PDA

View Full Version : PACIFIC FIGHTERS LOOKS AWESOME !!!!!



kamakaze75
07-09-2004, 09:54 PM
From looking at the weekly updates man this game sure is gonna be a vrey intense game .i cant wait to get shot at by aircraft carriers and flying into one to .well just though i share my feelings bout this game .-=OLEG MADDOX=- http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif WE HAIL YOU !!!

kamakaze75
07-09-2004, 09:54 PM
From looking at the weekly updates man this game sure is gonna be a vrey intense game .i cant wait to get shot at by aircraft carriers and flying into one to .well just though i share my feelings bout this game .-=OLEG MADDOX=- http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/11.gif WE HAIL YOU !!!

Yellonet
07-10-2004, 12:03 PM
Yep, it's gonna be the game of the year if you ask me, if they get it out in time http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif Do come in to the PF forum and post something!


- Yellonet

BSS_Vidar
07-11-2004, 10:32 AM
It'll be interesting if Kamakaze strikes actually cause damage to ships in PF. You can fly into ships all day in FB/AEP, and the crew just sounds...
"Sweepers sweepers, man you brooms - Give the ship a clean sweep down fore and aft, Now sweepers".
Oh my head! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/35.gif I just had a terrible flash-back! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

BSS_Vidar

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 03:36 PM
I think the carriers look amazing so does the water textures. but the aircraft models look worse then some of cfs2s, I dont know if its higher poly models in cfs2 or just becuase of the 1024 textures in PF. In cfs2 they seem to have much detail compaired to PF.

http://www.il2sturmovik.com/forgotten_battles/090704/TBF-1C_Avenger2.jpg

vs

http://img32.photobucket.com/albums/v97/acespace/usncfs2.jpg

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

VW-IceFire
07-11-2004, 03:53 PM
Did CFS2 have environment mapping? The FB engine certainly lacks that type of sophistication. Then again, I think some concessions are made for other levels of detail.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 03:58 PM
Enviormental Mapping meaning light reflections on the model? If so yes it does. I mean cfss water looks bad but the land looks fantastic in the mountanious areas and from high alt it looks amazing as well. Also aircraft dont respond as quickly as they do in FB like its flyby wire.

http://img32.photobucket.com/albums/v97/acespace/zerovszero.jpg

and 190a8

http://img32.photobucket.com/albums/v97/acespace/190vs190.jpg

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

[This message was edited by LeadSpitter_ on Sun July 11 2004 at 03:17 PM.]

Hoarmurath
07-11-2004, 05:01 PM
http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/zero_1.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/zero_2.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/zero_3.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/zero_4.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/zero_5.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/sighoar.jpg (http://hoarmurath.free.fr/)

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 05:21 PM
I like jutoscas skin, the cfs2 skins still have more detail in them.

care to show a screen with fps hoar?

also both of mine are same res no aa and af.

PS quit responding to my posts hoarmurath all you do is try to cause flame wars here with all the users. Your getting very annoying. The mods can look at your last 20 threads and see the same

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 05:21 PM
I like jutoscas skin, the cfs2 skins still have more detail in them.

care to show a screen with fps hoar?

also both of mine are same res no aa and af.

PS quit responding to my posts hoarmurath all you do is try to cause flame wars here with all the users. Your getting very annoying. The mods can look at your last 20 threads and see the same

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 05:21 PM
I like jutoscas skin, the cfs2 skins still have more detail in them.

care to show a screen with fps hoar?

also both of mine are same res no aa and af.

PS quit responding to my posts hoarmurath all you do is try to cause flame wars here with all the users. Your getting very annoying. The mods can look at your last 20 threads and see the same

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 05:21 PM
I like jutoscas skin, the cfs2 skins still have more detail in them. But jutos is the best il2fb can get

care to show a screen with fps hoar?

also both of mine are same res no aa and af.

