Honor rating | Forums

[shaw7475]

I saw a video by MSNUAngel, it was called Honorcrafting. In it he was talking about the community of games and how sometimes they can be toxic. That got me thinking what if there was an honor rating in the game that people could vote on, like if someones being helpful or nice or whatever you could click an "honorable button" and after a certain amount of time the #1 person could get like a reward or something. It gives people a reason to actively not be jerks. Maybe even adding a "dishonorable option" if wanted. I think this could be a good way to help keep the community going good. What do you guys think?

[xLeapingLizardx]

I mean that's actually a pretty good idea! I'm not sure how many people will take the time to use it though.

I easily voted for "honorable option only" otherwise a "dishonorable" option can easily be abused. People could say someone is dishonorable just because they are salty from losing or, as people have been saying is dishonorable, if a person uses the environment for an instant kill

[lollob93]

i don't like the idea since there will be a lot of salty people voting for ''dishonor'' just because they lost. the honor-only is superfluous

[Dez_troi_aR]

A lot of people might use it to punish victorious opponents.

But on the positive side it could also encourage people to play with some dignity. Like not flaming your opponent, or letting your teammate finish his 1v1 before you interfere in brawls.
I am in favour of it.

[lollob93]

A lot of people might use it to punish victorious opponents.

But on the positive side it could also encourage people to play with some dignity. Like not flaming your opponent, or letting your teammate finish his 1v1 before you interfere in brawls.
I am in favour of it.

the flaming part would be the problem itself: a crybaby loses, then flames his opponent and then vote ''dishonor''.
about the brawl thing, i think that people should stop making rules by its own; i mean i would not interfere but someone could, and it's part of the game. he should not be ''reported'' for that.
also let's say that for honor becomes a eSport, and you are playing in a tounament with a very good cash prize, why should you not interfere in 1v1s if that could lead you to victory and therefore cash?

[CutLifeKeef]

It's gonn be a great and no matter what

[GreyHound501]

the flaming part would be the problem itself: a crybaby loses, then flames his opponent and then vote ''dishonor''.
about the brawl thing, i think that people should stop making rules by its own; i mean i would not interfere but someone could, and it's part of the game. he should not be ''reported'' for that.
also let's say that for honor becomes a eSport, and you are playing in a tounament with a very good cash prize, why should you not interfere in 1v1s if that could lead you to victory and therefore cash?

Because in a perfect world honor wins over greed. And while I do not do a 2v1 in brawls because I find it dishonorable. There is nothing wrong with tag teaming and swapping out

[B3N--]

I say no, because, in my experience, someone can say "honorable fight" at the start of the battle, and when they smelt the defeat come, go un-honorable and finally win (because you was thinking honorably)


When that will happend to you, you will see the thing on another side, sadly.

My mantra is "never trust anyone" ; and with that, no surprise.


And i don't like the idea to put people in category, because that can be abused when the anger of the defeat come