Darkzone rework | Forums

[RS_Deadeye]

If there was an option to choose, I would choose pve dz simply because i don't care about pvp, if.. we can call this pvp.
Currently I am rank 87 in the dz, which i got mostly while soloing the DZ, sometimes with a friend, but it got annoying getting killed just because, while I am not interested at all in pvping.
I am mostly doing the HVT missions in solo, the person who I used to play with is not playing anomore. And gear in pve (other then challenge incursions) is very limited.

[SoldadoX4]

LMAO all these weak PVE players want a toned down DZ....LOL these threads are useless really since DZ works as intended. They give these PVE whiners HVT with the patch but that's still not enough?? I love DZ after the patch more risk and much better rewards I love the challenge. I'm sure you all have heard this before...GIT GUD and adapt because DZ is not changing......."PVE - Pure DZ grind without rogue hassle." that was the funniest one.... LMFAO.

[teksuo1]

without the rogue option ; dz 5-6 would be unplayable. The landmarks would be always greyed out and there's nothing you could do to take over the run. Playing "try to tag the boss" forever.. no thanks.

The pvp is vital to the DZ in it's current state.


Guaranteed all those crying for a pve DZ would be crying still if it were to happen.

[NitroMidgets]

without the rogue option ; dz 5-6 would be unplayable. The landmarks would be always greyed out and there's nothing you could do to take over the run. Playing "try to tag the boss" forever.. no thanks.

The pvp is vital to the DZ in it's current state.


Guaranteed all those crying for a pve DZ would be crying still if it were to happen.

Why? Wouldn't a PVE version be their own instance unlike now where it is shared with others? It would just be an extension of the PVE world that we have now, only there would actually be **** to do in it.

[SpazzticZeal]

Why? Wouldn't a PVE version be their own instance unlike now where it is shared with others? It would just be an extension of the PVE world that we have now, only there would actually be **** to do in it.

And what would the logistics of that entail for 1-4 player instances all over the DZ???

[woksu]

LMAO all these weak PVE players want a toned down DZ....LOL these threads are useless really since DZ works as intended. They give these PVE whiners HVT with the patch but that's still not enough?? I love DZ after the patch more risk and much better rewards I love the challenge. I'm sure you all have heard this before...GIT GUD and adapt because DZ is not changing......."PVE - Pure DZ grind without rogue hassle." that was the funniest one.... LMFAO.

The DZ works almost as intented they'll just need to fix few things..

Flamers/grenade damages, reducing the health on NPC's so you actually have ammo to go rogue and stuff when opportunity arrives.
They should also fix the predatory talent on weapons as soon as possible also.

[NitroMidgets]

And what would the logistics of that entail for 1-4 player instances all over the DZ???

You mean just removing the gates and having the game flow freely from one area to another just as the PVE world already works? I don't really see how that is any different then the logistics of managing the DZ, the players joining, players leaving, logging the actions, extractions.

Besides it would allow your DZ to be an opt in PVP only area like an arena. I mean we are told it is hugely popular so according to their own statement it shouldn't hurt the DZ at all but rather make it more attractive to the PVP players because then you can focus just on PVP.

I'd take a balanced PVP arena over the half baked half assed hybrid we have now.

[Zakuaz]

I'm not sure what to vote for.

I like the tense feeling that I get while in the DZ, knowing I need to steer clear of other players or they'll ghost my lonewolf playing arse.

I like 1.2 but holy hell it's a ***** for me as I prefer to play solo. I like the scaled up mobs but I'm stuck in the 201+ lower DZ areas now ( by choice of course since I don't group lol).

I suck bad at PVP in this game. I like the idea of it but since I do not initiate the engagements... I end up melting before I even know wtf is happening and this is post 1.2. I am at 74.3% mitigation and 280k Toughness IIRC, GS205, DZ Rank99 ( RNG is an evil bitz). It just feels the TTK is too fast for me. I understand the importance of getting the jump on someone you intend to take down, so I am torn on what the heck could even fix/change the TTK. Maybe drop all damage modifiers when against other players...or inflate the already existing damage mitigation between players... hell if I know.

There are times where I'd love to get in on some PVP and there are times where I wouldn't mind just shooting at NPCs ( in a DZ setting). You gotta admit the gunplay in this game is fun and the NPCs are nothing to laugh at post 1.2, it seems to entertain me anyway.

Some of you shouldn't be so quick to judge what others may enjoy. No need to be mean about any of this.

[swirl1297]

LMAO all these weak PVE players want a toned down DZ....LOL these threads are useless really since DZ works as intended. They give these PVE whiners HVT with the patch but that's still not enough?? I love DZ after the patch more risk and much better rewards I love the challenge. I'm sure you all have heard this before...GIT GUD and adapt because DZ is not changing......."PVE - Pure DZ grind without rogue hassle." that was the funniest one.... LMFAO.

"The DZ is not changing"

Really? Because it changed in 1.1 and then changed more in 1.2.

Perhaps you should Git a clue.

[reecher]

i'm a huge advocate for a dedicated pvp zone with proper team based pvp missions, ranking, gear, the whole thing.

i would not want to see rogue status be removed from the current DZ though. i would like to see it changed though. no reward for going rouge. or maybe some type of penalty if you.

i think it would be completely bad @ss to have pvp missions like defend and hold or capture and defend.