PLEASE dear ubisoft STOP YOUR **** , even iF the game is a demo that run on quad titan SLI , the quad titan pc possesser MUST HAVE SAME GRAPHIC OTHERWISE ITS CALLED CHEATING !!!!!!!!
watch dogs :
E3 2012 super beautiful
Actual game on pc : super ugly and not optimized
Rainbow 6 siege :
E3 2013 stunning visuals , hyper beautiful light effect and detailed map
actual game on pc : visually good but 100x time more ugly in comparaison of the demo
The Division :
E3 2013 stunning visuals , occlusion and details in reflect are amazing , super beautiful menu
future actual game on pc 0 reflection effect , ****ty map , 0 detais compare to the demo
STOP YOUR **** UBISOFT, BE HONEST WITH US OR GIVE US NON UTILIZABLE GRAPHICS SETTING FOR MIDDLE RANGE COMPUTER , OK U RUN ALL THOSE DEMO ON ULTIMATE 10 000$ pc BUT IT ISNT FAIR TO REMOVE ALL THOSE GRAPHICS OPTION ON LAST MINUTE , STOP DOWNGRADE ALL THE GAME PLATFORMS JUST BECAUSE OF CONSOLES TOASTER STOP PC MUST BE BEAUTIFUL IF U TELL US IT WILL BE BEAUTIFUL STOP STOP STOP YOUR **** UBISOFT PLEASE
Did you saw any PC gameplay of the division in the last 2 months ?
The answer is NO. So you can't criticize a game that you never realy saw on PC. Wait for the beta and make your own opinion.
it's true that trailers are beautiful and it's normal it's to sell more games. From what all the community members who were invited in Paris said the game looked like in the trailer but it may change it's a pre-pre-pre-alpha version.
I know that Ubisoft made some stupid things with their recent games. They learn more and more with each games. You can be sceptic and it's totaly understandable.
If you are there it's to help devs with your ideas to improve the game (I don't say that all what is said here will be in the game, devs have always the last words).
But if you think the game is already bad why are you still here ?
He speaks about other games that are out but your take is to critizice him for one that is not out yet? If it quaks like a duck...Originally Posted by SuperBiscotCOT Go to original post
Uhhhmmm, nope, no, sorry... but this is not normal. It is call deceiving your customer and it is illegal... more so when you are force to buy it with no returns.Originally Posted by SuperBiscotCOT Go to original post
So what you are saying is that it is ok for UBI to take your money while they learn to make a good game?Originally Posted by SuperBiscotCOT;11295022I know that Ubisoft made some stupid things with their recent games.[B
You can turn blue in the face telling the devs all the good things they do and in the end it won't matter because there is little they can do if the big wigs decide to launch the game half baked... and that BS about other devs made the other games hence why they sucked is utter bs as well because they all belong to the same company.Originally Posted by SuperBiscotCOT Go to original post
Just like him, i am here lashing out at UBI in the hopes that they see that what they are doing or have done for the past 10 years is NOT ok.Originally Posted by SuperBiscotCOT Go to original post
Bottom line is... you are entitled to your positive opinion if you believe they will eventually learn but he is also entitled to his... more so if those games were paid with his hard earned money.
We don't need a second thread and it's why I answerd like that.
But if you want GiveMe Tactical I can answerd you for all the points you said, but it will be in PM because I don't want these type of thread to pollute the forum, devs are already aware of this, they know that all of us want a polished game.
We've already got a three page thread on people voicing their concerns about a downgrade. Please take this discussion there.
Also, when those of us in the community that played the game at Paris actually played it before it was announced at E3, it looked EXACTLY like the gameplay portions of the trailer. If they downgrade it, they'll have to answer to gamers who have already seem that the game is capable of running at the levels of detail they already showed off in the trailer... There would be no escaping the ridicule...
Also, please search before you post. I literally searched the Wildlands forum for the single word "downgrade" and found the other existing thread in about 3 seconds. Thanks!
Not wrong. I know the exact technical reasons Watch_Dogs was downgraded. I can't get into it because I'm bound by an NDA.Originally Posted by VolumeRX Go to original post
The fact is that downgrades happen for technical reasons. Technical hurdles in the development process that "block" the team from obtaining the performance goals they would like, forcing them to scale back the graphics in order to hit that performance goal.
That's as much as I can say on the subject, it's the truth. Believe me or don't, I'm not your supervisor.
don't break your NDA, But is the reason an obvious one?Originally Posted by Cortexian Go to original post
\My guess is that they downgraded it to make it more aviable to the general public. You can probaly get it to look close to the trailers if you have a $10k pc like they have to devlope them on. It makes sense then to drop it a bit do people on mid range pcs can play it and give them a wider customer spectrum