🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The Division forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #11
    They didn't do anything with the Mask, it's not invisible.

    What you're asking doesn't make sense, and you're not entitled to a refund cause the images of the content clearly show the kevlar on top.
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Oh, I see now, just saw the other OP post.. I'm arguing with the 12 years old guy who just made another post saying "I was expecting to be able to create a Lara Croft looking character".
    So you don't want a body armor because you want to see boobs ...

    Not going to happen.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #13
    SKORPIQN's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,187
    Mask isn't invisible, it's not equiped in the LZ because it's not contaminated.
    Share this post

  4. #14
    Veldaz's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    614
    If anything I think we need helmets that cover the whole head. And full body armor.

    As I say that I know Ubisoft would turn it into DLC as if it was a free to play game that needed to survive on microtransactions. So scratch that.

    And it's called immersion. This is an RPG game. Why not have invisible weapons while we're at it?

    Also, letting the players wear the masks regardless of area would be neat. If nothing else just because it can look bad ***. This way it's even more immersive and you'd have to actually think about putting on a mask if you're under fire near a contaminated area. Should probably be some sort of down side for wearing it too long or something to balance that out so people don't just wear it 24/7. Longer skill cooldowns maybe?

    As for chest armor, if you want to not wear that then it better be visible. And I know I'll be aiming for the exposed chest. It's an RPG games. It needs to be immersive. Long as the colors don't clash with my clothes (say, bright blue) then I'm fine. Perhaps if we could change the color of the armor or something. But again, I'm sure that would be turned into DLC. So I'm against that idea unless it's free.

    Seriously, the game has more problems then fashion right now.
    Share this post

  5. #15
    Goo-Goo-Man's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    DZ
    Posts
    4,534
    Originally Posted by King_Hadu Go to original post
    even though you in reality have it equipped its invisible most of the time.
    ROFL

    Ever wonder what that is dangling from your arm when you're in the LZ?

    Correct!

    It's your mask.

    Invisible.......pfffffttttttt.........
    Share this post

  6. #16
    FilteredName's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,335
    Originally Posted by King_Hadu Go to original post
    The mask will only be visible in Dark Zone even though you in reality have it equipped its invisible most of the time.

    I bought DLC clothing in the store and when I put it on the Chest Plate covers it and simply ruins it.

    Please fix this thank you. If not I don't see the point in buying anymore DLC clothing.
    I feel same way but about my pants, my rear looks real good as I'm running along but stupid pants cover it up, its pointless having my rear in this game, fix it please
    Share this post

  7. #17
    sgtnogo's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,356
    Not to mention, you can never get Steam to refund anything, even if the reason is legit! It's easier to get a call from Steam, than a refund! And they don't even have telephones. So good luck on that one!
    Share this post

  8. #18
    Cadillac-Jack's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Deepest darkest Chernarus
    Posts
    8,059
    Originally Posted by King_Hadu Go to original post
    Thanks it has been a while since I read something this moronic.

    Hopefully Mr Trump can address this failed state of Public Education so we won't see more posts like yours in future since clearly you completely missed the point here.

    Dear Ubisoft I would like a refund on my DLC cosmetics.
    The guy answered your question in a decent normal manner and in the correct way with true facts.

    You then decide to insult him over it because you are upset you've spent money on cosmetic items that don't quite show up the way you want them to be.

    If I were you sonny jim i'd grow up a little and be a bit more mature about it do your research on said items, there is bound to be a youtube vid on how they look once worn then you could have had an idea on how they look before you buy them.Heck it shows you exactly what it's like in the store picture

    It's your own damn fault for buying them and not doing the research.

    PS: no i'm not American before you decide to throw another tantrum/insult.

    PPS: OP are you old enough to be in this forum or game.
    Share this post

  9. #19
    Originally Posted by Reaper-Two Go to original post
    Your "face mask" is not invisible, it's always attached to your backpack and you are using it when entering to a contaminated area. It's logical.
    Your bulletproof vest should be always on your character since is always needed. This are heavy kevlars which can't be hidden with your t-shirt as some paper police vests
    I don't see how it makes something "ugly".
    I get your argument for realism, and how it would be unrealistic to "hide" armour parts, but to be fair, all arguments for realism went out the window when an enemy using a hoodie and cap as armour takes 3 shots with a shotgun at point blank range to die. We could even add to the argument about the realism of pulling a ballistic shield, or something the size of the extended shield out of your rectum (I know it's supposed to be the backpack). I personally like the idea of being able to colour code your armour so they complement your clothing better, for instance, my main char has the black windbreaker with the shoulder pads but the brown woodland camo of the alpha-bridge backpack just looks off, so the ability to "hide" the backpack or preferential for me the ability to apply the skin from one of the other backpacks would be great. Anyway, that's my opinion.
    Share this post

  10. #20
    Originally Posted by hadleighbod Go to original post
    I get your argument for realism, and how it would be unrealistic to "hide" armour parts, but to be fair, all arguments for realism went out the window when an enemy using a hoodie and cap as armour takes 3 shots with a shotgun at point blank range to die. We could even add to the argument about the realism of pulling a ballistic shield, or something the size of the extended shield out of your rectum (I know it's supposed to be the backpack). I personally like the idea of being able to colour code your armour so they complement your clothing better, for instance, my main char has the black windbreaker with the shoulder pads but the brown woodland camo of the alpha-bridge backpack just looks off, so the ability to "hide" the backpack or preferential for me the ability to apply the skin from one of the other backpacks would be great. Anyway, that's my opinion.
    LOL Exactly why I didn't respond to these idiotic ******ed posts and Triggered SJW losers on this forum.

    Bunch of uneducated losers talking about Realism is why we can't make the armor invisible.

    Yeah its so realistic for a guy to take 100 bullets to the head and not even scratch or how realistic is it to press a T button to revive a dead corpse or the best part wearing a glove gives your gun armor piercing.

    LOL I just sit by and watch a bunch of regressive leftwing lunatics cry over my post and realize just how bad Public Education has failed. To think idiots here can't tell the difference between a video game and real life is sad or least of all a fantasy video game like this where literally nothing is realistic.

    Or how about the fact that this game has ZERO bullet travel time? yeah thats so realistic right? OMG I can't believe people in society can be this uneducated to even think about comparing this to anything remotely realistic is this the best that consoles actually has when it comes to realism?

    Uneducated dimwits should go play Arma 3 if they want realism. But I bet they are console scrubs and couldn't land a single shot in Arma 3 when I want realism I fire up Arma 3. I do not play this console cod like game for realism not even remotely close.
    Share this post