DEVS - 3 Legit issues that need Attention REVISED | Forums

[x_KingSolomon_x]

Please no. guard breaks should be meant to break an opponents guard not an opponents attack. If you could guard break heavy attacks then there is no point of them.

Not true at all. It makes it more challenging. You mean to tell me you were watching a warden double overhand and etween strikes DID NOT hit that GB? there is like an hour between swings. You you can dodge. But I'm speaking about interrupting there attack.

It would make heavy attack combos more risky and more rewarding. My raider with a 3 hit heavy.. you would barely survive it does so much damage. Plus your dealing with the range and human error. I honestly do believe my opponent deserves to brake in between my heavy strikes.

This will most likely not happen..

[x_KingSolomon_x]

Sounds like we might run into the same old issues we have on the division .These are team based games ,so how you build for a solo is a bloody good question ,especially for a very close combat game.The point i want to get is this ,if there is no room for a solo player this must be made very clear from the start .Also ,so frigging much fun best Alpha every played.Also my 1st .Lolo.Still excellent game,and not 1 frigging camper anywhere .Lolo

Well they are completely repairing the division. Check out skill up's video on patch 1.4. The division might be great again. Just don't hold your breath lol.

And yes, exactly. With these super tight maps teams with communication vs a team of no mic randoms. The randoms will most likely fall to the other.

It's natural in this game mode. To feel like you should split up and strategically defend and attack certain places. Alot of the time your are in the same boat. Even when working with a team. People always head out in singles. "I'm going to A." "Or I'm headed down to middle." That is in a way solo in appearance. So WTF when you get down there all 4 and camping B. And this only happens on river, overwatch. Even when this does happen on citadel. It's usually end game. Or the opposite side has deliberately decided to scrap winning. And just be a gank squad.

[iHunny]

Not true at all. It makes it more challenging. You mean to tell me you were watching a warden double overhand and etween strikes DID NOT hit that GB? there is like an hour between swings. You you can dodge. But I'm speaking about interrupting there attack.

It would make heavy attack combos more risky and more rewarding. My raider with a 3 hit heavy.. you would barely survive it does so much damage. Plus your dealing with the range and human error. I honestly do believe my opponent deserves to brake in between my heavy strikes.

This will most likely not happen..

One can already block and parry the slow heavy attacks. Why give them one more tool to deal with them? It would render heavy attacks useless.

[Rollricked]

Not true at all. It makes it more challenging. You mean to tell me you were watching a warden double overhand and etween strikes DID NOT hit that GB? there is like an hour between swings. You you can dodge. But I'm speaking about interrupting there attack.

It would make heavy attack combos more risky and more rewarding. My raider with a 3 hit heavy.. you would barely survive it does so much damage. Plus your dealing with the range and human error. I honestly do believe my opponent deserves to brake in between my heavy strikes.

This will most likely not happen..

No, it would make it ******ed. It would make people just flat out NOT use heavy attacks whatsoever, since "hell, they'll be countered anyway". So you'd have people running around spamming light attacks, and already OP stuff like Warden would be even OPer.

[Mr.Riot]

Not true at all. It makes it more challenging. You mean to tell me you were watching a warden double overhand and etween strikes DID NOT hit that GB? there is like an hour between swings. You you can dodge. But I'm speaking about interrupting there attack.

It would make heavy attack combos more risky and more rewarding. My raider with a 3 hit heavy.. you would barely survive it does so much damage. Plus your dealing with the range and human error. I honestly do believe my opponent deserves to brake in between my heavy strikes.

This will most likely not happen..

You said there is like an hour between swings. I assume you are trying to say the attacks are slow. With that being said why the heck would that help your case. I agree heavy attacks are very telegraphed and can already be dodged. SO WHY WOULD YOU WANT THE GUARD BREAK TO ABLE TO GO THROUGH HEAVY ATTACKS.

Yes i have hit the guard break at the wrong time and got punished enough for me to understand not to just casually throw out GB. Thats how it should be. You throw a guard break while they are not guarding u get hit.

Heavy attacks are already risky. Especially the raider unblockables. They are so telegraphed that you can just dodge backward or the opposite direction get some guaranteed hits. Also human error is not a good way to argue your point because that is always gonna be an element in video games (an element generally in life as well).

In a way human error is relied on to win the fight. Why do you have the cancel attacks? To attempt to get your opponent to react to the feint so he can be punished.