This is another 3rd person scar on the franchise, you are trying to make your own game in a world reknown franchise STOP!!!!
Ghost recon has fell from the top because you want to be innovative but what i see is a company with all the right parts and noone to put it together throw away 3rd person on ghost recon add it to farcry, take the cover system from farcry and turn ghost recon back into the 1st person badass game it use to be before creativity became the rule, we play shooter games we like to fight each other we like all the old game modes from all the past ghost recons, preceeding future soldier and phantoms. Ghost recon was on the fore front of military simulation gaming hell even americas army came to you to produce anddevelope the game now what the whole gaming community thinks ghost recon sucks, because its stupid 3rd person cam really, bring the ghost recon back we know and love give us back our custom matches our big maps we love co op but we love all the pvp game modes more. Future soldier could have been awesome if it was fps and had all the game modes and dlc
Seriously look at how many played the beta for future soldier look at how many bought it then look at how many played it. STOP!!!! you want the game of the year use what you have in ubisoft better from what ive seen on wildlands keep the maps ditch 3rd person it works for splinter cell and would be useful in farcry but not a military sim yes i said military sim thats what ghost recon was dont believe me look at ARMA look at the first 2 ghost recons, there hasnt been any night vision maps since the first 2, damn guys whats up with that. I didnt see any pvp and thats scary considering rainbow 6 has 2 pvp modes and its 5v5 Really people wtf. Ghost needs to be at least 10v10 ATLEAST, another thing if you delete another post i make telling the truth about your games like you did earlier this week i promise you ill never buy a game from you again you took it down because in the 48 hours it was up it got 500 responses the most you have one this game, but if you guys will not listen then keep killing the game and keep throwing dirt on a dead man. Ghost recon isnt fun anymore because your taking the fun out, and just because you suck at fps and military simulation games doesnt give you the right to destroy our game or the franchise or tom clancy
I think what a lot of players need to realize is that Ubisoft owns Ghost Recon... Whatever they do with it is what the game becomes. In my mind, game mechanics don't define a franchise name. Just look at how many different Star Wars games exist out there. There are RTS games, FPS games, TPS games, racing games, etc... Obviously a lot of players feel really strongly on this issue, as it's been a popular subject on the forums here.
Keep in mind, this game, unlike GRFS, uses a hybrid first/third person system. When you're running arond traversing the world on foot or in vehicles you have a third person view. When you actually aim down sights you get a first person view. If you'd like to experience how this works, you can download and try Ghost Recon Phantoms for free. It's basically the same camera system. I personally think it brings the best of both worlds, the expansive open view of third person when moving around, and the precision accuracy of first person aiming.
What makes a franchise is the core premise. In this game, we're playing as a Ghost squad with a specific mission to disrupt the corrupt government and cartels of Bolivia. Seems perfect for a Ghost Recon game.
Also, I'd just like to point out that the biggest military simulation game you mentioned, ArmA, has both first and third person modes available. Third person is superior for a military SIMULATION as it lets you see your character position much better. It's incredibly important for positioning and leaning your character correctly IMO. A simulation game wouldn't be a simulation game if I couldn't switch between first and third person IMO. In fact, I'm pretty sure most simulation games I've played have this option, from flying sims to racing sims.
The best option the developers could implement for cooperative play would be to let players choose first person, third person, or the existing hybrid system. However, if adversarial multiplayer modes are implemented, the host/session server will need the ability to lock players into one particular type of view, otherwise first person players will be at a significant disadvantage to third person / hybrid view players who will be able to see them coming from around corners and such.
Thanks for the feedback!
P.S. As this is an open world game, it has a day/night cycle. So if you want to do a mission at night, you'll have that option. Just look at the trailer, they do the stealth option at night for obvious reasons.
