🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The Rainbow Six Siege forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #1

    4 out of 5 games end up 4v5 or 3v5

    Am sick of this game, every fkin game it ends up being either 4v5 or 3v5 because people just rage quit after the 1st round. u have to put in some serious banning to stop this!

    and ur ranking is ****ed up, i just played against a copper 1 and he got 10-1 u tell me thats right?

    you have ruined this game it was better in ****ing beta!
    Share this post

  2. #2
    It doesn't end up like that when you go with a full squad. This is a team game - look to make a team.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    So we can't play the game when we don't have 4 friends online ?
    Ubi just have to punish these leavers, today i played 4 ranked games, 3 were 4v5 or 3v5.
    Peolple have time to leave the lobby when they see the rank of the opponents.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Yea ranked is a bit of a mess, best not to take it too seriously.

    I only played a few today, since they take anywhere from 5-15 to find a game, but each one was either 3v5 or a team of silver and golds vs. a team of diamonds and plats.

    The one thing ranked seems to do well is match my team up with people around my rank level, which is low because I usually solo que. But pretty consistently my team will be pretty close to my rank. We almost always seem to play higher level players though, which I don't mind, but most of the people on my team just aren't at that level.

    TLDR, my ranked experience is usually ****ty because I solo que, and even when I don't I have to wait 10 minutes for a match.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    Its your fault for risking your rank with random players.. Its complaints like yours that made them allow joining ranked games half way through...
    Share this post

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by i_Phasma_i Go to original post
    Its your fault for risking your rank with random players.. Its complaints like yours that made them allow joining ranked games half way through...
    Closed minded ******** from someone who probably doesn't play an actual competitive game. No, Siege doesn't count because it's a ****ing joke.

    1. Showing names and ranks of everyone in the lobby encourages leavers when the teams are mismatched.
    2. Ranked does a great job matching your own team to your rank, but does a god awful job matching the ENEMY team to your rank. Thus you get a lot of lopsided matches with a team of five bronze versus a team of five gold.
    3. There is absolutely no penalty for ditching a match at the last second.
    4. 1 + 2 + 3 means there is a large incentive to leaving matches at the last second to avoid what is a statistically likely loss.
    Bonus # 5. There is no separate queue for full teams versus solo/duo queue, meaning queue dodgers are EVEN MORE likely when they are solo queued and matched against a bunch of kids with matching names.

    Pretending your game is perfect isn't helping anyone. The elitist attitude that "hurr durr no one should play ranked without a team" is not only wrong, it is hurting the game you clearly enjoy playing.

    Edit:

    It is poor game design and a lack of forethought on Ubisoft's part that lead to players getting matched into ranked games in progress. No one has ever asked for that. No one is asking for that here. You clearly acknowledge an obvious fault in the game, but it baffles me that you would rather blame a completely unrelated complaint for it than hold the developer accountable for their stupid mistakes.
    Share this post