PDA

View Full Version : Opinions on Future aircraft



AndrewOC
05-12-2004, 12:37 PM
OK, this isnt a poll because it is too limiting.
So, place all comments here. Will it make a difference to a new il2? Anyway, i personaly would love to see a Lancaster bomber, a HurriBomber and for the Luftwaffe, maybe a Fuer...somthing. This was a new plane that was no the drawing boards when the war ended. It used a massive great propeller in the middle part of the fusalage. There was no engine. Instead, there was a jet pack on each end of a prop blade. I saw this on the History channel. Only problem was, the pilot was sitting in a normal seat, facing the front of the plane The pane took of and landed verticaly! Anyway, enough of what i want, what about all of you want!
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

AndrewOC
05-12-2004, 12:37 PM
OK, this isnt a poll because it is too limiting.
So, place all comments here. Will it make a difference to a new il2? Anyway, i personaly would love to see a Lancaster bomber, a HurriBomber and for the Luftwaffe, maybe a Fuer...somthing. This was a new plane that was no the drawing boards when the war ended. It used a massive great propeller in the middle part of the fusalage. There was no engine. Instead, there was a jet pack on each end of a prop blade. I saw this on the History channel. Only problem was, the pilot was sitting in a normal seat, facing the front of the plane The pane took of and landed verticaly! Anyway, enough of what i want, what about all of you want!
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Brain32
05-12-2004, 12:56 PM
Just give me the TEMPEST!!!
I usually fly with German planes (FW190), but Tempest is something special. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif

ElektroFredrik
05-12-2004, 01:07 PM
You mean this? The Focke-Wulf Triebflugel

http://www.luft46.com/ghart/ghtrb-3.jpg

I doubt the FB engine could handle this and even
if it could, Oleg would be stalked for the rest
of his life by hundreds of agry people for
implementing a fantasy-luft46-what-in-one-in-a-
million-über-Star-Wars-fantasy-n00b-plane
that didn't even fly.

For me, I'd rather have this baby.

http://www.luft46.com/jhart/jha6-2.jpg

V-2 with auxilliary ramjet to extend range. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
Just too bad it's unarmed, was planned for high
speed recon.

http://www.scarysquirrel.org/ksk/tuftycard3.jpg
"What I study is sex and squirrels" - Jane Waterman, Ph.D.
Flying online as Furvert_Elektro

VW-IceFire
05-12-2004, 01:30 PM
Another one for the Tempest and the Typhoon!

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

AndrewOC
05-12-2004, 01:33 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ElektroFredrik:
You mean this? The Focke-Wulf Triebflugel

http://www.luft46.com/ghart/ghtrb-3.jpg

Flying online as Furvert_Elektro<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Ohhh! Yeah. I know that was a bit daft! AND, i know it never engaged with another plane.
What about the AmerikaBomber, the Gotha229, the flyable suicide V2, Only joking! Dont panic. How was the picture done? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/353.gif

AndrewOC
05-12-2004, 01:37 PM
Oh, and the 2 rotar helecopter, and the funny looking Adrado Arrow. Now that DID fly!!!!!!! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/351.gif

LEXX_Luthor
05-12-2004, 01:48 PM
ElektroFredrik:: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
http://www.luft46.com/jhart/jha6-2.jpg

V-2 with auxilliary ramjet to extend range.
Just too bad it's unarmed, was planned for high
speed recon.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>LOL that thing looks Awsum.

I am thinking of (unarmed) BI~1 Extreme "what if" campaign where you are recce pilot over frontline if Soviets can't otherwise send recce planes over sensitive German positions--ie...positions well defended by LW). Of course Me~163 would be an answer for that. 60 BI~1 were made so it was not a mere experimental plane, but they were all burned down in a factory fire. For theoretical justification I am thinking maybe Pe~2 or IL~4 would tow BI~1 near frontline and releace it.

Yes BI~1 and Me~163 should only have 2 minutes of fuel not 8 minutes like they do now. No problem just start with 25% fuel.

