty easily with 4v4 also. Youd just have to change the rules a bit and simply use minions like in dominion.Originally Posted by droper66 Go to original post