PDA

View Full Version : was the 109 better than the IL-2



texhill88
07-28-2006, 10:50 AM
I have herd many things about the 109 and how it was better in many ways than the IL-2 but I still dont know. please help me out!

texhill88
07-28-2006, 10:50 AM
I have herd many things about the 109 and how it was better in many ways than the IL-2 but I still dont know. please help me out!

TC_Stele
07-28-2006, 10:56 AM
Hi, not sure if you're new to the game and community. But the planes have totally different roles. The 109 was a fighter while the IL-2 was a ground attack aircraft.

Xiolablu3
07-28-2006, 10:59 AM
Its like comparing an A10 Thunderbolt with a F22 raptor or a Jumbo Jet with a single seat racer airplane, they are totally different planes designed for different things.

The 109 was designed as a short range air superiority fighter. Performance is everything with the 109 and it was one of the best 2 fighters in the world 1937-1941.

The Il2 is a ground attack plane, very slow but is very heavily armoured and can carry a lot of bombs and rockets.

So you see its impossible to say which is the 'best'.

However the 109 definitely incorperated better technology than the Il2 sturmovik.

Hope this helps.

I suggest you read up on the IL2 Sturmovik and then you will see the problem that lies with your question. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

F6_Ace
07-28-2006, 11:01 AM
I think you will find this just as relevant:

http://www.sound-effect.com/sounds/human/BIGBURP.wav