__________________
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/10.gif Flyable Swedish "Gladiator" listed as J8A ...in Aces Expansion Pack


"You will still have FB , you will lose nothing" ~WUAF_Badsight
"I had actually pre ordered CFS3 and I couldnt wait..." ~Bearcat99
"Gladiator and Falco, elegant weapons of a more civilized age" ~ElAurens
:
"Damn.....Where you did read about Spitfire made from a wood?
Close this book forever and don't open anymore!" ~Oleg_Maddox http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-surprised.gif

Snuffy_Hadden
05-12-2004, 04:03 PM
I'm thinking More Heavy Bombers. We got an AI B-17, Hows about some AI allied and Axis heavies for AI ... then we can work out the minor details of interiors for player use.

p1ngu666
05-12-2004, 05:43 PM
miles m52 if we getting all 46y http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/mockface.gif

http://www.pingu666.modded.me.uk/mysig3.jpg
&lt;123_GWood_JG123&gt; NO SPAM!

popse
05-13-2004, 12:41 PM
Well we have almost every major German and Soviet Aircraft from the period.
But we missing alot of the RAF ,so maybe before we start making strange plan that never flow we should add this:
http://hsfeatures.com/images/typhoonbl_1.jpg
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

Ill also miss the Fokker XXI but its comming!!!

Waiting for the patch....
http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/finland/finnish-soldiers.jpg

faustnik
05-13-2004, 01:35 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by VW-IceFire:
Another one for the Tempest and the Typhoon!

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I'm with IceFire on this one. With all the development shots of the Tempest with the great textures, I really look forward to flying/fighting it.

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/mdegnan/_images/FaustSig
www.7Jg77.com (http://www.7jg77.com)
CWoS FB forum. More Cheese, Less Whine. (http://www.acompletewasteofspace.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=25)

hotspace
05-13-2004, 01:39 PM
Spit XIV or the Mossie http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Hot Space

http://img11.photobucket.com/albums/v33/Hot_Space/222_1081552716_hs1sig.jpg

Nervous? Yes! First time? No, I've been nervous lots of times!!!

darkhorizon11
05-13-2004, 11:31 PM
Yeah the Triebflugel is a crazy looking thing but unrealistic. I don't think it ever got past wind tunnels and even if in some crazy evil alt. future were Germany turns the tide and all these new aircraft are implmented in combat that design would probably be extremely unstable.

The concept is similiar to the V-22 Osprey in that the entire wing surfaces will pitch against the relative wind. The is an incredible amount of stress involved and materials like titanium were extremely rare at the time. The Germans did have an Osprey-like design that never made it past the drawing board. Even if they did develop it they would have run into the same problems Bell did with the structural integrity of their Osprey. Not to mention that it has three engines and that any damage taken to the wings or engine would be catastrophic the same way a loss of a rotor blade would be to a helicopter. So bad in fact that the vibration would probably kill the pilot before he could eject. Thats why the USAF never pursued it after the war the only plane close to it was the Ryan XP-15?? (I think) which is still a world apart.

Sorry thats so long but I had to be realistic about that one.

Personally I'd like to see some of the surface to air Wesserfalls, Fuerelillies, Hagelkorns, V2s, and X4s before anymore wonderbirds http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Porsimo
05-13-2004, 11:56 PM
There are many planes, like Tempest / Typhoon and Lancaster, which would be nice to have but there's only one plane I've REALLY wanted since I heard they're going to release an "addon" for the original IL-2 (that makes it a quite a long wait http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif ):

FOKKER D.XXI

- Regards
Porsimo
---------------------------
http://personal.inet.fi/koti/gudmund/fb/sigs/normandy1[1].jpg

Prof.Wizard
05-14-2004, 02:12 AM
I want to see more Spitfires. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/51.gif
Damn, where are the MK IX (the promised) and the awesome MK XIV?
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-mad.gif

See these links to be persuaded:
http://www.odyssey.dircon.co.uk/Spitfire9v190.htm
http://www.odyssey.dircon.co.uk/Spitfire14v109.htm
http://www.odyssey.dircon.co.uk/Spitfire14v190.htm

-----------------------------
http://www.mihailidis.com/images/WizardSig.gif
Me-163's HWK 109-509 Rocket Engine
http://www.mihailidis.com/images/HWK109509.jpg

[This message was edited by Prof.Wizard on Fri May 14 2004 at 01:32 AM.]

VW-IceFire
05-14-2004, 06:45 AM
Several pieces of good news.

First is that Fievel who was building the Spitfire XIV is still commited to the project and he plans to have it done by the end of this month (or he will ask for help from the community to push it the last bit of the way).

Second is that Harti has already submitted the Hawker Typhoon Mark IB Late to Oleg and its apparently going to appear in the patch as an AI fighter. The cockpit is going to be made from the Tempest cockpit once that pit is done (there are few differences).

