WTF is going on with the Glaz? | Forums

[PatoAncestral]

Really... Last update just made Glaz an useless and ****ty op.
Whats the point of being a sniper, with one-shot-chance (mostly), if you need 2 or 3 shots to kill someone?
Man... I just shot a Frost in the chest, and she took merely 50 damage. This is really wrong.
You should fix it, or give us a real sniper. It should make a player down with one shot in the chest. ANY OPERATOR, except for rook and doc.

[Carnor-Jaxx]

Really... Last update just made Glaz an useless and ****ty op.
Whats the point of being a sniper, with one-shot-chance (mostly), if you need 2 or 3 shots to kill someone?
Man... I just shot a Frost in the chest, and she took merely 50 damage. This is really wrong.
You should fix it, or give us a real sniper. It should make a player down with one shot in the chest. ANY OPERATOR, except for rook and doc.

Glaz has never taken anyone down in 1 shot unless it was a headshot. Most games operate on this system for snipers and I see no issues with 2 chests, or 3 if your all over the place and 1 for the head.

[GBE]

Glaz has never taken anyone down in 1 shot unless it was a headshot. Most games operate on this system for snipers and I see no issues with 2 chests, or 3 if your all over the place and 1 for the head.

CSGO has AWP, bolt action sniper rifle that takes down an enemy in anything but feet.

In order to balance that out, it has a hefty price so people wanting to play the weapon have to be clever with their ingame economy. Also, it gives only 1/6 of the kill reward money.

If you really want that kind of a rifle, it should only be available in mid-game (round 4), and be available to each team only once, resetting afterwards in overtime.

[TidalSpiral]

His recoil isn't that bad either, getting the two shot isn't so hard.

[NeoVidia]

It has, and still does in close range if it is in the chest. At high range though, it takes 2-3 shots. Anyways, yeah go for head shots, always the case, whatever the operator.

[Udonitron]

I agree something is up, however.
Glaz's gun does 3+ times the damage per shot that everyone else's guns do so regardless of where they are shot that damage modifier should be 3x the amount.
He used to, 2 months ago when I was using him more, get 1 shot kills with his marksman rifle from the waist up and was void of multipliers due to his gun doing such high damage.
180 base damage with 153 silenced should 1 shot kill from the waist up, every time minus Rook.

[I Redemptionx I]

I agree something is up, however.
Glaz's gun does 3+ times the damage per shot that everyone else's guns do so regardless of where they are shot that damage modifier should be 3x the amount.
He used to, 2 months ago when I was using him more, get 1 shot kills with his marksman rifle from the waist up and was void of multipliers due to his gun doing such high damage.
180 base damage with 153 silenced should 1 shot kill from the waist up, every time minus Rook.

You know those stats aren't even remotely accurate, right?

I mean it's obvious by the fact that Glazs rifle obv. Doesn't inflict 100+ damage each shot haha

I haven't noticed a difference and he's my top operators at 28 hours.

[Udonitron]

I realize, hence me saying "should".
My point was it sure seemed he did do more damage back in Dec and Jan vs where he stands now.

[I Redemptionx I]

I agree something is up, however.
Glaz's gun does 3+ times the damage per shot that everyone else's guns do so regardless of where they are shot that damage modifier should be 3x the amount.
He used to, 2 months ago when I was using him more, get 1 shot kills with his marksman rifle from the waist up and was void of multipliers due to his gun doing such high damage.
180 base damage with 153 silenced should 1 shot kill from the waist up, every time minus Rook.

I realize, hence me saying "should".
My point was it sure seemed he did do more damage back in Dec and Jan vs where he stands now.

No. You said. His rifle does 180-153 damage (as if fact). Then you said he SHOULD (assuming the former statement was true - which is a false assumption) be a 1 shot kill.

he, seemingly, hasn't changed at all, in my opinion.

[Udonitron]

No. You said. His rifle does 180-153 damage (as if fact). Then you said he SHOULD (assuming the former statement was true - which is a false assumption) be a 1 shot kill.

he, seemingly, hasn't changed at all, in my opinion.

Wow, OK whatever dude.
You want to try and win on the internet, good for you.
Fact is I made a point on my statement via saying SHOULD.

Here are factual stats of each gun after launch:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...#gid=109986970