PDA

View Full Version : Assassin's Creed – PC Specs



Pages : [1] 2

kazzoo
02-07-2008, 07:24 AM
Hi guys! Here are the official technical requirements for Assassin's Creed PC http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

System Requirements (List both minimum and reccommended):


Supported OS: Windows® XP/Windows Vista® (only) This product does not support Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP x64/Vista x64

Processor: Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 3800+ (Intel Core® 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or better recommended)

RAM: 1 GB Windows Xp / 2 GB Windows Vista

Video Card: 256 MB DirectX® 10.0–compliant video card or DirectX 9.0–compliant card with Shader Model 3.0 or higher (see supported list)*

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0 or 10.0–compliant sound card (5.1 sound card recommended)

DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0 or10.0 libraries (included on disc)

DVD-ROM: DVD-ROM dual-layer drive

Hard Drive Space: 8 GB

Peripherals Supported: Keyboard, mouse, optional controller (Xbox 360® Controller for Windows recommended)

Supported Video Cards at Time of Release: ATI® RADEON® X1600*/1650*-1950/HD 2000/3000 series NVIDIA GeForce® 6800*/7/8/9 series

*PCI Express only supported


Laptop versions of these cards may work but are NOT supported. These chipsets are the only ones that will run this game. For the most up-to-date minimum requirement listings, please visit the FAQ for this game on our support website at: http://support.ubi.com. (http://support.ubi.com)


NOTICE: This game contains technology intended to prevent copying that may conflict with some disc and virtual drives.

BTOG46
02-07-2008, 07:44 AM
Thanks Kazz, maybe this will shut up all the doubters. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Keksus
02-07-2008, 08:14 AM
Too late http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/5251069024/m/7321070236 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

BTOG46
02-07-2008, 09:36 AM
lol, stop splitting hairs, you posted a link to the German forums, I posted a link to the French forums, but Kazz posted the FIRST Official English info on these forums. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Keksus
02-07-2008, 09:42 AM
Maybe i should link this thread in my thread. So we can make a Link Collection to this news in different languages http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

BTOG46
02-07-2008, 10:58 AM
I see that the UBI Support have put the requirements back up for Assassins Creed, so it really is the Official Requirements.
http://ubisoft-en.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ubisoft_en.cfg/p...0x&p_li=&p_topview=1 (http://ubisoft-en.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ubisoft_en.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=12217&p_created=1202399795&p_sid=ImPo6KXi&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_lva=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9zb3J0X2J5PSZwX2dyaWRzb3J0PSZwX 3Jvd19jbnQ9MSwxJnBfcHJvZHM9ODgsMTU1NyZwX2NhdHM9MTE 4MyZwX3B2PTIuMTU1NyZwX2N2PTEuMTE4MyZwX3NlYXJjaF90e XBlPWFuc3dlcnMuc2VhcmNoX25sJnBfcGFnZT0x&p_li=&p_topview=1)

Yandrak
02-07-2008, 01:34 PM
Oh Great, I need buy a XP -.-"

I can play in Linux (Cedega)?
Or virtual machine in Linux?

BTOG46
02-07-2008, 01:38 PM
Originally posted by Yandrak:
I can play in Linux (Cedega)?
Or virtual machine in Linux?
Nope, the host OS can't share the Graphics card, it can only emulate a basic 64mb card on a virtual PC.
Looks like you need to buy XP. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

caswallawn_2k7
02-07-2008, 08:00 PM
get a oem version of windows got vista ultimate oem version for about £100 when it came out its normaly about £400 for the none upgrade version. pluss the only differance between oem and retail is you got get a instructions book in retail but if you know your way round a computer who needs it.

but if you are going to get xp you should make it quick ms have killed production of the discs and going to stop sales in the next few months to force people into vista.

I also have question about the spec since it needs a dual core cpu is it going to have a 64 bit version for the 64 bit version of vista?

Darth-Luke
02-08-2008, 03:25 PM
It is the first game, which need dual core processor. Crysis has lower system requirements.

I can't run this game on my computer. Ubisoft lost buyer. I will not buy it on XBOX360 or PS3. Ubi should work better at optimization.

BTOG46
02-08-2008, 03:37 PM
It maybe the first game that has a dual core as a minimum, but others have had dual core as the recommended, and in the next year or two, ALL cutting edge games will require dual core.

caswallawn_2k7
02-08-2008, 05:26 PM
technicaly games like crysis have a 64 bit version that is the real version of the game so to actualy get the most out of the games eventho they dont have the spec as high as this you still need it to play the game to its full potential.

Stealthguy1986
02-08-2008, 10:33 PM
I am still wondering what could be the reason for this 'Dual Core' requirement?? Is it due to poor optimization? or ubi made some improvements in the game (like A.I. and stuff)??What do you think guys??

Yandrak
02-09-2008, 01:56 AM
Originally posted by Yandrak:
Oh Great, I need buy a XP -.-"

I can play in Linux (Cedega)?
Or virtual machine in Linux?

ok, Thank
I have got a Xp Sp1 in a very old computer (128Ram, 500Mhz...). I only need to disassemble the computer, remove the hard disk and put it in my Pc good ...

Thanks

EDIT.
This is my computer:
SO Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium (And XP in a bit time...)
Manufacturer OS Microsoft Corporation
Manufacturer Acer system
Vacuum System Model M3610
Procesador Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, 2000 Mhz
Regional configuration Spain
Ram 1.790,94 MB
Video card: Ati Xpress 1200 (894MB)

Necros_hun
02-09-2008, 02:42 AM
Processor: Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 3800+ (Intel Core® 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or better recommended)

Can I run the game with a single core, 3GHz CPU? I hope so... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

Video Card: 256 MB DirectX® 10.0–compliant video card or DirectX 9.0–compliant card with Shader Model 3.0 or higher (see supported list)*

Supported Video Cards at Time of Release: ATI® RADEON® X1600*/1650*-1950/HD 2000/3000 series NVIDIA GeForce® 6800*/7/8/9 series

*PCI Express only supported
So, people with AGP cards can't play with the game? That's F'ed up... I mean I can run UT3 and Gears of War very well, without problems and you're telling me my 7600GT is not good enough for this? http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif


I know that Ubisoft doesn't really care about the PC gamers but this is surprising even from them. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

BTOG46
02-09-2008, 04:54 AM
I think you misread the requirements, the PCI-Express requirement is only on the lower level cards, RADEON® X1600*/1650* and GeForce® 6800*.
So your 7600GT should be ok.

Necros_hun
02-10-2008, 12:03 AM
Originally posted by BTOG46:
I think you misread the requirements, the PCI-Express requirement is only on the lower level cards, RADEON® X1600*/1650* and GeForce® 6800*.
So your 7600GT should be ok.
Oh, ok... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif Anyway, I hope the game will run well.

pietjevlip
02-11-2008, 05:43 AM
So I should be fine, nice work... oh, that's really egoistic of me, now is it? :|

caswallawn_2k7
02-11-2008, 09:29 AM
you should be fine to play the game with your pc but i wouldnt bet on getting high graphics as the 8600 is actualy lower than some of the geforce 7's and since this has higher spec than hellgate london and my 8800GT cant run it with the advanced graphics options on i put money on this is going ot be a ***** for even the top end cards.

