🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #21
    Originally Posted by UbiNoty Go to original post
    Hello! We're currently hard at work in the middle of preparing for the CB - and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!
    Oooh I have a feeling its in the works for later game updates, I can be wrong. Right now this game For Honor is epic badass (sorry for potty mouth). I been following it since I heard about it..Hehe I hope we as the players will fight against the Dev. Team have an event for elite loot and so on..just an idea..
    Share this post

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by Ribberr Go to original post
    For Honor really needs ranked matches and leaderboards for the more competitive players to keep an interest. Like sure, doing duels and other modes is fun but when there is no bigger goal to achieve it might get boring for some people. I personally would really like ranked matches since then you can see how good you are compared to other players and you seem to progress forward in the game -> "Yey got to silver 3 rank! Damn i'm good."
    I got to rank silver 2 for my Kensei
    Share this post

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by UbiNoty Go to original post
    Hello! We're currently hard at work in the middle of preparing for the CB - and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!
    This game ment to be a game with ranked system. And im a little bit confused about this post..."and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!" No offens, but then what will be the goal in this game??? Another perfect example, that Ubisoft allways brings up something shiny, but 2 weeks after the release it is nothing else but an empty bottle. And this kind of game without a ranked system is......
    It was exactly the same with The Division, great oportunity for a really good game, but after 2 weeks of gameplay, you couldn't do anything ingame, because it had no end game content. Im afraid that For Honor will be the same, and i don't want to, because this game is full with potencial, but after this kind of pronouncement "no decisions have been made yet" makes me really nervous.
    Im gonna still preorder the game, but it was obvious for me, that if you have 1v1, 2v2, and moba(ish) gamestyle in a game, then it MUST contain ranked system/leaderboards without question. Im really not sure what was the goal for the developers with this game without ranked system! I still can't belive it!
    And the next problem, if the developers didn't even made the decision yet, it means, they didn't even talked about it, and if the community will push them for ranked system/leaderboards (and they will), then they must hurry to do that, and it will be lashed-together...:S

    Damn, i was thinking this will be the next League of Legends for me. (im not talking about the gamestyle, im talking about that you can play with it on every single day and it's not boring)
    Im not bury this game yet, because i want it to be succesful, but damn...i have to wait at least 6-12 months till i can play with the game what i imagined. Because In a few months the community can tell to the developers what kind of game they want to play in long term, and they gonna make it but im afraid it will be too late, and they gonna lose most of the part of the community.

    Anyway i wish the best for this game, coz i really liked what i've seen so far.
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by supremechi Go to original post
    This game ment to be a game with ranked system. And im a little bit confused about this post..."and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!" No offens, but then what will be the goal in this game??? Another perfect example, that Ubisoft allways brings up something shiny, but 2 weeks after the release it is nothing else but an empty bottle. And this kind of game without a ranked system is......
    It was exactly the same with The Division, great oportunity for a really good game, but after 2 weeks of gameplay, you couldn't do anything ingame, because it had no end game content. Im afraid that For Honor will be the same, and i don't want to, because this game is full with potencial, but after this kind of pronouncement "no decisions have been made yet" makes me really nervous.
    Im gonna still preorder the game, but it was obvious for me, that if you have 1v1, 2v2, and moba(ish) gamestyle in a game, then it MUST contain ranked system/leaderboards without question. Im really not sure what was the goal for the developers with this game without ranked system! I still can't belive it!
    And the next problem, if the developers didn't even made the decision yet, it means, they didn't even talked about it, and if the community will push them for ranked system/leaderboards (and they will), then they must hurry to do that, and it will be lashed-together...:S

    Damn, i was thinking this will be the next League of Legends for me. (im not talking about the gamestyle, im talking about that you can play with it on every single day and it's not boring)
    Im not bury this game yet, because i want it to be succesful, but damn...i have to wait at least 6-12 months till i can play with the game what i imagined. Because In a few months the community can tell to the developers what kind of game they want to play in long term, and they gonna make it but im afraid it will be too late, and they gonna lose most of the part of the community.

