yes deep down i was hoping for evo 2 . but at the very least i was hoping for a substantial improvement.. sound and graphics go without saying . bike is subjective . so i still see nothing . the jump from hd to evo was ridiculously big and improved. fusion you seem to be happy to pay more for less ? if so enjoy your game .o and your unicorn xOriginally Posted by skycamefalling84 Go to original post
It is not my intention to troll you or anyone and neither was it my intention to insult anyone, like I stated earlier.Originally Posted by BeardinUSA Go to original post
I made a statement which was generally a bit rude, for which I apologized and you were rude towards me in particular and I responded to that. However, it is still not my intention to insult you and I don't want to pick a fight with you, or anything, so please forgive my earlier post, if you will.
Well my intention was initially to respond in a serious manner.Originally Posted by skycamefalling84 Go to original post
But as I was trying to fashion a response and reading things like "Guys stop comparing trials fusion to EVO and HD, instead compare it to a volkswagon golf" I have no idea how to respond to something like that. I would have to explain the entire concept of comparisons just to show why trying to use a completely unrelated comparison as a mean of discrediting a highly analogous comparison makes absolutely no sense. And that is just part of a very long rant, it would have taken an unreasonable amount of time to fashion an adequate response. And for all I know you might be drunk or something so it would have been completely pointless.
But it seems like you are just upset people dont share your love of microtransactions, and im glad you have calmed down a bit and are talking some sense. So maybe I will try to explain to you why people are complaining.
There is no inevitable trend in the industry. Do you remember online passes? How many of your current games have online passes these days? Those went away because enough people complained about them to the point where the added revenue wasnt worth the bad press. If people dont want microtransactions in their games, its important they complain about them as well. Even if they dont go away entirely it will at least send these publishers/developers back to the drawing board to try and figure out how to repackage these things in a more consumer friendly manner.
you said its just cosmetics and we don't have to buy it.Originally Posted by skycamefalling84 Go to original post
but the problem is i want those cosmetics and the community has been asking for more customization options since ages. now as it turns out i won't have them if i have to pay +5$ for each of them.
that sucks big time whether i have the option to ignore it or not.
just bc other ppl have complained about other aspects of the game doesn't make me or others crybabies for disliking this particular change.
if anything this thread is exactly for that.
Agreed. It wouldn't be a big deal if we didn't ask so much for customization. But, that was the one thing we wanted with new bikes and instead we got crappy FMXOriginally Posted by Fazotronic85 Go to original post
Skycamefalling did appologise twice and as i see it , the laws of the internet are that ya shake hands and move on , or if an invitation or gesture of an end to any argument is given it is deemed accepted.
The dude appologised twice ,i think a better man would have spit and shaked , instead of continuing to add aggrevating remarks to thier post. Not cool in my book just not cool at all.
nobody is making a big deal out of it. maybe i shouldn't have said crybabies after he already apologised but more important was to get my point agross.Originally Posted by funktastic- Go to original post
There is no link between customization and FMX, not the same people doing it. Also, FMX brings new players while more customization doesn't.Originally Posted by BJRACINE21 Go to original post
So, this argument is not really relevant.
You should read Shifty's posts and mines and see that we said "It will be possible to get some of them for free but not everything".Originally Posted by Fazotronic85 Go to original post
Also, as I explained in my previous post, I don't think we can be described as "greedy" (I explained why).
However, "I want everything for free" is something that we won't be able to satisfy.
Cheers,
I described in my previous post why it's the most consumer friendly manner to do it. If you have better idea, shoot but the problem is that you don't have the overall knowledge and understanding of the context, but still, maybe something interesting can come out of it.Originally Posted by BeardinUSA Go to original post