BTOG46
02-11-2008, 10:03 AM
I completely agree with you there mate, just because a card is from a later series, doesn't mean it's automatically more powerful than an older one.
A 7900 or an X1950 will blow away lower end Dx10 cards.

caswallawn_2k7
02-11-2008, 12:02 PM
actualy went from a 7900GT to a 8800GT and vista gave the 8800 0.1 more on the scoring than the 7900 and to be totaly honest if i had got it for any other reason than my 7900 died i would of been pissed off differance is minnor unless you play a dx10 game.

viper_soul
02-11-2008, 06:09 PM
hi ppl...
i have a laptop with the Geforce 8400M GT 256Mb/1024 Mb.

can i play this game?

because in the specs they say that laptop versons may work, but i want to be sure before buy the game.

Ghost_Hybrid
02-11-2008, 11:38 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
actualy went from a 7900GT to a 8800GT and vista gave the 8800 0.1 more on the scoring than the 7900 and to be totaly honest if i had got it for any other reason than my 7900 died i would of been pissed off differance is minnor unless you play a dx10 game.


Are you serious?

You come here and post your old card and new card and do an assumption based on 2 pieces of hardware?

What is or was the rest of your system, last time I checked video cards didnt run a whole computer.

caswallawn_2k7
02-12-2008, 09:55 AM
ghost if you were smart enough to actualy look at the spec of the 2 cards the differance between a 7900gt and a 8800gt is about 50mhz the ram speed is the same and the 8800 has slightly higher number of pipelines. why do you think nvidia still sell the low end geforce 7's but killed off the top end cards?

if you look on nvidias web site all the actual data on the cards is there and their site even 7900's to be just below the 8800's but then they must be lying its not like they actualy make the card or anything.

APPLEGUY_77
02-12-2008, 11:53 AM
Well i play this game on a Nvida 88042 Graphics card and i have no problem with it and it is cheeper than most Graphics cards and its a 512!

Ghost_Hybrid
02-12-2008, 12:23 PM
Are you emotionally challenged?

Last time I checked, video cards dont run a pc!

So dont come in here and post your review on two cards without giving us the rest of what is running your pc.

caswallawn_2k7
02-12-2008, 02:41 PM
ok then vista ultimate X64
AMD 64 4800 X2
2.5 gig ram
400 gig maxtor sata 2 hard drive with 16mb cache
500 gig segate sata 2 hard drive with 16mb cache

the simple fact is even the figures on nvidia.com will tell you that the 7900's are above all geforce 8's other than the 8800's. the fact is in a graphicly intense game the graphics card is a huge factor alot more of a factor than the cpu.

if you would care to look at http://www.nvidia.com/object/graphics_cards_buy_now.html you will see the 7600 falls just short of the 8600 just because a card is next gen doesnt mean it is higher the geforce 8 cards came out on the thing they are dx10 cards they were not speced alot higher altho the geforce 9 benchmarks arnt coming in that differant from the geforce 8's either.

Ghost_Hybrid
02-12-2008, 08:04 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
ok then vista ultimate X64
AMD 64 4800 X2
2.5 gig ram
400 gig maxtor sata 2 hard drive with 16mb cache
500 gig segate sata 2 hard drive with 16mb cache

the simple fact is even the figures on nvidia.com will tell you that the 7900's are above all geforce 8's other than the 8800's. the fact is in a graphicly intense game the graphics card is a huge factor alot more of a factor than the cpu.

if you would care to look at http://www.nvidia.com/object/graphics_cards_buy_now.html you will see the 7600 falls just short of the 8600 just because a card is next gen doesnt mean it is higher the geforce 8 cards came out on the thing they are dx10 cards they were not speced alot higher altho the geforce 9 benchmarks arnt coming in that differant from the geforce 8's either.

And for the most part I agree with you...I wasnt disagreeing with your idea, just your presentation.

I wonder though, are you running raid 0 with those hd's? Dont they need to be the same size in order to utilize raid benefits?

Or is it the cache....

Your system is begging for more ram..x64 likes 4gigs.

Are your 2 cpu's equivelant to one quad series cpu, if so which one?>

Inregards to the video card hype, yes buying a card that has similar specs to an older one is a waste of money.

Many dont realize that they couldve just overclocked thier current card and granted themselves the same results.

So you are right.

pietjevlip
02-13-2008, 05:58 AM
with "AMD 64 4800 X2", do you mean two single AMD 64 4800's, or one dual-core CPU? (Which actually is two of those sealed together:P)

In both cases, I don't think its gonna get equal with a quad...

caswallawn_2k7
02-13-2008, 09:12 AM
amd 64 4800 x2 is the full name of the chip it has 2 cores normaly at 2.4ghz each and as far as the intel quads go yes they may have more cores but no software has been made to reconise them alot of programs wont even use more than one. also alot of the bench marks on the quad core intels and amd's havnt been to impessive to be honest. but then you have to remeber my pc is about 2 years old now but in the end if you are playing graphic intensive games you cpu will not make up the gap as the way the 2 handle data is totaly differant meaning the cpu is unable to render anything at the speed it would be needed.

BTOG46
02-13-2008, 09:45 AM
Depends on the game though, some make much more use of the CPU than others, after all, you do play RTS games cas http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
And there are some FPS games where the CPU power can limit the fps that can be displayed, although normally it's the power of the GPU that limits it.

xyBaX
02-13-2008, 09:49 AM
What BTOG said is correct. For example, on Flight Simulator the CPU can bottleneck performance quite a lot. On others, not so much.

caswallawn_2k7
02-13-2008, 01:08 PM
with rts games it uses more proccessor power as the computer needs to track and proccess everything at the same time on screen and off but the graphics card is only actualy rendering what is in view and if it is a game that uses a cache it will pre load the textures into the memory but not actualy use any gpu power as its not rendering them.

but any way you look at on a low end geforce 8 you will never get the same power as a top end card and still not be far above the geforce 7's as without the extra pipe lines and rendering speed of the higher cards you can do anything you want and you still wont get a graphics improvment. hell you can run 2 quad core intells and the 8600 will still do the same you can never boost it without doing something like getting sli.

pietjevlip
02-14-2008, 03:32 AM
I will not try to boost my 8600GT with Sly... i'll get a 512MB 9800 instead http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

Not just jet, I don't feel I need to upgrade this 5-months-old machine. I'm on a budget too http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif

Christeent
02-15-2008, 05:17 AM
Hello,
My pc spec. is:
Intel Core 2 CPU 6600 2.4Ghz(2cpu)
2048RAM
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 512Mb Graphics Card(Pixel Shader Model 3.0,DirectX 10 compliant)
Realtek HD Audio Output sound card
DirectX 9.0c
DVD R/RW/DL
Free Hard Drive:90Gb

Is my PC compliant to Assassin's Creed?
Could I play the game at its optimised graphic perfomance?

xyBaX
02-15-2008, 08:19 AM
Originally posted by Christeent:
Hello,
My pc spec. is:
Intel Core 2 CPU 6600 2.4Ghz(2cpu)
2048RAM
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 512Mb Graphics Card(Pixel Shader Model 3.0,DirectX 10 compliant)
Realtek HD Audio Output sound card
DirectX 9.0c
DVD R/RW/DL
Free Hard Drive:90Gb

Is my PC compliant to Assassin's Creed?
Could I play the game at its optimised graphic perfomance? 1) Yes.