    Anyway i wish the best for this game, coz i really liked what i've seen so far.
    Totally agree with that. I just cannot understand why you would release an AAA game without a feature which is important to a lot of people. It reminds of BLizzard and "Do you really want chat channels?". Is it ignorance, supidity or just a time thing? Imo Ranked should have been way higher in the priority list.
    The game will get stale for a lot of people after the first 2-3 months and ranked would keep a lot of those people.
    Share this post

  5. #25
    I am not a good player, medicore., but i love ranked. Pure motivation. I will wait with buy till the implent it. Until that, i stay with Siege.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #26
    Ranked and leaderboards or the game will die before the launch of the first DLC
    Share this post

  7. #27

    Disappointed

    I played the Beta now and it has no leaderboards yet which makes me feel like its a waste of time especially the 1on1. Without any competetion i can also play Angry Birds or some other nonsense game. Im praying they will implement it in the final game or in the future!!!!
    Share this post

  8. #28

    So we do make SOME decisions on money

    Originally Posted by UbiNoty Go to original post
    Hello! We're currently hard at work in the middle of preparing for the CB - and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!
    Let the ranked games be separated and have rewards. You already have a dumb K/D/A like a shooter. Let's not make every game have call of duty stamps please? Then you get players that won't cap things or do objectives because of K/D. If you are going to do to it make punishments losing and high kills, I.e they can't just go to brawl or can't just do domination it's a non-grouped random and they are penalized for backing out, and it's back out right when they find out what type of game it is.
    Share this post

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by UbiNoty Go to original post
    Hello! We're currently hard at work in the middle of preparing for the CB - and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!
    Can I ask how is this possible? It should be already in even if we dont get acces it in beta, this game is crave for ladder to be competitive. I mean this is a pvp game the content in it to fight against other players. Dedicated players whos focusing on 1 class will reach a level when they beats most of the ppl. At that point why shoud they log in when they arent matched against players whos around the same skill level? Im aware about that when you are que in we see system is looking for if i recall correctly high medium etc skill level ppl. How the system determines whos high medium etc skill level, and if you are using an algorythm for it why cant we get a ladder or leaderboard which we can climb. From my point of view i had 2 days heavy testing on this game and almost got 2. reputetion level on my warden with a solid 47item level. At that point i never seen anybody whos got sameish item level. Most of the 4v4 games I've been matched with 1-2 1Xppl and rest was 1-2-3. When I got my rep 1 lvl pretty early and got a 3-0 victory i got flame as well when i played against ppl whos were only 3-4 level on their character. I belive its annoying to play against somebody whos more exped and beats you but it is annyoing too getting the same "yea get a life" "how could on on that lvl r you cheating?" or just they explain how should i **** myself or somebody else... if i would face against ppl whos got the same skill level as me and if it would be a ranked system i would bought this game already.

    The current repution levels not equal with skill cause i met a few rep 1 players whos wasnt nearly that good as few 12-13ish ppl. I want to play against ppl whos on my skill level or even stronger if i get a winning streak i want to meet players whos rly commited to play well and i want to match against them. But my only fear is you thought this would be enough and you wont implement ranked so if i would play this as my main game i would be called on names constantly and while facing newish ppl. I would like to focus on 1on1 i dont realy care some classes are better,faster or etc etc i like the fight very much and the whole combat system but i dont want to be scamed in for promises which will never take place in reality. We saw this too many times, on others overhyped games recently.

    What you got here is good, unique and you can only fail to succeed if you dont see it could be an E-sport game but you have to make a competitive area for it it thats how ppl will stick with it after the hype and thats how you will get ppl whos will be known as proish for honor players/streamers. If you wont do this i think this game will be another one of the list which hold only for 2-3month. Right now If that 2 days i would have been on live i probably pause to play only after 2 days and wait others to catch up cause there is nothing in it to push forward as a cometitive player. If i would commit myself i would pull the items up more higher but why would I do it? The game already says its xy days left from season give me a leaderboard to climb and a reward for those whos participated unique paintings etc something which look cool for only those whos the best xy% on the ranked. Something for the hc gamers aswell please those whos pull the others as well just check when a popular pro streamer switch a game whos following him and look up for him they want to play that game too.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by UbiNoty Go to original post
    ...and while no decisions have been made yet about leaderboards/ranked ladders they're definitely an option!
    Someone please tell me what is going on over at Ubisoft. No leaderboards? No ranks? No dedicated servers? Have any Ubisoft developers ever played an online game?
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post