Play the game, this isnt new its old and didnt work, and considering the fact ive paid for and spent thousands of hours of my life playing the ghost recon series i think my input is just as good as the few 8 that went to meet the game devs if you want to know how people feel about ghost recon go to the backwards compatible game list and see what everyone has said about ghost recon. We can all admit the game has went to hell even before graw, and why sell a franchise built of milsim, if your going to turn it into a arcade child friendly ewoks unicorns and rainbows game you obviously got the free online ghost recon, and never played ghost recon 1 and 2. Then you would understand that when those games came out everyone loved those games the way they were, their wasnt as many people online back then by the time 360 came out they changed ghost recon to graw alot of players left alot of new players came then cod came out 2 yrs later blew ghost out the water you know why because it wasnt 3rd person, ghost recon took a 5 to 7 year break and came out with that crappy future soldier game and still havent made thir money back on it, But now wildlands is goin to be better rotflmmfao, icall bull s... that game is nothing but a hyped up piece of crap like future soldier sorry but thats the truth, they can salvage the game by making pvp 1st person only
All I can say if you don't like the game...don't buy it.
Originally Posted by Cortexian0 Go to original post
Way to nice on the guy....LOL
I don't disagree that Ubisoft has pretty much run Ghost Recon into the ground but the issues brought up here like the third person camera aren't good ones. In addition, adversarial PvP to my knowledge hasn't been shown so nobody can say anything regarding that...yet. The claim that there haven't been night maps in GR since the first two games is erroneous as well; GR2, SS, GRAW, and GRAW2 (at least on consoles) all had night maps or at least night time variations of maps. I don't remember if FS had night maps or not though since I hated FS and I didn't play it enough to remember.
I don't trust Ubisoft at all...but being realistic and fair there just isn't enough shown yet one way or the other to fully condemn this title. That said I haven't seen enough yet to convince me that they haven't screwed it up either. Rainbow Six Siege on the other hand...that is a disaster.
Quoted for truth.Originally Posted by DanHibikiFanXM Go to original post
Future Soldier had night maps, but they came in a DLC...
Edit: I just merged a couple of your threads together defiled669cfh, please keep similar feedback inside of one thread. Creating multiple threads won't get any more attention and may have consequences for spamming if you continue.
Cheers,
Cortex
First off no night maps using nvgs sorry play the game even dlc didnt have night maps. And second play the games. The premier showed the exact same 3rd person over the sboulder came pay attention. That rui.ed online game play because the camera would not lock behind corners so chessy people used it with the infamous headshot glitch on a regular basist. Then the covering system was so messed up players were taking advantage of that glitch and became indestructible, such as the guy taged as hec7ic. Everytime ghost comes out it loses people on the multiplayer went from 16 to 12, now it looks like 4. And for my crass friend, how much is ubisoft paying you to be a mediator because you suck. Ive followed this game from its birth, ive seen it in its glory and its downfall. I want ghost recon to be number 1, I want the guys playing arma and the other sim games to see where it all began. Battlefield nor call of dooky held a candle to the first ghost recon games. And if ghost would have stayed with what they were doi.g call of dooky would never see the number one spot. Oh and one more thing my references is to online pvp play if ghost wants to do 3rd person on campaign then good buy onli.e pvp has to be 1st person if they want to make their money back., they did a poll about first person ghost and 3rd. First person killed 3rd. So why ghost recon devs would you make a poll and see the results and not say hey we better make this first person. I love this franchise no matter what but I dont like seei.g it drown in bull s... ideas, bri.g the game play back to its multiplayer roots. And if you haven't played the first 2 ghost recons then please try it then imagine better graphics and more people. Dude they dont have to do anything but remake the first 2 and it will kill whats in the market today so please go play your battlefield or call of dooky. Those games made the path they are on. But bri.g ghost recon back to its milsim roots. Dont let battlefield incorporate a milsim version of that game, and if arma hits consoles its a wrap for those games. Battlefield tried to be innovative hardline is the worst battlefield ever made. Dont believe me look at the sells. Look how many people is online playing. People are bored with this military arcade games the want realistic bullett trajectory they want real guns real explosions and real combat feel. Not another look over the shoulder cam pansy *** game. Ghost recon was never the game people laughed at it was for the hardcore. See I know where it came from rogue spear rainbow six ghost recon all military sims. Stop making it a joke