2) Probably not.

caswallawn_2k7
02-15-2008, 01:50 PM
Originally posted by xyBaX:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Christeent:
Hello,
My pc spec. is:
Intel Core 2 CPU 6600 2.4Ghz(2cpu)
2048RAM
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 512Mb Graphics Card(Pixel Shader Model 3.0,DirectX 10 compliant)
Realtek HD Audio Output sound card
DirectX 9.0c
DVD R/RW/DL
Free Hard Drive:90Gb

Is my PC compliant to Assassin's Creed?
Could I play the game at its optimised graphic perfomance? 1) Yes.

2) Probably not. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

also since he says he only has directx 9.0c im asuming he is on xp so wont get the directx 10 options also is he sure the 8400 is only pixel shader 3? as the directx 10 cards are pixel shader 4.0 and directx 10.1 (vista sp1) is pixel shader 4.1

Alex_HS
02-16-2008, 04:17 AM
Hmm, it sounds interesting and im over the specs but i find them kinda high for a console port, infact i will wait for the reviews to see if they did a decent job porting this.

Jade_Samurai
02-17-2008, 03:25 AM
You guys have all been crapping on about gfx cards and performance and that graphic heavy games will rely mostly on video card performance.
the cold hard fact is that with a game as complex as AC all of you with happy 8 series cards will still be left in the dark if you cpu wont cut the AI, physics, another major part of current games is heavily relyent on CPU speed.

Im not too optimistic about my own machiens performance:
Intel P4 single core 3.6gHz @ 4.4gHz
Asus 7800GTX OCed to - something faster then stock!
3 gig DDR2 667
2x segate 500gb HDD's
Asus P5LD2-Deluxe mobo

I think i can scrape through, i dont think i can OC my CPU much more, 55oC full load on a hot day (35-40oC)

If i was to buy another machine today, i would buy 2 x 8800GT 's in Sli, rather then one GTS or even GTX, reasons, they are faster in Sli then the GTX by up to 50% they are also $200-$400(AUD) cheaper then the GTX. I do realise you cant go Tri-Sli with GT's but from my exp, trying to buy another 7800GTX these days to go Sli has killed me, i cant find them anywhere! so stuff furture proofing with SLi, go all out so you dont need to future proof... YOU ARE THE FUTURE!

But realisticly, this game will rely just as heavily on CPU as it does on GPU, this is one of those games you really need a well rounded system to get anything out of it without serious bottlenecks.

1 stop solution, Water cooling, and OC the bageezas out of everything!

caswallawn_2k7
02-17-2008, 03:34 PM
speaking of physics nvidia is working on a new driver that lets any geforce 8 or above card act as a physics card so that one more reason why the graphics card will be more important if it takes over controlle of physics. as far as needing the cpu for ai you do realise 90% of the npc's in the game will run on scripts and wont actualy need much computer interaction till the player interact with them.

Jade_Samurai
02-18-2008, 01:56 AM
Ai and scripting is a big difference yes, and i take as you say, 90% of it will be scripted, but still, without a high end CPU youll be stuck when it comes to fully rendering levels (yes i say render) its not the gfx cards job to put the buildings there! just make them looks like buildings!

caswallawn_2k7
02-18-2008, 06:35 AM
your getting terms mixed up there as the graphics card renders the building from a mesh using a location point it is given the info for building location is nothing more than x, y, z co-ordinate that tells the graphics card were it should draw the building in relation to the point 0,0,0 the graphics card uses similar data on the player location to determin what the player should or souldnt be seeing so the work for graphics by the cpu is nothing more than a few numbers.

DjGuZ
02-21-2008, 10:10 PM
Only PCI-E SUPPORTED ??

Please if AGP's are not supported, and when you are about to play the game, it doesn't work, please release a patch please, i exceed the minimum system requirements but i have a AGP 8x graphics card. And i cant change it right now because i bought it 5 months ago and graphic cards are very expensive in my country !!

blarson11
02-22-2008, 12:51 AM
nope.


Originally posted by BTOG46:
I think you misread the requirements, the PCI-Express requirement is only on the lower level cards, RADEON® X1600*/1650* and GeForce® 6800*.

so unless your card is one of those, you should be fine http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

caswallawn_2k7
02-22-2008, 04:56 AM
I'm actualy suprised any1 with the cpu needed to play this actualy has agp as pci-e was out before the dual cores.

BTOG46
02-22-2008, 05:10 AM
A lot of socket LGA 775 boards used by some system suppliers had AGP instead of PCI-Express, and a lot had dual core support, mainly for the Pentium D, but there were some core 2 duo as well.

caswallawn_2k7
02-22-2008, 05:44 AM
well that explains it all the pc's i've built since the dual cores came out have been amd so thats probly why i havnt seen a dual core with agp.

DjGuZ
02-22-2008, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by blarson11:
nope.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by BTOG46:
I think you misread the requirements, the PCI-Express requirement is only on the lower level cards, RADEON® X1600*/1650* and GeForce® 6800*.

so unless your card is one of those, you should be fine http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Oh thanks man, you have saved my day !! I am so happy this game!!! Its a feeling, i cant wait until its released !!

DjGuZ
02-22-2008, 07:55 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I'm actualy suprised any1 with the cpu needed to play this actualy has agp as pci-e was out before the dual cores.

Ok man, listen, while a GeForce 7600GT costs 100 bucks in the USA, here in uruguay (IN THE CHEAPEST STORE) costs 247 dollars !!!

caswallawn_2k7
02-22-2008, 08:00 PM
Originally posted by DjGuZ:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I'm actualy suprised any1 with the cpu needed to play this actualy has agp as pci-e was out before the dual cores.

Ok man, listen, while a GeForce 7600GT costs 100 bucks in the USA, here in uruguay (IN THE CHEAPEST STORE) costs 247 dollars !!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

you must be looking in the wrong places then plus im from the uk and the uk is anything but cheap here is a 8600 GT 512md for £47.99 and that is actualy under $100 http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX...&catid=56&subcat=912 (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-075-OK&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=912)

ltolman
02-22-2008, 09:04 PM
One of the great things I was told about with Crysis is the ability to achieve superior graphic quality settings now and even a year or so from now.