PS quit responding to my posts hoarmurath all you do is try to cause flame wars here with all the users. Your getting very annoying. The mods can look at your last 20 threads and see the same

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 05:21 PM
I like jutoscas skin, the cfs2 skins still have more detail in them. But jutos is the best il2fb can get

care to show a screen with fps hoar?

also both of mine are same res no aa and af.

PS quit responding to my posts hoarmurath all you do is try to cause flame wars here with all the users. Your getting very annoying. The mods can look at your last 20 threads and see the same

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

Hoarmurath
07-11-2004, 05:46 PM
This zero was made at 1600*1200 res, no AA, AF at minimum, it give me about 20 fps, i only have a AMD 2200+ with a 9600pro. Texture quality is at minimum setting.

Next series is with a fw190 from hammerd, still 1600*1200, with texture settings at max, AA*4, AF*16

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/fw190_1a.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/fw190_2a.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/fw190_3a.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/fw190_4a.jpg

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/fw190_5a.jpg

I suggest you stop being paranoid, you're just making a fool of yourself. I posted these screens because i saw there was a difference in the rendering of your screenshots, as if the CFS ones had been made with a higher res.

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/sighoar.jpg (http://hoarmurath.free.fr/)

LeadSpitter_
07-11-2004, 07:15 PM
go post them in screenshots section. Do me a favor hourmurath or, dont post in a thread I post in. And I will do the same if I see you post first. Frankly I cant believe your not banned permantly for your anti us posts and thats why you annoy me.

I Dont need 5 huge unoptimized pics to see the comparison of how much a difference the cfs2 larger textures make. And the external quality of the polys of the cfs2 190 vs the fbs 190 same with payloads and racks.

yes hammerds and jutoscas skins are great and make the model look better then stock il2fb skin, but you can see how much more detailed the cfs2 external models are which makes which im compairing the difference of.

Go annoy gibbage now becuase hes american like you been doing.

http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

Willi_Wombat
07-11-2004, 08:17 PM
relax LS,

Your English just gets worse when you post when you are upset.

http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

WW

VW-IceFire
07-11-2004, 10:13 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by LeadSpitter_:
Enviormental Mapping meaning light reflections on the model? If so yes it does. I mean cfss water looks bad but the land looks fantastic in the mountanious areas and from high alt it looks amazing as well. Also aircraft dont respond as quickly as they do in FB like its flyby wire.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes...light reflections based on the environment around it. It generally adds color and extra shading to the object (in terms of visuals).

Generally its the textures that give that "better looking" feel to them. Toss on a skin done by a community memeber and it looks just the same or better. FB does look better...we haven't regressed...

Never played CFS2 so I can't comment on how things fly there.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

Hoarmurath
07-11-2004, 10:37 PM
The zeros screens are perfectly optimized for playing, i only changed the resolution from my playing settings.
As to not post in these forums, i suggest you return reading the american constitution, you can stop at the first amendment. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/mockface.gif

http://hoarmurath.free.fr/images/sighoar.jpg (http://hoarmurath.free.fr/)

UF-Josse
07-11-2004, 10:49 PM
I never skinned on CFS plane, but i saw bmp files and i think it has advantages when i look on skins made for this game.

Reso is probably higher... just seeing rivits, we can make finer in CFS2... you can draw much details it seem... you can also draw finer weathering, paint ships and other. SO.... 1 point for CFS2

But, with a good skin like those of Jutocsa, Hammerd or others i like.... general impression is for me better in FB....textures make me a better impression.....
So, i try to resume (hard for me in english , sorry) CFS2 better for resolution and possibilities, but, better general look in FB.

WUAF_Co_Hero
07-11-2004, 11:33 PM
To me, the biggeset difference between IL2 and CSF2 plane models, is the "crispness" I guess you could say. The FB models ARE infact more deatailed, and definitely higher poly. count, but they lack the crisp realistic effect of the csf2 a/c. They are somewhat "cartoonish" in comparison. I think it's just a style preference really, but the pilots, wheels, guns, and canopies are much better in FB. Also, lighting is more complex in FB from what I've seen.

