Yes, I do
No, I don't
I don't care
It's literally just SJW pandering that there are females at all in this game. Two of the three factions did not have enough female warriors to warrant their appearance at all, and even vikings didn't have a fraction of the female warriors they had IRL. The fact that I *have* to play a female peacekeeper/valk/nobushi when they simply didn't exist in real life is absolutely ridiculous.
Were male peacekeepers and valkyries a thing in real life?Originally Posted by towards0 Go to original post
Is this game based on a real life period where there was a three-way war between Vikings, Knights, and Samurai?
Are you mixing up "based on" and "influenced by"?
It isn't SJW pandering to have strong female characters in your fictional universe.
Originally Posted by hypomaniac0 Go to original postOriginally Posted by CoyoteKing1 Go to original postNo, I just don't buy the ****ing book.Originally Posted by PrimaGoosa Go to original post
If you bought a book that had a huge male warrior on the cover, would you be surprised, pissed, and confused as to why the main character was a woman.
This. Honestly, it's not 'pandering' to give people the option to play as whatever gender they indentify with or prefer the look of.Originally Posted by PrimaGoosa Go to original post
It'd be either laziness or pandering to only have male characters, in order to save the feelings of sensitive neckbeards like the poster you were responding to, who throw their toys out the pram as soon as they perceive that they're not the dominant group and voice in any theatre of discussion, for once in the entitled ****ing cakewalks they call their lives.
I bet the user you responded to takes issue with having options for skin colour too.