You see ironically enough I cannot play the game at a High/Very High Setting; only Medium; even when you take a look at my specs the optimal settings say Medium:

AMD Athlon 6400 x2 5400 ~ 2.8gig
2gigs of RAM
PNY XLR8 GeForce 8800; 768mb
Vista Index Rating: 5.3 (CPU)

Though ironically my friend who just re built his system which had a Intel Duo Core (I forget which model #) running at 3.0+ ghz and having 4gigs of RAM with the same Video card running a Vista Index of 5.7; surprisingly his system detected everything at a Very High setting.

Anyways so I see awesome graphics with that game and when I decide to upgrade my processor or memory (which I hope its soon lol) that when I replay the game I will still be in awe.

So why am I talking about Crysis? Well it leads to the topic of Assassins Creed

I just read an article where Ubisoft lowered the system requirements for this game so therefore I'm asking Ubisoft or anyone, I guess, lol that is this game still gonna be fully optimized for future hardware? As I just said above, Crysis looks awesome at Medium settings, so if I upgrade my CPU or Memory and replay it at Very High, I'll still be in awe even 1 year from now. So again, likewise will that be a part of Assassins Creed? Or is this product based on only 1 type of code which means that those that get Direct x 10.1; have the latest hardware; are we gonna have some stability issues (gameplay??)

Here is the information I found:

Some of you may remember our earlier news item about the rather steep minimum requirements of the forthcoming PC version of Ubisoft's hit Assassin's Creed. Those specs were quickly pulled from the web, but Ubisoft have done the right thing and put them back up, with changes.

The differences are minor but they do bring the specs back down, closer to Earth!

Memory Requirements
Previously they were 2GB min, 3GB recommended
Now they are just a minimum of 1GB for Windows XP, and 2GB for Windows Vista
Hard Drive Space
Previously 12GB, now 8GB
GPU suggestions
Used to be ATI RADEON X1300 or NVIDIA GeForce 6600 as the lowest
Now set to an ATI Radeon X1600 or NVIDIA GeForce 6800
Other than that, the same dual-core CPU and Shader Model 3.0 graphics card requirements are still there. It'll be interesting to see how well the game will run on single-core CPUs (if at all).



And the link:

http://www.yougamers.com/news/17833_assassins_creed_min_requirements_updated/

blarson11
02-22-2008, 11:52 PM
well it wont run on a single core, it says so in the revised specs....

caswallawn_2k7
02-23-2008, 07:10 AM
nope it wont run on a dual core pc and and if you look into the spec it fully supports dx10 as for dx10.1 for the minor differance it wont cause a problem.

DjGuZ
02-23-2008, 08:43 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DjGuZ:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I'm actualy suprised any1 with the cpu needed to play this actualy has agp as pci-e was out before the dual cores.

Ok man, listen, while a GeForce 7600GT costs 100 bucks in the USA, here in uruguay (IN THE CHEAPEST STORE) costs 247 dollars !!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

you must be looking in the wrong places then plus im from the uk and the uk is anything but cheap here is a 8600 GT 512md for £47.99 and that is actualy under $100 http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX...&catid=56&subcat=912 (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-075-OK&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=912) </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Ok first, that card you mentioned costs 56 dollars not 48!! And with that explanation you are giving me the reason, while a 7600GT apg costs 40 dollars here it costs 247 dollars!!

maddog111
02-24-2008, 03:08 AM
ok my pc has
windows Xp Home Premium
Intel(R)Core(TM)2 CPU
T5600 @ 1.83 GHz
1GB Ram
Hard Disk is 107 GB http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
7300 Geforce card

LAPTOP ..

peeves87
02-24-2008, 08:00 AM
If your laptop does manage to run it, you'll be probably running it at its lowest setting.
A Geforce 7300M just isn't good enough to run a game like AC

caswallawn_2k7
02-24-2008, 08:11 AM
a 7300 is about the same as a geforce 6 and they can run the game the fact is this game could be like bioshock and run at high settings on just about any pc untill some1 gets hold and tries the game no1 knows

maddog111
02-24-2008, 09:08 AM
what if i put everything in low?can i still play it??

caswallawn_2k7
02-24-2008, 10:02 AM
you most likly will be able to play it but as the spec says laptop models may work but arnt supported this is because the hardware in them is totaly differant from a desktop all you can do is try it.

maddog111
02-24-2008, 10:19 AM
ty for the info....i guess ill have to wait for a mother F***ing ps3...

BTOG46
02-24-2008, 11:46 AM
If only they would just release a demo, people would know whether it would run ok, or whether they would need to upgrade.

caswallawn_2k7
02-24-2008, 02:38 PM
but also releasing a dome could show you need a pc that is alot higher than they say then they wouldnt sell the game http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif

but yeh they realy should release a demo of some sort but its free running across building tops when the graphics would be hit hardest.

thesnaky
02-24-2008, 02:56 PM
Hey, will I be able to run Assassin's Creed in descent resolution?

-Windows Vista
-2 Gig of RAM
-Intel Core 2 CPU 1,80 Ghz 1,80 Ghz
-Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

Jade_Samurai
02-24-2008, 10:53 PM
Well, as you can see in the specs, your lacking in ram, and your cpu speed could be abit better! but i think you may just have slow load times, no really big in game issues, as for the 8600GT... well its the 8600 gt! personaly i dont like anything with numbers less then 800 from nVidia! i have a 7800GTX and a single core P4 3.6ghz @ 4.4ghz, i think im just going to have some HUGE load times, but i think i will still be able to run it, anyone who says no i think doesn;t know what they are talking about, and if ubisoft said nothing single will run this, i think is so they cant be hit with idiots asking why they cant run in on there celeron CPU's (WOOooo!!! 1.4ghz SINGLE core! blazing speed)

so my answer to your question is... maybe http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif

blarson11
02-25-2008, 02:38 AM
hehe i have a celeron D! far more advanced then the regular celerons!

j/k lol. anyone who thinks that is adequate for gaming these days probably doesnt do much gaming to begin with on PC's. that of course, is why i have my console, in addition to my inadequate PC http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif

caswallawn_2k7
02-25-2008, 02:22 PM
Originally posted by Jade_Samurai:
Well, as you can see in the specs, your lacking in ram, and your cpu speed could be abit better! but i think you may just have slow load times, no really big in game issues, as for the 8600GT... well its the 8600 gt! personaly i dont like anything with numbers less then 800 from nVidia! i have a 7800GTX and a single core P4 3.6ghz @ 4.4ghz, i think im just going to have some HUGE load times, but i think i will still be able to run it, anyone who says no i think doesn;t know what they are talking about, and if ubisoft said nothing single will run this, i think is so they cant be hit with idiots asking why they cant run in on there celeron CPU's (WOOooo!!! 1.4ghz SINGLE core! blazing speed)

so my answer to your question is... maybe http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif

he isnt lacking in ram the spec only says 2gb gues you only read the old wrong spec. also if you think a fast single core will ever have the power of a duel core you are the one who actualy has no clue about a computer as the interface and data transfer is totaly differant. as for the comments saying duel core requirement will stop the idiots with slow cpu's getting it i gues you fall into that group.

thesnaky
02-25-2008, 04:12 PM
So, the answer is a yes or a no? lol

davo81
02-25-2008, 04:16 PM
Originally posted by thesnaky:
So, the answer is a yes or a no? lol

Yes, but you wont be able to run Anti-Alising or Antroscopic Filtering and i doubt you will be able to run it above 1024 x 768 and probably medium-ish settings..thats just my opinoin tho...(expect glitching and lock-ups as your cpu is quite low end for a core 2 duo).

