1 vs 1 mode- who wants this mode? | Forums

[SerWarhammer]

who thinks like me that a mode1 vs 1 is essential for this game? not one fixed mode but only for some monthly / weekly / annual special events such as tournaments or jousts

[Kinguseless]

Sounds good! I just hope there's also a spectator mode.

[AaronVKeener]

Duel mode. 1vs1 sounds good.

[Warphorntek]

There can be ladder of "x" players trying to defeat winner of last round. It could be awesome if they are sitting or standing somewhere around nad just steping up when its their turn.

[supabeatsbat]

Yes, duel mode is a must indeed

[ShadozeBR]

Every human being that can think reasonably gonna love this mode, it its a must have at final release!

[Eiddard]

I dont even understand why there is a discussion about if 1v1 will be in the game. It is not like the devs developed one of the best dueling system for melee combat with weapons and then say "yeah, we have The Art of Battle system but we dont have a duel 1v1 mode, **** you all".

it would be the stupidiest decission that a dev would do ever.

I dont see the need to discuss that there will be 1v1, and there is already a few posts about it.

[SerWarhammer]

I dont even understand why there is a discussion about if 1v1 will be in the game. It is not like the devs developed one of the best dueling system for melee combat with weapons and then say "yeah, we have The Art of Battle system but we dont have a duel 1v1 mode, **** you all".

it would be the stupidiest decission that a dev would do ever.

I dont see the need to discuss that there will be 1v1, and there is already a few posts about it.

we really need to talk about it. and I'll explain also why. this is a team multiplayer game. a modes 1 vs 1 nullify their goals of creating teams modes. everyone should be playing only mode 1 vs. 1. this is why I say to create this mode only for certain special events.
this mode there must be, all right, but it should not be a fixed mode. only for special events and tournaments organized by ubisoft with prizes for the winning players. MARKETING !!!!
a 1 vs 1 modes there must be repeat only specific times so as to revive every few time, the warmongering spirit of the players and their hunger for glory!


I forgot: DEUS VULT!

[Eiddard]

we really need to talk about it. and I'll explain also why. this is a team multiplayer game. a modes 1 vs 1 nullify their goals of creating teams modes. everyone should be playing only mode 1 vs. 1. this is why I say to create this mode only for certain special events.
this mode there must be, all right, but it should not be a fixed mode. only for special events and tournaments organized by ubisoft with prizes for the winning players. MARKETING !!!!
a 1 vs 1 modes there must be repeat only specific times so as to revive every few time, the warmongering spirit of the players and their hunger for glory!


I forgot: DEUS VULT!

That is actually not true, 1v1 will end up on beeing repetitive, it is a good way to train yourself, but it is not a main game mode for this game. I wouldn't play 1v1 that much, because only mechanical skill works there. I rather play the Dominion that they show, you need to stratagize, you have to be good in 1v1, 1v2 and sometimes 1v3, you need to know when to kill minions or capture points, it has a depth in strategy that 1v1 doesn't have, making it more fun to play and to watch.

For a competitive scene(which the game seems to aim to have one) Dominion suits far better, no one wants to see tournaments of people just doing 1v1, people want to see teams playing coordinatly, etc.

And you can argue that there is actually tournaments of 1v1 videogames, like Street Fighter or Tekken, well that is true, but those games have such a deep combat mechanic that allows for 1v1 to be fun to watch, well, fun enough, is not like Fighting Games Scene is close to MOBA or FPS scene.

At the end, The Art of Battle mechanics, are great, but not deep enough for just 1v1 beeing the main gamemode, at least I dont see it.

People will rather play an objective gamemode where they will be able to win based on decision making and not only in mechanical skill. And I think MOBAs show that, or the most famous FPS at the moment CS:GO, the game mode played in competitive is an objective based gamemode, is not just kill eachother.

What I think For Honor needs for it to have a healthy competitive community is, around 4-6 gamemodes, no more, that would split too much the community, and it needs one main gamemode, one really good gamemode that has to attract most of the playerbase.

Dominion seems like a good choice for that gamemode, but we'll see.

[SerWarhammer]

That is actually not true, 1v1 will end up on beeing repetitive, it is a good way to train yourself, but it is not a main game mode for this game. I wouldn't play 1v1 that much, because only mechanical skill works there. I rather play the Dominion that they show, you need to stratagize, you have to be good in 1v1, 1v2 and sometimes 1v3, you need to know when to kill minions or capture points, it has a depth in strategy that 1v1 doesn't have, making it more fun to play and to watch.

For a competitive scene(which the game seems to aim to have one) Dominion suits far better, no one wants to see tournaments of people just doing 1v1, people want to see teams playing coordinatly, etc.

And you can argue that there is actually tournaments of 1v1 videogames, like Street Fighter or Tekken, well that is true, but those games have such a deep combat mechanic that allows for 1v1 to be fun to watch, well, fun enough, is not like Fighting Games Scene is close to MOBA or FPS scene.

At the end, The Art of Battle mechanics, are great, but not deep enough for just 1v1 beeing the main gamemode, at least I dont see it.

People will rather play an objective gamemode where they will be able to win based on decision making and not only in mechanical skill. And I think MOBAs show that, or the most famous FPS at the moment CS:GO, the game mode played in competitive is an objective based gamemode, is not just kill eachother.

What I think For Honor needs for it to have a healthy competitive community is, around 4-6 gamemodes, no more, that would split too much the community, and it needs one main gamemode, one really good gamemode that has to attract most of the playerbase.

Dominion seems like a good choice for that gamemode, but we'll see.

we are saying the same thing !!!!! but I am convinced that if the mode 1 vs 1 will be fixed, after the period of the "new game" everyone should play only that, being frustrated by the incompetence of the various teams met previously. a 1 vs 1 mode would kill the other modes.
Tekken has a deep gameplay? XD one on one side and the other on the other, is a gameplay deeper than two fighters that revolve around one another by changing the position of the guard and attack? I'd rather see a good sword-fight between two warriors, as one of E3 between devs, that two figures printed on the screen going left and right.
I am speaking of SPECIAL tournaments organized by UBISOFT to REWARD the more experienced players. because let's face it who would not be awarded as a single winner in a ****ing WORLD tournament?



i forgot: you are one of those who kill the multiplayer game ..... and I'll explain why: only one mode that attracts them all ??