Theres a fair bit of negativity on the forums lately so just thought I'd share this article to give R6S and the team some credit for such a great game. Yes it has flaws....but still head and shoulders better than any other FPS out there.
http://kotaku.com/rainbow-six-siege-...oot-1786064981
This article is garbage, especially considering the gap between Siege and Vegas 2. Competitors such as Bf4, and COD at least function properly making them better, than Seige already in that regard.
The only thing that makes Siege stand out is the over-saturated casual fps market. People are tired of the same old thing, and since Siege tries to imitate a Rainbow Six game it just happens to be a little different.
The problem is that Siege isn't different enough. It's a wannabe Rainbow Six game.
Ha ha!! Have you played the recent cod demo......now that's a laughing stock!! You clearly have no idea what You are talking about!
I would rather play a brilliant game with flaws than sit on game that's now made for 10 year olds just because it runs well.
The last dlc for cod was running around with boxing gloves on ha ha ha ha ha ha!!
And he says R6S is for casual gamers....your a comic!
I agree the game does have problems, as any other multiplayer game does. Although some of the issues I see people moaning about on here me and my friends have never encountered. Many people exaggerate just to make it sound worse. And many of these people don't currently play the game which gives them no right to complain. Like I said fully agree with the article, a fantastic game with issues.
I love this game. not because it's a shooter. but because it intergrates strategy with tactical Realism. to cut things short it makes you question every decision you make every secound of the game. should i take a risk and take the shorter rout to combat the enemy with limited paths? or should i run right around to the other side of the map and take a stealthy approach? this is the very reason RB6 Eclipses other FPS games of this time. Which is why it makes the game so great.
Gonna bump this because I agree with the video link assessment of the game. What I am never going to understand though. Is people talking about Vegas 2 as if its some sort of realistic game. You dont have 3rd person in real life guys. Most mil sim groups worth their salt in Arma dont allow 3rd person etc etc... I am actually glad Ubisoft canceled "Freedom Liberty America Rainbow, but not in a gay manner, not that there is anything wrong with that" the game in order to make Siege instead.Originally Posted by SCOTTSON1 Go to original post
I wouldn't put it past Ubisoft to pay someone to do a praise article for them to make them look less sucky.
B.t.w. that leads me to my next assessment, the article never said...
"R6S Best Shooter For Decade(s)"
-as dipicted by the shill OP.
If it did say decades that would put the game in Rainbow Six 3 territory, and Siege is blasted out of the water at that point.
It's pretty sad when an ancient game like Rainbow Six 3 is better by far, than a game that came out between a decade, or two after it.
Here's a few more opinions from sites regarding the game itself....some even say it's the best Rainbow six has ever been.
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/rev...-years-finest/
http://www.pcgamesn.com/tom-clancys-...iginal-shooter
http://www.itechpost.com/articles/27...rst-person.htm
http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/its-t...ooter-ever-855
As the stats Show the game is growing over time with more people playing it. The developers must be doing something right!!