FYTJ
02-26-2008, 07:03 AM
Oh, and by the way, you can check if your computer can run it or not over here (http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest).
I, for example, can run it but only slowly. That's why I think I'm not going to buy the computer version.

thesnaky
02-26-2008, 03:08 PM
Thanks to everyone for the answers! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

Jade_Samurai
02-26-2008, 11:39 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jade_Samurai:
Well, as you can see in the specs, your lacking in ram, and your cpu speed could be abit better! but i think you may just have slow load times, no really big in game issues, as for the 8600GT... well its the 8600 gt! personaly i dont like anything with numbers less then 800 from nVidia! i have a 7800GTX and a single core P4 3.6ghz @ 4.4ghz, i think im just going to have some HUGE load times, but i think i will still be able to run it, anyone who says no i think doesn;t know what they are talking about, and if ubisoft said nothing single will run this, i think is so they cant be hit with idiots asking why they cant run in on there celeron CPU's (WOOooo!!! 1.4ghz SINGLE core! blazing speed)

so my answer to your question is... maybe http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif

he isnt lacking in ram the spec only says 2gb gues you only read the old wrong spec. also if you think a fast single core will ever have the power of a duel core you are the one who actualy has no clue about a computer as the interface and data transfer is totaly differant. as for the comments saying duel core requirement will stop the idiots with slow cpu's getting it i gues you fall into that group. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


Well look, for vista its 2 gig min just for the operating system, i would never run vista on anything less, so YES MINIMUM! IS LACKING and you can hardly argue otherwise.
ALSO! i never said anything about a single core being as fast as duel core, EVER... did i say that... i don't think i did, i mean, im looking at my post right now... and Oh look, NOTHING about how single cores can be faster then duel core... whats this... i didn't even mention that my cpu was fast, high speed, or beats the competition. Now look, as far as ive seen, no-one with slow CPU's has really asked about if they can run this game, mostly because they know they cant, looking at the specs, and anyway, its clear i was being sarcastic anyway '1.4ghz', if you cant understand sarcasm.. Hurrah for you trully great job http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

Sivlar
02-27-2008, 12:10 PM
I will be interested to see how it perfoms on my box. Hope I don't have to turn the detail down too low. Been waiting awhile for this game.

AMD 4800+ 64 X2
2GB DDR RAM
GeForce 7950 GX2 1GB (512MB per GPU) PCI-E 16x
WD 150GB HD 10K RPM 16MB Cache
Windows XP Pro

-Siv

mlsk8
02-27-2008, 06:35 PM
My PC

Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (build 2600)
3.20 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+
Board: ASUSTeK Computer INC. M2N-E SLI 1.XX
Bus Clock: 200 megahertz
2048 Megabytes Installed Memory
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS 256MB

Is my PC enough at least to play it in good conditions with no stopping images? like a low FPS

FYTJ
02-28-2008, 06:07 AM
Originally posted by mlsk8:
My PC

Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (build 2600)
3.20 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+
Board: ASUSTeK Computer INC. M2N-E SLI 1.XX
Bus Clock: 200 megahertz
2048 Megabytes Installed Memory
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS 256MB

Is my PC enough at least to play it in good conditions with no stopping images? like a low FPS
I've already sad it but since nobody seems to acknowledge it, I'LL do it one last time:
<span class="ev_code_RED"> HAVE A LOOKHERE!!!!!! (http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest)</span>

webswinger93
02-28-2008, 06:44 PM
Originally posted by FYTJ:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by mlsk8:
My PC

Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (build 2600)
3.20 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+
Board: ASUSTeK Computer INC. M2N-E SLI 1.XX
Bus Clock: 200 megahertz
2048 Megabytes Installed Memory
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS 256MB

Is my PC enough at least to play it in good conditions with no stopping images? like a low FPS
I've already sad it but since nobody seems to acknowledge it, I'LL do it one last time:
<span class="ev_code_RED"> HAVE A LOOKHERE!!!!!! (http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest)</span> </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Having a bad day? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif

My comp totally sucks. It can't even play Thief: Deadly Shadows. You know that old game?
I tried it a while ago and the lag is unbelievable. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

blarson11
02-28-2008, 07:56 PM
my computer can only run flash based web games....stupid integrated graphics cards...http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif

Jade_Samurai
02-29-2008, 05:35 PM
LOL, ah well, 'integrated graphics' are maybe the dirtiest words in computing!

Dalver
02-29-2008, 10:38 PM
Originally posted by FYTJ:
I've already sad it but since nobody seems to acknowledge it, I'LL do it one last time:
<span class="ev_code_RED"> HAVE A LOOKHERE!!!!!! (http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest)</span>

Stop posting system requirements check pages. I've tried several of those all telling me I could barely run a game on minimum. The reality being that I could run everything on full with some tweaks, like say shadows off, or aa off or a notch down on the resolution and everything would flow like water. Don't trust any of those sites, even if they say no you might still be very able to play without a hitch. Use those sites more like a guide not like a rule.

That being out of the way, I'm really curious how well my single core will run AC...

davo81
03-01-2008, 03:06 AM
Originally posted by dalver:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by FYTJ:
I've already sad it but since nobody seems to acknowledge it, I'LL do it one last time:
<span class="ev_code_RED"> HAVE A LOOKHERE!!!!!! (http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest)</span>

Stop posting system requirements check pages. I've tried several of those all telling me I could barely run a game on minimum. The reality being that I could run everything on full with some tweaks, like say shadows off, or aa off or a notch down on the resolution and everything would flow like water. Don't trust any of those sites, even if they say no you might still be very able to play without a hitch. Use those sites more like a guide not like a rule.

That being out of the way, I'm really curious how well my single core will run AC... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

A single core CPU will NOT run it..even it had the slightest chance it wouldn't...the installer will probably say "One or more of your components does not meet the minimum requirements for this game...canceling installation.." You need a multi core CPU so it can process multiple AI/physics etc at the same time instead of creating a "list" which would create immense ammounts of hang and lagg. Even the PS3 & 360 have multiple cores.

