Junior Member
This is just my opinions, but I think ubisoft should have had spartans rather than samurais, or rather add the spartans to the game. I think that they are such lethal and vicious warriors that it would make the game more fun, interesting and intense since their style of combat is so different. Like I feel like only three classes to choose from is not enough. I think it would be best to have knight, samurai, viking and spartan.
thoughts?
Member
Senior Member
Not sure if serious...Originally Posted by Ianoneshot Go to original post
Senior Member
in this fictional game. Because in the timeline of the game the greek people didn't ever exist. I'm just saying which faction would he belong to? Surely not the knights because knights didn't originate from Greeks, they originated from the Romans. Which is why romans makes sense in this game.Originally Posted by Tundra 793 Go to original post
Senior Member
For Honor's timeline is entirely fictional. Literally anything can be written into the lore.Originally Posted by Ianoneshot Go to original post
Spartans could easily be written into the Knights lore, or at least some close approximation of them.
We aren't restricted by any real world historicity when thinking up new heroes and factions.
Member
In fact, this world is not a totally different world. It is, like the witcher or fallout, it's a ucronia, meaning, our world, but a cataclysmic even changed the future. The devs confirmed it in a dev stream last month. They even said that the place we are in is in western Europe. The first change prior to the cataclysm in for honor is the victory of the Roman empire against the germanic, but they were likely just a contry at that time.
That means that everything that happened before the 5 century did not change with what happened in our world. So the Egyptian and the Greek got excited, killed by the Roman, like in our world.
