🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The Division forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #11
    's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Florida.
    Posts
    3,741
    That's only if you assume 1.6 is Last Stand rather than Last Stand being a totally separate TU.
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Well based on what he said in the video and if its true then the title of last stand would make sense and tells me they are basically taking from ghost recon phantoms and putting it into the division as a 4v4 last stand game mode. If this is the case then it just continues to show how little originality is going into the creation of new content in this game but falls in line with there end game motive being PVP as they have never said PVE was ever there intention for end game. They have always been very clear about there intentions for this game and end game and that PVP was and always will be the main focus of this game, now if we could just get PVP that was fun and made sense instead of the current DZ garbage.
    Share this post

  3. #13
    pbar69's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    19
    My guess is the same as before the data mined info came out !! NO ONE HAS A CLUE AND WE WILL NOT KNOW UNTIL PTS IS COMPLETE AND 1.6 IS RELEASED ! with that being said even if 1/2 of those things are implemented plus other stuff we don't know of, and they fix some issues they have and some other new stuff , I believe people will be very happy !! Happy new year everyone !! GO GIANTS !
    Share this post

  4. #14
    I generally don't put much stock in leaks, as I find that they're wrong as often as they're right.

    However, having said that, IF Last Stand is PVP oriented, then unfortunately, I'm done with this game.
    I wasn't looking for more PVP, but rather, more PVE with a continued storyline, expanded map, and expanded activities and missions. If that was never their intention, that's fine, but it won't hold my interest, and it will lose many others as well. PVP and PVE players may overlap, but in my experience, almost all PVP players will play PVE content, while only some PVE players will play the PVP content. That doesn't bode well for keeping the player base...
    Besides that, this game simply doesn't have a good enough PVP design to be a PVP oriented game anyway.

    If they go that way, it's a foolish direction to take the game imo.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  5. #15
    Originally Posted by X3holy3 Go to original post
    Yeah but PVE has gotten everything in the game so far. You can't get underground surivial, incursions and a few months later ask Massive to create a complex raid. The DLC's have been pre-determined before the game even released. Maybe a raid in division 2
    Can't argue that but...how should we interpret that when the PVE is still awful?
    Share this post

  6. #16
    I imagine most people have the Season Pass so have already paid for the DLC whatever happens. There isn't much pressure to release quality DLC for the sake of the minority who buy each part separately.

    With Wildlands due out shortly too they're probably quite happy letting Division die off for now.
    Share this post

  7. #17
    Originally Posted by RickHolt Go to original post
    I imagine most people have the Season Pass so have already paid for the DLC whatever happens. There isn't much pressure to release quality DLC for the sake of the minority who buy each part separately.

    With Wildlands due out shortly too they're probably quite happy letting Division die off for now.
    As am I
    Share this post

  8. #18
    YodaMan 3D's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    8,108
    Originally Posted by Furinol Go to original post
    As am I
    Why stay on the forums, if you a don't care if it dies?
    Share this post

  9. #19
    Originally Posted by DMF-Lokiey Go to original post
    Well based on what he said in the video and if its true then the title of last stand would make sense and tells me they are basically taking from ghost recon phantoms and putting it into the division as a 4v4 last stand game mode. If this is the case then it just continues to show how little originality is going into the creation of new content in this game but falls in line with there end game motive being PVP as they have never said PVE was ever there intention for end game. They have always been very clear about there intentions for this game and end game and that PVP was and always will be the main focus of this game, now if we could just get PVP that was fun and made sense instead of the current DZ garbage.
    When did they say PvP was the main focus?
    Share this post

  10. #20
    Originally Posted by nuclearbroccoli Go to original post
    I generally don't put much stock in leaks, as I find that they're wrong as often as they're right.

    However, having said that, IF Last Stand is PVP oriented, then unfortunately, I'm done with this game.
    I wasn't looking for more PVP, but rather, more PVE with a continued storyline, expanded map, and expanded activities and missions. If that was never their intention, that's fine, but it won't hold my interest, and it will lose many others as well. PVP and PVE players may overlap, but in my experience, almost all PVP players will play PVE content, while only some PVE players will play the PVP content. That doesn't bode well for keeping the player base...
    Besides that, this game simply doesn't have a good enough PVP design to be a PVP oriented game anyway.

    If they go that way, it's a foolish direction to take the game imo.
    I think they'll be PVE content added. This should be a rather beefy DLC considering the other two offered very little, in terms of content variety. The Last Stand will be exactly that unless some PVE and PvP content additions are made.
    Share this post