Dalver
03-01-2008, 03:11 AM
We will know for sure when the game is released. Until then...

x_101_
03-01-2008, 04:26 AM
Woot!system requirements lab says i can play it not on full but i can play it!! mabye i have a new sig......http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb14/x_101_/requirements.jpg

boda89
03-02-2008, 06:01 AM
My pc specs are
6700 quad core
3GB ram
8800GTX in SLI
OS:XP service pack 2
Can I run it in all high settings?
another question
can my old 6200a run it as it runs crysis in low settings?
Regards

FYTJ
03-02-2008, 06:07 AM
Me has a question: on most sites where they talk about AC specs they say that ubi recommends a 512mb graphics card. But on the ubisoft page, here and at system requirement labs it doesn't say that. In fact, system requirement labs only talk about a 256mb as recommended. Now I know that ubisoft had released higher specs first and had to bring them down a little later. But I'm not sure if that was changed or not. What do we need to play "recommended"? And is it better to have an average graphics card with 512mb or a better graphics card with 256mb? What do you guys reckon?

BTOG46
03-02-2008, 06:32 AM
is it better to have an average graphics card with 512mb or a better graphics card with 256mb? What do you guys reckon?
It depends on the card and whether a game you play on it needs to load in large texture blocks.
As an example, two different memory sizes of the same model of card may use different memory, as a rough guide, some 512mb cards may use GDDDR2 memory, while the 256mb version uses much faster GDDR3, an example of a card that does this is the ATI X1650.
My own preference would be to go for a better card with lower memory than a weak card with higher memory, as it isn't just memory size that's important, of course, if money were no object, high memory on a better card would be best.

caswallawn_2k7
03-02-2008, 08:17 AM
yeh cash was tight when i needed my new card so got a 8800 GT with 256 gddr3 as alot of the 512 ones around the same price were only gddr2 and i work on the theory i may have half the amount on gddr3but the speed differance makes up for the card using some system ram.

FYTJ
03-02-2008, 10:15 AM
Thanks for the advice. I'll probably be upgrading this summer anyway but till then 256mb will do I guess.

davo81
03-03-2008, 12:27 AM
Have any PC screenshots surfaced yet? I'm curious how much better the PC version will be. (with Direct X 10 & 10.1)

caswallawn_2k7
03-03-2008, 01:36 AM
dx 10.1 isnt out yet it comes with vista service pack one supposadly but it isnt in the release candidate copy. also i havnt seen a card that uses pixel shader 4.1 yet as even the 9600 only uses 4.0

davo81
03-03-2008, 02:01 AM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
dx 10.1 isnt out yet it comes with vista service pack one supposadly but it isnt in the release candidate copy. also i havnt seen a card that uses pixel shader 4.1 yet as even the 9600 only uses 4.0

Vista SP1 comes out in a month (ish) and ac is probably going to be pre-build for it. The 9600 GT does use Direct X 10.1 but they can't publish that fact because Vista SP1 isn't out and therefore if a customer bought one and couldn't run dx 10.1 there would be a law suit. When Vista SP1 comes out it will "enable" the 9600 GT to use dx10.1

caswallawn_2k7
03-03-2008, 02:35 AM
new computers already have vista service pack one as it is out on the oem copies that shops sell. and service pack 1 release candidates have been out since january to the public i have the latest one and it still doesnt have dx 10.1 and as i said the physical specs of the 9600 says it is shader 4.0 the same as a geforce 8 when people know 10.1 is coming why would nvidia hide their own spec making the card look worse when they actualy want to sell the thing.

Jade_Samurai
03-03-2008, 10:55 PM
I think they are downplaying there 9600 card because it will be a bigger step up for there high end 9 series cards from what it looks like, they will kick the pants off the current 8 series, but who knows,
i want to go sli with my 7800gtx, but i cant find anyone selling it! the best i can do is $1000 AUD, which is twice as much as a payed for the one i have now, which is factory OCed with 5nv silencer heatsink from arctic cooling, very good stuff (got it in japan)

so i think nVidia are donwplaying there 9600 so people will be like, 'HEY! shader model 4.0, DX 10.1 OMG thats new, hasn't been out for months on the other much more not good card they already have' and then BAM! more ATi kicking for nVidia followed by the wolf processors from intel, and more AMD flogging with 45nm architecture, poor AMD/ATI!!

SgtReaper1987
03-04-2008, 03:43 AM
Well for starters the nvidia 9800 is just a overclocked version ov 8800gts G92 while the newly released 9600GT is based on G94 neither of supports Dx10.1 or Shader 4.1, so there should not be any dramatical performence boost in the new cards from nividia. On the other hand all of AMD/ATI Radeon HD3k-series support DX10.1 and Shadermodel 4.1, so i think it will be ATI kicking Nvidia *** this time around.

Secondly just wondering why it says that you cant play on vista x64. It works fine for me, except for some annoying freezes from time to time. And i presume that will be worked out in a patch later.

Cromar123
03-04-2008, 04:21 AM
Can i even run it?

AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+, 2.0GHz
1gb of ram
NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT
Windows XP

requirements lab says i fail at the processor so..i still hope i can atleast run this on low..if at all

caswallawn_2k7
03-04-2008, 05:16 AM
the 9600 also has about half the pipelines that the 8800's do and that is why its half the price of the 8800 ultra's as the 9600 is just another one of the nvidia cards made to sell people a lower card beliving it is the next gen card.

@jade: I had that same problem when i wanted to replace my 7900 it turns out nvidia kills off the top end of a range when the new ones come out as the 7900 is actualy higher than the 8600. so its just basicaly a case of nvidia wanting to force gamers to pay a stupid price or buy the newest card.

hutzdani
03-04-2008, 01:40 PM
Well Thats great i Trounced the Spec's http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/1522/yaygj5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Quad Q6600 @ 3.02Ghz
8800GT 512Mb (Second Gen) 720Core 940Mem
DX9.0c
Xp Pro
4Gig OCZ Platnium Ram

Highist Setting i hope http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Jade_Samurai
03-04-2008, 01:48 PM
thats an awesome system you have there, the only thing i would do to it is sli that GT while they are still avalible! the cheapest and most awesome performance boost for your beast!

Stodleh
03-04-2008, 02:07 PM
I tried running it for the first time today and it lagged like crazy...even on the lowest graphic settings !

I have a laptop with these specs:

HP Pavilion dv6500 Notebook PC
Vista
2 GB Ram
64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-55, 1800 Mhz
GeForce 7150M/nForce 630M

What is it that I need to improve to get the game to run smoothly?

BTOG46
03-04-2008, 02:21 PM
I tried running it for the first time today and it lagged like crazy...even on the lowest graphic settings !

I have a laptop with these specs:
HP Pavilion dv6500 Notebook PC
Vista
2 GB Ram
64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-55, 1800 Mhz
GeForce 7150M/nForce 630M

What is it that I need to improve to get the game to run smoothly?

1:
A better computer
2:
A legal copy of the game, when It gets released.

