Moderator
As much as you may or may not want to admit it, both Super and Cortexian are right. Features, whatever they may be, can not be promised or shown without being 100% committed to them becoming a reality. You can say you want a "Subject to Change" trailer, but then you run into the same situations that Division and Rainbow Six had.
Rainbow Six:
Discussion: Rainbow Six will have an actual singleplayer campaign. Angela Bassett was on stage at E3 to discuss it and talk about it before the game came out.
Actuality: Singleplayer was cut and replaced with Situations.
Division:
Discussion: Division will have second screen support with a drone app so that you can join your friends anywhere in the world. There was even a trailer to show its features.
Actuality: The drone app was scrapped just before E3 2015.
Discussion: Division will have multiple Dark Zones and Bases of Operations linked with supply chains between them. There was even a trailer that showed both of these features.
Actuality: One Dark Zone; One Base of Operations.
So, what do you want? A discussion with trailers as evidence months from now, or actually what they promised and what theyve shown?
[This is a personal opinion.]
Senior Member
I don't remember any promises of a campaign for Siege. Following that game before release people just assumed it would have a campaign because Rainbow Six titles have always had campaigns - the knowledge there wouldn't be one only came out a month or two before the beta if memory serves.
I'm not much of a PvP guy. In fact, I have practically zero interest in PvP. This does not change the fact that Ghost Recon's PvP is beloved by many, many, many people and should be considered a mandatory feature. People just want an answer on if there is PvP or not - a simple yes or no so they can either get on board or move on already. The time for massive sweeping changes to the game should be over...PvP is either in or it's not at this point.
Either way, if it isn't in then I really have to question the judgement of the developers. Did you really think a GR that didn't have PvP would be welcomed by open arms by the community? Really?
Banned
I would agree with all of it if this was at the beginning of the game being in development because you can not please everyone... Good for you Ubisoft.
Now, 2 months, almost to the date, that the game will be released, UBI wants many of us to believe there are still developing the game? OK, say that is true (highly unlikely but what the hell, I like assumptions), the question and the point is that THEY ARE EITHER GOING TO HAVE PvP OR NOT! This is like talking to a politician and he is answering a simple question with multiple vague questions of his own.
Also, Solo Campaign was promoted to be in the game and still, nothing has been shown about it. You want us to believe they are still working on it so they can't show a real gameplay video of it? Or is it more that now is when they will start working on it as a last resort and thought.
If it was true that they want to keep secrets about what will be in the game and what wouldn't be so people don't complain then... how do you suppose they will cover the fact that all the BS hype trailer cinematics won't be in the game and yet, that is all they have shown? Oh wait, that is totally different because that is purely for marketing purposes? Nah man, either man up or shut up. Again... BS excuses when it suits them.
Senior Member
The Division will be expanding it's Dark Zone. If the player numbers don't drop they will be expanding the surroundings of the current map and perhaps have another base.
You are right the Drone App was cancelled, but that is nothing compared to a major game mode such as PvP. At the end of the day not many people, or nobody complained about that particular feature missing. Nor did it affect sales. Can you say the same thing about not including a PvP mode?
We are almost at the end of development, it should be pretty clear if PvP will make it into the game or not.
GR Wildlands hasn't even announced what the Season Pass offers, sounds like a joke.
Senior Member
Well the moderators and community devs here are only moderators, if they know anything they aren't allowed to release any information without permission from the developers. So it's not their fault.Originally Posted by GiveMeTactical Go to original post
Banned
I meant UBISOFT and not moderators, chosen ones, wannabe Guardians of all that is UBI or even CMs.Originally Posted by mezzatron Go to original post
Member
Ubisoft broke my heart when they removed the R6 campaign. It's the reason why I picked the game up a year later on sale for 20 bucks as opposed to buying it at release. Please dont ever do that again Ubisoft.Originally Posted by DigitalHitmann Go to original post
Moderator
Volunteer Moderator