Build a man a fire, keep him warm for a day...

Set a man on fire, keep him warm for the rest of his life.

LLv34_Flanker
07-12-2004, 05:26 AM
S!

Without taking part in the discussion of the plane details or so, but there's a really tempting option in Pacific Fighters! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif Figure this: Japanese career as Kamikaze pilot...

---------------------------

Flanker
1.Lentue p√¬§√¬§llikk√¬∂ / TO
Lentolaivue 34

"Let Chaos entvine on defenseless soil!"
~Dimmu Borgir~

609IAP_Recon
07-12-2004, 05:38 AM
perhaps that detail is bad news for playability.

some tradeoff made for more complex FM, DM, (can we say cfs2 collision damage....) could be here.

Salute!

S!
7thFS_Recon, CO
7th Fighter Squadron
"Screamin' Demons" (http://7thfs.forgottenskies.com)


http://www.forgottenskies.com/ScreaminDemons.gif
Forgotten Skies (http://www.forgottenskies.com)

LeadSpitter_
07-12-2004, 05:08 PM
oh great willi wombat is back houramuths other name ubi mods cant ban because of his spoofed ip.

Mods how about a lock of this thredd which is out of hand

-----------------------

7thFS_Recon I dont really see how collisions are better one plane usually seems to survive 80% of the time in fb, complex fms either we dot have accurate dive speeds and other basics of flight neither game offer like xplane does

the cfs2 bubbles were horable as well but could be reduced with hexedit. All the 1% aircraft did that.

Both are good games but fb/aep is best now for its time. But the trade off is small square maps vs full world terrain which looks worse then the full world terrain at higher altitude. Another thing i miss is each runway having its own unique look and different hangers

I dunno you can have a fleet of ships 100-500 aircraft in cfs2 all AAA guns going off and get over 200fps.

for fb 35 ac and flak going off will drop you from 55-75fps to low 20s. I think its a problem with the way the AAA has a smoke trail line from the flak gun straight up following the shell. in cfs2 we can have 1000s of flak bursts with no loss of fps. I think an option to turn off the 7000m+ smoke line from each shell to the gun itself would increase fps so much.



http://img14.photobucket.com/albums/v43/leadspitter/LSIG1.gif

[This message was edited by LeadSpitter_ on Mon July 12 2004 at 04:17 PM.]

[This message was edited by LeadSpitter_ on Mon July 12 2004 at 04:22 PM.]

starfighter1
07-13-2004, 03:24 AM
hi,
please notice: this game engine is not a fully DirectX 9.0b/(next 9.0c)..with all the new features
example todays: Far Cry .. some more new )

I'm looking forward to the new game engine of BoB and more better programming of real seaside and even the UK island...

Anyway: it's a pc-combatsim and the feature programming of the clouds is one of the best at the background of this gameengine... (first programmed in 2001/02 at Il-2)

dadada1
07-14-2004, 06:55 AM
CFS 2 also looks way better than CFS 3, what the hell happened at Microsoft, did they all watch a meteor storm together and went blind?

Cajun76
07-14-2004, 08:08 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by LLv34_Flanker:
S!

Without taking part in the discussion of the plane details or so, but there's a really tempting option in Pacific Fighters! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif Figure this: Japanese career as Kamikaze pilot...

---------------------------

Flanker
1.Lentue p√¬§√¬§llikk√¬∂ / TO
Lentolaivue 34

"Let Chaos entvine on defenseless soil!"
~Dimmu Borgir~<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Finally, a campaign I can finish succesfully..... http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

Good hunting,
Cajun76

http://img12.photobucket.com/albums/v30/Cajun76/p47nh.jpg
What if there were no hypothetical questions?

MrOblongo
07-14-2004, 07:16 PM
Theres something i still miss in Pacific Fighters.....MORE CLOUDS!