Cromar123
03-04-2008, 03:14 PM
Reposting mine Can i even run it?

AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+, 2.0GHz
1gb of ram
NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT
Windows XP

requirements lab says i fail at the processor so..i still hope i can atleast run this on low..if at all

moqqy
03-04-2008, 03:27 PM
Originally posted by Cromar123:
Reposting mine Can i even run it?

AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+, 2.0GHz
1gb of ram
NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT
Windows XP

requirements lab says i fail at the processor so..i still hope i can atleast run this on low..if at all

WHY ARE YOU REPOSTING THAT, WHAT THE HELL? WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO SAY HUH? IT'S ALL GON' BE ALL RIGHT BOY IT'S ALL GON BE ALL RIGHT?

Jade_Samurai
03-04-2008, 03:37 PM
woah, calm down there!
take a step back and have some tea, nice herbal relaxing tea
@cormar

you so fail on the processor, but you fail on it by a lot unfortunately, that said, when they say 'nVidia 7 series' that includes things like the extremely low end 7 series, your not too low, but its not nearly as fast as say a 7800 or 7900, because its 2.2ghz duel core, really what your looking at is about 5 ghz single core, but youll never make up the kind of performance you would get from thred optimized apps on single core CPU's, even the fastest ones, i have an OCed 3.6ghz P4 @ 4.4ghz, wich is more then twice the speed of yours,

you could try OCing your CPU, and you may get a better chance, unfortunately requirement labs dont detect clock speeds, just part No. or type.

i think on my 4.4ghz cpu ill be able to run it, maybe not well! but i think ill be able to do it, for you on the other hand, i would be far less optimistic, if you got yourself another gig of ram, to 2 gig, i would be less weary, but certainly you need a faster CPU, weather through OCing or replacement. otherwise youll have an awesome time looking at loading screens till the cows come home!
sorry mate

ApiariusV
03-04-2008, 11:10 PM
Hi to all http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
Can someone please help me if my laptop can play the game http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif

my system specs are

XP PRO windows
AMD Turion 64 Mobile Technology ML-37 - is more than 2.00 GHz
ATI X700 up to 512MB Hyper Memory
2GB RAM
17' TFT WXGA (widescreen display, 16:10 Format)
Fujitsu Siemens

Is the game going to be like Las Vegas in the Graphic Card i.e. 3.0 Shader ONLY
or can use both 2.0 and 3.0 Shader
I can play Unreal tournament 3 in (medium settings) and COD4 (med-high settings)
but I can not play Las Vegas because is not compatible with 2.0 Shader.

Also Ubisoft is going to release any DEMO or does not care for the PC sales
and follow the same tactic as in Ghost Recon 2 etc

Thanks

Jade_Samurai
03-05-2008, 12:57 AM
as far as we know there will be no demo, im not sure about your laptop though, i have a wierd feeling AC is only going to be shader 3.0 or above, but i could be wrong, it will probably have 4.0 support.

the key for your system will be if your CPU is duel core or not, if not then i would say no, but if its duel core, then maybe and i would give it a shot...

but other then that im not too sure

ApiariusV
03-05-2008, 01:14 AM
Jade_Samurai
Thanks for your response http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

My CPU according with the system information says that is duel core....can you explain me why this is important if it is easy, because I always though that the graphic card is the key to play a game.

About the 3.0 Shader or above
I check the game specs also here
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest
well I pass in everything but in the graphic card
says that :

Video RAM: Required - 256 MB , You have - 512.0 MB
Video Card 3D Acceleration: Required - Yes , You have - Yes
Video HW Transform & Lighting: Required - Yes , You have - Yes
Vertex Shader Ver.: Required - 3.0 , You have - 2.0
Pixel Shader Ver.: Required - 3.0 , You have - 2.0

thats why I asked....I do not understand if I can play it or not...

Thanks again

caswallawn_2k7
03-05-2008, 05:49 AM
shader 3.0 uses differant programing methods to 2.0 so you wont be able to play it.

lokey69666
03-05-2008, 06:19 AM
okay, so i've just seen the system requirements for this kick *** game, i think that it's fair spec. if you've seen the Xbox version, it's so shiney, this is about right.
my computer should run this just fine.

dual core, baby. 8500GT graphics card. 2GB ddr2 ram.

caswallawn_2k7
03-05-2008, 06:58 AM
Originally posted by lokey69666:
okay, so i've just seen the system requirements for this kick *** game, i think that it's fair spec. if you've seen the Xbox version, it's so shiney, this is about right.
my computer should run this just fine.

dual core, baby. 8500GT graphics card. 2GB ddr2 ram.

I wouldnt get your hopes up about getting high graphics as the 8500 is only about the same as a 7600.

Neverlord
03-05-2008, 07:00 AM
Sorry if I'm writing not in a right place, but i need help in Assassin's Creed.(+sorry for my English it's not as good as i want to))I've got a problem in a place when Altair should come to Jerusalim(in first time), when i come to place when new area shoud load, the game crash down or I appear on a loading zone but nothing is loading, right now I'm standing there for 30minutes already, and cant find way out, please if you know what should I do write on nvbox@inbox.ru(because i'm not shure if i found where i wrote this)

caswallawn_2k7
03-05-2008, 07:02 AM
Originally posted by Neverlord:
Sorry if I'm writing not in a right place, but i need help in Assassin's Creed.(+sorry for my English it's not as good as i want to))I've got a problem in a place when Altair should come to Jerusalim(in first time), when i come to place when new area shoud load, the game crash down or I appear on a loading zone but nothing is loading, right now I'm standing there for 30minutes already, and cant find way out, please if you know what should I do write on nvbox@inbox.ru(because i'm not shure if i found where i wrote this)

your using a pirate copy and the pirate copy is broke if you want to fix it wait the month then buy the game.

moqqy
03-05-2008, 07:42 AM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by lokey69666:
okay, so i've just seen the system requirements for this kick *** game, i think that it's fair spec. if you've seen the Xbox version, it's so shiney, this is about right.
my computer should run this just fine.

dual core, baby. 8500GT graphics card. 2GB ddr2 ram.

I wouldnt get your hopes up about getting high graphics as the 8500 is only about the same as a 7600. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yahh, if even as good as the 7600! He'll probably get low-med!

thesnaky
03-05-2008, 05:02 PM
Hey, can anyone tell me if my processor will survive to Assassin's Creed?

Processor: Intel Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz (2 CPUs), ~1.8GHz

All my other components can take it easily but Im not sure about my processor...

