About the minimum requirements, what's going on ??
First of all, here is an article from the reliable game-debate.com those guys know what they re talking about better than me
Quote:
Originally Posted by game-debate.com
What's that I hear? Is that a roar of laughter? A gasp of shock? Yep, these are some pretty hefty system requirements, the bare minimum system requirements for Trials Fusion are probably enough to get a fair few gaming PCs running for their life.
First and foremost those GPU requirements. The GeForce GTX 460 and Radeon HD 5850 easily rank up there as one of the highest minimum system requirements we've ever had, hitting 8 out of 10 on the Game-Debate GPU Hardware Scale. To top it off you're going to be wanting a dual core i3-550 processor or a quad-core Athlon II X4 620 to supposedly get the game running at minmum. Still, at least the 3GB RAM requirement isn't too bad?
Moving on to the recommended requirements for Trials Fusion and it's the same tale again, this time asking for a whopping GeForce GTX 560 Ti or a Radeon HD 7850, and you'd best hope you're sporting a quad-core processor!
These requirements seem suspiciously high to us, particularly for a 2D-plane physics racing game. Developer RedLynx and the Trials series has a history of aiming for, and hitting, a solid 60 FPS. Trials HD managed a solid 60 FPS on 360, ditto with Trials Evolution. These Trials Fusion requirements may be artificially high to guarantee a smooth experience if you're hitting these brackets, but they're still pretty beastly.
Remember, you can always check out how well your PC can run the Trials Fusion System Requirements here, where you can check benchmarking and performance from other users.
Were you expecting the system requirements for Trials Fusion to be anywhere near this high?
Let us know!
BTW, those infos were released like a week too late compared to the 19,99$ preorder kick-off on Ubisoft Website.
It's ethically questionnable, especially now that we know how weirdly high they are.
My laptop has the following specs :
Model : HP Envy TS 15 Notebook
CPU : Intel Core I-7 4700MQ
GPU : Geforce GT740M
Integrated Graphic Card : Intel HD Graphics 4600
Ram : 16 GB of Ram
It can run with 60fps sec or more titles like Dark Souls, Tomb Raider , Bioshock, Lord of Shadows, Far Cry 3, SF4 etc....
It was bought 3 months ago for almost 1000$, with the perspective of being confortable when Fusion will come out.
Yes, Fusion, a game that is announced on an 8 years old Xbox 360, 8 years old !!!
But apparently I would fail the minimum requirements ?
To quote the article one more time :
Quote:
First and foremost those GPU requirements. The GeForce GTX 460 and Radeon HD 5850 easily rank up there as one of the highest minimum system requirements we've ever had, hitting 8 out of 10 on the Game-Debate GPU Hardware Scale
Titanfall mimum grahic card requirements on game-debate ranks 6/10, and Fusion would be 8/10 ????
Is it normal that a laptop can run Titanfall (an iconic next-gen AAA game) with no problem and not have a chance at Fusion ?
Will I be doomed to play the likes of Dark Souls 2 high setting, Tomb Raider high settings, Crysis 3, Titanfall etc... on my laptop and just feel like a homeless person who found a virtual boy in a dumpster when it comes to Trials Fusion ?
Waiting for an answer that will explain that non-sense...
I don't want to believe that this 1000$ + 19,99$ investment was all for nothing due to some never-seen before BS lazy optimization.
Crossing my fingers that those specs are only for the first beta build and that some optimization is coming up to put those figures to a more decent scale.
Otherwise, it makes no sense
Thanks to whoever will look into that matter