Alex Voicu who is making the Tempest V reported a few weeks ago that progress was slow but moving along and that the cockpit would be finished rapidly after the model itself was completed.

There are also possibilities for Lancaster and Mosquitos appearing...the Mosquito VI possibly flyable but doubtful that the Lanc will be (same problem as usual, too many stations to model). There is of course also the Beaufighter in progress and that one I don't know where it will be but its definately going to be in Pacific Fighters apparently....so we are fairly certain of having that.

The other questionmarks are the Spitfire VIII and the Seafire of which both could appear in Pacific Fighters rather readily (although so could the Spitfire XIV as well which saw service in the last months of the Pacific war against Japanese in the fighter recon role).

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

Jippo01
05-14-2004, 07:33 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Snuffy_Hadden:
I'm thinking More Heavy Bombers. We got an AI B-17, Hows about some AI allied and Axis heavies for AI ... then we can work out the minor details of interiors for player use.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Minor details? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif


-jippo

LeLv28 - Fighting for independency since 2002
http://www.lelv28.com

Falkster's Ju-88 fan site:
www.ju88.de.tf (http://www.ju88.de.tf)

karaya9
05-14-2004, 08:04 AM
Personally, I would like to see FB developed into a kind of interactive WW2 sim. By that I mean the option of choosing from different theaters as part of a whole campaign from 39-45.
For example, as a german Fighter pilot, you start in September 39 in Poland, go on to France and the Battle of Britain, the Balkans, then to the Eastern Front. In 1942 you may even be transferred to North Africa. Upon returning to the East, in the Summer of 1944 another Transfer to the Channel Coast and then all the way back to Berlin in 1945.
Well, something like that would be the definitive FB, at least for me.

Anyone around who thinks much the same way?
Let the Developers know, ok? Maybe, sooner or later, they might jump on a idea like this.

brother23
05-14-2004, 08:06 AM
How about modeling/texturing-jobs for the game.
It´s hard to find information about recruiting
outside.

I would like to do some work for the game.
I think it´s one of best sim games ever made
and it is one of the last I like to play.
Other companies make to much compromises for
the great mass of players that lacks in the
end in quality and complexity.

I do both, high poly cinematics and low poly
modeling/texturing and that fast and effective.

If there is aircraft creation to do, give it
a try.

www.tinyuniverses.com (http://www.tinyuniverses.com)

stefan@tinyuniverses.com

Roast
05-14-2004, 09:05 AM
Let them start with adding more aircraft to FB that were also seen in the East under the Lend-Lease program and in shuttle missions to/from Soviet-held territory; some of these are already worked on like the A-20 Havoc, B-25 [not just AI please http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-happy.gif ]. Then aircraft that were often seen over German-held territory, mostly bombers [Lancaster, B-24 etc.] but also late Spitties [in the new patch, I hear]. On the Axis side, please give us bomber interceptors like the Bf110G-4 and He 219 'UHU' nightfighters, Ju-88 heavy fighters and the Me 410. If we really have to get more fighters, then why not add the up=armoured Fw 190's of the Sturmstaffels for attacking heavy bomber formations.

Secondly, please let some lesser known aircraft in that were in use with the smaller axis countries, like the Avia B-534 and such.

Personally, I don't need planes like the Horten [how interesting the idea may be]. I rather see planes that actually flew in action [not just 1 prototype or so]. FB already has some very interesting planes now, like Romanian fighters and [hopefully soon more] Italian fighters. Encountering these on/offline once in a while makes it a much more interesting than always the same 109's vs Mustang/Spitfire combinations.

Just my 2 Eurocents http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

Roast

AndrewOC
05-14-2004, 12:39 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by karaya9:
Personally, I would like to see FB developed into a kind of interactive WW2 sim. By that I mean the option of choosing from different theaters as part of a whole campaign from 39-45.
For example, as a german Fighter pilot, you start in September 39 in Poland, go on to France and the Battle of Britain, the Balkans, then to the Eastern Front. In 1942 you may even be transferred to North Africa. Upon returning to the East, in the Summer of 1944 another Transfer to the Channel Coast and then all the way back to Berlin in 1945.
Well, something like that would be the definitive FB, at least for me.

Anyone around who thinks much the same way?
Let the Developers know, ok? Maybe, sooner or later, they might jump on a idea like this.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah gotta agree there!

