PDA

View Full Version : [Reveal] SHINJE WARRIOR



DraGznaroK
05-07-2013, 01:39 AM
Special revelation for Momcards' 1 Year , as you can see in the interview developers, this card presents an interesting creature in its ability.
I do not know about you, but I'm looking forward to the other cards. We will wait for May 28 to enjoy :)

http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/1024/shinjewarrioreng.jpg

OnoreSadame
05-07-2013, 02:08 AM
I guess i'm gonna need 4 of um ^_^ I just love Sanctuary Decks !

Hantziie
05-07-2013, 02:33 AM
Looks pretty good. I love to play Sanctuary and i hope it turns to be more competitive with the new cards.

SvargasUA
05-07-2013, 07:40 AM
Vampire Assasin strikes back, lol. Another pit meat

r3tsa
05-07-2013, 10:37 AM
No, this one's synergy with other Sanctuary abilities is good enough to be competitive Vampire Assasin is nowhere close to it. x)

WalkingHawking
05-07-2013, 10:57 AM
This one will start giving some alternatives for sanctuary decks and not only "add every outmaneuver creature" and gl with your draws.
Btw. "destroy"? Will that be the same that kill? Or will the creature be totally removed from the game? Discuss xD

hydramarine
05-07-2013, 11:20 AM
I think you are confusing it with banish? Destory will probably send the creature straight to graveyard.

Not sure if DoC terminology favors "kill" over "destroy". It could be a translation error again.

nutlamb
05-07-2013, 11:28 AM
I think "destroy" is right.
The damage source is not SHINJE WARRIOR itself.
That's a divine punishment from TERTON!
Even if SHINJE WARRIOR is dead, death can still get you!

hydramarine
05-07-2013, 11:32 AM
It can be a translation error, because Altar of Asha and Soulreaver both uses the phrase kill instead of destroy. The cards are first drafted in French I think, thats why they have a lot of typos and stuff.

Uraxor
05-07-2013, 11:43 AM
It looks nice, but I really hope Sanct will get useful t2 and t4 drops, not more of t3 & t5s ... it has enough of those already .. :)

And I really like the artwork ^^

WalkingHawking
05-07-2013, 11:47 AM
I think you are confusing it with banish? Destory will probably send the creature straight to graveyard.

Not sure if DoC terminology favors "kill" over "destroy". It could be a translation error again.

Yeah, destroy is a different from kill or banish, so i'm wondering if it will mean something different or will be just another way to say the same :P
Nutlamb could be right tho.


It looks nice, but I really hope Sanct will get useful t2 and t4 drops, not more of t3 & t5s ... it has enough of those already .. :)

And I really like the artwork ^^

Be careful with your wishes, if Sanctuary gets good t1/2/4 drops it could become nearly unstoppable in a matter of seconds :P

r3tsa
05-07-2013, 11:57 AM
Yeah and next set we will see creatures immune to creature abilities. xd

Pulpeiro
05-07-2013, 01:42 PM
Destroy = your card is not in your deck anymore after match ;)

WalkingHawking
05-07-2013, 06:27 PM
Destroy = your card is not in your deck anymore after match ;)

Definitely that "destroy" word would cause some games turning into boxing combats if the game had a physical version xD

D-Emissary
05-07-2013, 07:45 PM
The artwork is great and i love his abiltiy :)

Shambell
05-07-2013, 11:21 PM
Not sure if DoC terminology favors "kill" over "destroy". It could be a translation error again.

Or perhaps it's because they try to standardize DoC terminologies...

ulpsz
05-07-2013, 11:22 PM
like the card but imo not worth being an epic...

I really want to see a naga warrior type creature with sweep attack..they have 4 arms for crying out loud:rolleyes:

Frozen-Drake
05-08-2013, 08:27 AM
yup shanria guard is still more efficient
i also think that nagas should have double attack or sweep attack thx to 4 arms

epicafricantoad
05-08-2013, 10:14 AM
Maybe the devs assumed 2 hands deal 1dmg each, the other two help the adjacent creatures (Honor: 2)? :D
cheers
Toad

WalkingHawking
05-08-2013, 10:21 AM
like the card but imo not worth being an epic...

I really want to see a naga warrior type creature with sweep attack..they have 4 arms for crying out loud:rolleyes:

There we go again, you and your way of thinking... where's written that epics have to be better than commons?

Maybe the devs assumed 2 hands deal 1dmg each, the other two help the adjacent creatures (Honor: 2)? :D
cheers
Toad

Just like one of your legs is epic, another one is african and the other one is a toad? Oh, wait, do numbers fit? :X
Sorry, but you can't be a troll anymore, Moderatrolls aren't accepted :\

GalemZ
05-08-2013, 01:39 PM
Terrible abbility...................VA is crying......

But I just think that Senc Deck need some new T2 creature...........

Bazaltovy
05-08-2013, 03:58 PM
Sorry, but you can't be a troll anymore, Moderatrolls aren't accepted :\

"I used to be [a troll]... Then I became a CM. :x"
- Aza404