Jippo01
05-14-2004, 01:15 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by brother23:
If there is aircraft creation to do, give it
a try.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Introduce yourself in here:

http://www.netwings.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=DCForumID43&conf=DCConfID1

Read the sticky posts on top and ask what you can do for us. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif


-jippo

LeLv28 - Fighting for independency since 2002
http://www.lelv28.com

Falkster's Ju-88 fan site:
www.ju88.de.tf (http://www.ju88.de.tf)

VW-IceFire
05-14-2004, 01:50 PM
If you guys want the Me 410 flyable there is a cockpit modeler who is working desperately to create an accurate cockpit. But he has few resources so far...

Try and help him out.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

Prof.Wizard
05-14-2004, 09:20 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by VW-IceFire:
If you guys want the Me 410 flyable there is a cockpit modeler who is working desperately to create an accurate cockpit.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
OMG the Me410... that's a dream plane for me.
Who is he? Boy we need to help this guy cause the Me410 would be an awesome two-engined bird to fly. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

-----------------------------
http://www.mihailidis.com/images/WizardSig.gif
Me-163's HWK 109-509 Rocket Engine
http://www.mihailidis.com/images/HWK109509.jpg

LEXX_Luthor
05-14-2004, 09:29 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Who is he?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>meako

410 modder thread ---&gt; http://www.netwings.org/dcforum/DCForumID43/874.html

XyZspineZyX
05-15-2004, 03:55 AM
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

Once again;
Tempest and Typhoon!

Yes the BEST!

Sensei.

http://users.skynet.be/sb314718/images/tintinspit.gif

SuomiPilotti
05-15-2004, 07:32 AM
just give me flyable B-25, and I´ll stop whining... for a week! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif

Ki_Rin
05-15-2004, 11:24 AM
Good Lord!..
How about getting the FMs/DMs of the existing types correct first, then make the AIs flyable,
THEN new types....
My P47 D22 is NEVER going to get it's paddle prop at this rate

Irish_JG26
05-15-2004, 12:54 PM
S~

1st: A flyable B17
2nd: A flyable PE2
3rd: The FW Ta183 (the swept wing jet fighter that looked like the Bell X5... Oh wait it was the Bell X5 since the Allies took it home with them)
4th: The ability to fly the FW190A8 & A9 clean without the bomb racks and to use the 2-cannon configuration without the bomb racks.

Irish

Vanderstok
05-15-2004, 03:58 PM
I would like to see more 2 engined bomber/attack aircraft like the Mosquito and Beaufighter. I also have a weakness for the HE-100. I believe someone was making it, but I'm not sure what happened. I guess it will be impossible to get good pictures of the cockpit! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

WUAF_Badsight
05-15-2004, 04:13 PM
http://img7.photobucket.com/albums/v18/Badsight/Heinkel_He-100.jpg

Vanderstok
05-15-2004, 04:19 PM
Wow! That's the one! Gotta love that plane and the story behind it. I think it could have evolved into a great fighter if it had the chance.

WUAF_Badsight
05-15-2004, 04:19 PM
670 km/h in 1939

p1ngu666
05-15-2004, 04:47 PM
it had no radiator didnt it?
well the wings where i think, get hit in wings and lose fluid :\
that isnt modeled in fb tho so itll be great

http://www.pingu666.modded.me.uk/mysig3.jpg
&lt;123_GWood_JG123&gt; NO SPAM!

Vanderstok
05-15-2004, 04:53 PM
Production models featured a retractable radiator I believe, the wing/condense radiator type was abandoned.
Would be nice to do a "defence the Heinkel factories" mission someday http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Ki_Rin
05-15-2004, 06:41 PM
He100/112 was a better type than Bf109, even with a higher wingloading, but politics and that it cost more than 109 doomed it....can't wait to try it here!

Ki_Rin
05-15-2004, 06:48 PM
A Fw 187 would be nice, too...mind you, few were built, again, in deference to the Me110, and again, ole Willy Messershmitt pulled the strings to get an inferior type into production (inferior, relativly speaking, hehe)
The Fw 187 was a twin single seat relegated to Fw factory defense
But the ultimate sweet LW ride would have to be the He219 Uhu...first with UV lighted instruments, first production type with ejection seat (pneumatic, I believe) over 400 kph cruise, moblie, versitile, stretchable, durable, ...a true "wunder" plane

p1ngu666
05-15-2004, 07:22 PM
ive wondered why more planes didnt have retractable radiator, maybe it was a weight thing
plus at high speeds it could jam easily i suspect

http://www.pingu666.modded.me.uk/mysig3.jpg
&lt;123_GWood_JG123&gt; NO SPAM!

VW-IceFire
05-17-2004, 06:44 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Ki_Rin:
Good Lord!..
How about getting the FMs/DMs of the existing types correct first, then make the AIs flyable,
THEN new types....
My P47 D22 is NEVER going to get it's paddle prop at this rate<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Those are never going to be "truly" correct so they can release 100 patches of FM/DM "improvements" and you'll still see problems, inconsistencies, and issues that need addressing...or you can move on multiple fronts with fixes to those areas done anyways plus new aircraft as they are completed by the community.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

bloggs1
05-20-2004, 02:56 AM
I'd like to see P51A/A36 Invader (the early P51 dive bomber that is) - this would be an ideal fighter for FB with its excellent perfomance at low altitude - I think only the Tempest had better out of US/UK fighters.

PBNA-Boosher
05-20-2004, 06:32 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>.
Yes BI~1 and Me~163 should only have 2 minutes of fuel not 8 minutes like they do now. No problem just start with 25% fuel.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Funny thing? I've heard Luthier say it could fly with full power for 8 minutes. "Its fuel load lasts 8 minutes." Luthier stated.

Capt.England
05-20-2004, 01:27 PM
Slightly OT here!

1. Maybe when a new 3D engine is made, 1C whould be kind to release the source code to the fans so that one day some bright spark releases a plane maker/ map maker program http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-happy.gif
2. I would love to see a full Luft46 type sim out on the market. Seems to be a lot of interest out there for "what if?" books/films/models and as a cash cow, a attack on the US in 1949 campain by Germany whould be great fun (for both sides). Just think of what planes could be used.
3. Back OT, Plane wise, I would love to see the Gloster Meteor, Supermarine Spiteful, Supermarine Seafang, Westland Whirlwind, Hawker Tempest II, and a driveable tank. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

LeadSpitter_
05-20-2004, 06:51 PM
FLYABLE!! b25 variants, ju88, pe3, and tempest Im a happy camper.

I'd like to see the a20 and mossie also the lockheed ventura britians backbone http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

harryklein66
05-20-2004, 07:21 PM
a flyable beaufighter would be a nice add=great
fight versus Jippo ju88 c6 http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif
and the a20(i love this one http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/53.gif) to offer a better for russian side than tb3
and finaly the H75 to make french il2 user very very very Happy http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

AH_Cutora
05-22-2004, 05:55 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by karaya9:
Personally, I would like to see FB developed into a kind of interactive WW2 sim. By that I mean the option of choosing from different theaters as part of a whole campaign from 39-45.
For example, as a german Fighter pilot, you start in September 39 in Poland, go on to France and the Battle of Britain, ... &lt;cut&gt;.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yeah good idea. I'm another person with this oppinion.

aminx
05-23-2004, 01:40 PM
i wish to fly the following soon:

B24
B17
mosquito

aminx

http://img25.photobucket.com/albums/v76/aminx/113.jpg

JG52_wunsch
05-23-2004, 03:54 PM
hs-129,he-219,me410 and tempest/typhoon would be sweet.the hs-129 mostly fought on the eastern front anyway.cheers.

After it was refeuled i climbed in.With many manipulations the mechcanics started the turbines.I followed their actions with the greatest of interest.The first one started quite easily.the second caught fire.In no time the whole engine was on fire.Luckily as a fighter pilot i was used to getting quickly out of the cockpit.The fire was quickly put out.The second plane caused no trouble - Adolf Galland (first time in a ME262)

WereSnowleopard
05-23-2004, 05:09 PM
5 choices

Hs-129
Hs-123
Me-109F-4/B
Pe-2/3
Fw-189
Bombs: AB23, AB24t, PC500 RC and Hs-293(for if Fw-200 become flyable).


Cheers
Snowloepard

darkhorizon11
05-25-2004, 12:52 AM
"3rd: The FW Ta183 (the swept wing jet fighter that looked like the Bell X5... Oh wait it was the Bell X5 since the Allies took it home with them)"

Thats an awesome jet but it would throw this game all out of wack and everyone would hate it right away. There wouldn't be a server online that would allow it. Its way to uber... anyone who flew it would have such a ridicous advantage to balance it out they'd have to introduce planes like the Sabre. They did add it to the new CFS3 add-on I wonder how it will work out there.

Oh and it was actually the Russians who borrowed the Ta 153 not the Americans, in their design of the MiG 15 (although its arguable because there are some decent differences in design). Your thinking of the Messerschmitt P.1101 which pioneered sweep wing design.

P.1101 (http://www.luft46.com/mess/mep1101.html)

If we need anymore jets its the Ar234 and the Meteor. But even before them theres still plenty of piston powered planes that haven't been modeled. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/35.gif

WOLFMondo
05-25-2004, 12:55 AM
Mossie, A20, Beaufighter, Typhoon and Tempest.

http://bill.nickdafish.com/sig/mondo.jpg
Wolfgaming.net. Where the Gameplay is teamplay (http://www.wolfgaming.net)

Buckaroo12
05-25-2004, 02:30 AM
Personally, I'd like to see some different load-out options added. Specifically to the Go-229, and ME-163. I read somewhere, that there was a Ground Attack version of the Gotha, on the boards and it would be interesting to have that load-out available. For the 163, I think a neat option would be the variant with the verticle cannons or rockets mounted in the wing. They were triggered automatically by a photoelectric cell when the Komet flew directly underneath a bomber. These were developed to compensate for the lack of time Komet pilots had to line up shots with the nose cannon.

As far as airplanes go, I would really like to see a mosquito (since the game is already leaning towards adding RAF types) I also think that there would be room for some of the twin engined Night Interceptors from all sides (mosquito, me110, etc.) I'm not sure if the game engine could handle it, but many of the late war twins had modified nose sections to accomodate radar. This would make Night missions much more enjoyable IMHO.

Some other features that would be nice would be a "Wartime quality" switch in the difficulty menu. This would take into account the drop in quality of wartime production and allow for random system failures. I also think that if we are going to have engine overheating, there should be a way of determining outside air temps and compensating for that(engine overheating faster in the summer sort of thing) I have seen a lot of people griping about the clouds, personally I could care less about them. However, I would like to see airframe icing introduced. In real life if you fly into a cloud without de-icing gear on your plane, it's bye-bye lift and hello rapidly approaching terrain! This would add a little hesitation to just ducking into a cloud when in a bad situation or lurking in a cloud (gathering ice on the wings) waiting for someone to pass you bye.

Wow, I didn't mean to type this much.

KG26_Oranje
05-25-2004, 08:07 AM
HS126 , HS129 ,Wellington , Mossi , PE2/3 , B-25 , A20 , Do17/215/217 , Ju88/188 , Tu2 , C-47 , Ju52 , Do24 , Fokker / VL D-XXI , Hawk 75 , Me210/410 , Bristel blenheim , Beaufighter , He219 Uhu , FW200 , FW189 and Ju86.
All flyable please.

S! I/KG26_Oranje

NN_EnigmuS
05-25-2004, 10:07 AM
Ju88,Pe2,B25,A20/B20,Me410,Tempest,Typhoon,SpitMk14,Fw190D11/12/13,Fw190F8/F9 with panzerblitz,Hs129,I15/152,Mosquito,Hs123,beaufighter

lot of them are in built or already made so let cross fingers

http://www.nnavirex.com/public/enigmus.gif

s.bush
05-25-2004, 12:34 PM
is the B24 beeing developed and is it flyable?will it be for fb or pf ?and when?
s.bush

http://img25.photobucket.com/albums/v76/aminx/cors_land_car.jpg

s.bush
05-25-2004, 12:48 PM
Hey,this is developing into a real mess!!worse than IRAQ.
We all know that a lot of the above wishes are already developed and approved and a lot more underway,so where do we go from here??since the engine of fb is the same as pf why cant we have them all compatible to fit into any of the 2 sims and kill lots of birds with one stone?same goes for maps etc.
for example if oleg would give us just the map of england and the ju88 which is ready for fb we could set up our own BOB's ,the DO17 etc. can come later in patches.
same goes for the MED SIM,just the med basin map
the ju88,a couple of ships and we can get going until further patches or dedicated add ons follow for any of the scenarios.i hope i am able to express my ideas clearly.
s.bush
http://img25.photobucket.com/albums/v76/aminx/cors_land_car.jpg

Nazinette
05-26-2004, 11:17 PM
Colibri http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/784.gif

nazinetter