Thank you for your answers! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Neverlord
03-05-2008, 06:12 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Neverlord:
Sorry if I'm writing not in a right place, but i need help in Assassin's Creed.(+sorry for my English it's not as good as i want to))I've got a problem in a place when Altair should come to Jerusalim(in first time), when i come to place when new area shoud load, the game crash down or I appear on a loading zone but nothing is loading, right now I'm standing there for 30minutes already, and cant find way out, please if you know what should I do write on nvbox@inbox.ru(because i'm not shure if i found where i wrote this)

your using a pirate copy and the pirate copy is broke if you want to fix it wait the month then buy the game. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

I don't use pirats copy's at all, I've bought a licension game,(i heard somewhere that it's cpming on 29th marh, but a few days ago i so licension copy by one of our localisators(not pirats))and have problem there when a called to tech support of them they send me to ubi. so i've got no idea what is that all

BTOG46
03-05-2008, 06:25 PM
Please don't expect us to believe you, the leaked version that hit the torrents on the 29th of February has the Jerusalem crash.
The game hasn't even shipped yet, so you couldn't possibly have bought a licensed version for the PC.
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

caswallawn_2k7
03-05-2008, 06:43 PM
to be honest the people trying to claim they have a legal copy is starting to get old now.

Jade_Samurai
03-05-2008, 10:16 PM
you cant be too hard on them, some may actually believe they have a genuine copy

I mean, its a bit sus that such a new game is 'share ware' AND being sold in markets all at the same time when its so very popular and clearly outstanding and superb..

but some may think they have a genuine copy and we need to help them, i mean how often when you buy DVD's in china are they going to be real, i mean, i dont care what they say to me in the shop in the back alley next to the drug dealers, i dont think they are real and probably arnt, but for 10 cents anything is real!!!!

jk for legal ramifications, seriously ive never been to china http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif

v00d00m4n
03-06-2008, 01:21 AM
Ive tested russian beta version of Assassin`s Creed...
The PC version better then console versions (visually but i didnt noticed about any changes in gameplay and AI behavior, except i never seen "Npc having sex with wall" and "Screwed horse" bugs from PS3\360 version on PC) so its better in all cases, except few things that r really disappointing:

1) Well its pretty bad optimised, as a experienced tech tester i can say that such game can run 20% faster.
DX 10 and DX 9 version doesnt have noticeable difference... the difference should be in performance in theory unified shader architecture in DX10 should give performance gain, but we all know that DX9 rendering in XP pretty faster then, DX9 and DX10 rendering in Vista. So untill DX10 will be used for noticeable visual improvements and really advanced shaders, there is no point in it.
But anyway it can run on my laptop bought in 2006 (laging, best my laptop can do in AC is 800x450).

2) Really disappointing that game doesnt support XINPUT api, so there is no native support for Xbox 360 controller. Its lie that GAME SUPPORT XBOX 360 controller.
360 controller just semi-supported as generic DINPUT controller (via XINPUT-DINPUT wrapper implemented in Xbox 360 controller driver).
What i mean by semi-support?

Well game cannot use gamepad Axes as action buttons (this true for every gamepad, so if u have any other gamepad with analogue triggers u will not able to use them).

Another bad thing again about Triggers(Trigger isnt button its Axis), if u maping analogue trigger to some action, game uses full range of trigger or input instead of -+ 50% range, whats bad in that thing? Xbox 360 controller have 2 separate analogue triggers, but both of them just 50% of 1 full axis Z range, (one trigger in positive and another in negative range of axis Z).
When im binding LEFT trigger (axis Z\131) to LockONTarget\Low standing (just like in XBOX 360), and then trying to bind High standing on Right trigger...
...oops the game cleaning bindings of Low Standing and binding same Axis Z\131 on High standing. I can Use only one trigger of two, game engine doesnt make difference and cannot recognise positive or negative range of axis, just Full axis. But wait i cannot use triggers even after that!!!
I noticed that game just pretending that Additional Axis maped but when im pressing trigger in game (outside of settings) there is no reaction just like the trigger was not mapped.
But its good that the game not like others support all dinput devices (i hate when game just work with 360 controller and don have idea about 100 dinput device), but bad that support have such limitations... same limitations as they was present in POP, TNMT and other Jade engine games, looks like its one more rudiment from Jade engine (predecessor of <span class="ev_code_RED">Scimitar engine</span> which powering Assasins creed, and possibly SC:Conviction or Prince of Persia 4).
XINPUT Force feedback also not supported...
So i decide to play AC with another Gamepad - Logitech Rumblepad 2 wich r already in list of default premaped gamepads but...

here is default layout and all predefined devices (but any dinput device with 12 buttons supported, problems with 10 button gamepad and 2 triggers)

[KeyboardMouse2]
VendorID=1
ProductID=1
Button1=57
Button2=256
Button3=18
Button4=42
PadUp=3
PadRight=4
PadDown=5
PadLeft=2
Select=15
Start=1
ShoulderLeft1=33
ShoulderLeft2=16
ShoulderRight1=257
ShoulderRight2=-1
StickLeft=-1
StickRight=46
LeftStickUp=17
LeftStickDown=31
LeftStickLeft=30
LeftStickRight=32
RightStickUp=200
RightStickDown=208
RightStickLeft=203
RightStickRight=205
CameraActivator=29
[KeyboardMouse5]
VendorID=2
ProductID=2
Button1=259
Button2=256
Button3=18
Button4=260
PadUp=3
PadRight=4
PadDown=5
PadLeft=2
Select=15
Start=1
ShoulderLeft1=33
ShoulderLeft2=16
ShoulderRight1=257
ShoulderRight2=7
StickLeft=10
StickRight=46
LeftStickUp=17
LeftStickDown=31
LeftStickLeft=30
LeftStickRight=32
RightStickUp=200
RightStickDown=208
RightStickLeft=203
RightStickRight=205
CameraActivator=258
[Keyboard]
VendorID=3
ProductID=3
Button1=76
Button2=72
Button3=73
Button4=77
PadUp=82
PadRight=81
PadDown=80
PadLeft=79
Select=15
Start=1
ShoulderLeft1=33
ShoulderLeft2=16
ShoulderRight1=78
ShoulderRight2=7
StickLeft=10
StickRight=75
LeftStickUp=17
LeftStickDown=31
LeftStickLeft=30
LeftStickRight=32
RightStickUp=200
RightStickDown=208
RightStickLeft=203
RightStickRight=205
[KeyboardAlt]
VendorID=4
ProductID=4
Button1=57
Button2=157
Button3=16
Button4=54
PadUp=4
PadRight=3
PadDown=2
PadLeft=5
Select=15
Start=1
ShoulderLeft1=33
ShoulderLeft2=18
ShoulderRight1=42
ShoulderRight2=7
StickLeft=10
StickRight=82
LeftStickUp=17
LeftStickDown=31
LeftStickLeft=30
LeftStickRight=32
RightStickUp=200
RightStickDown=208
RightStickLeft=203
RightStickRight=205
[Mad Catz PC USB wireless game pad]
VendorID=1848
ProductID=17494
Button1=0
Button4=1
Button2=2
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft1=10
ShoulderRight1=11
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
Select=6
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=7
StickRight=9
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Saitek P990 Dual Analog Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=1035
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=9
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Thrustmaster vibrating gamepad]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=45856
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=5
ShoulderRight2=7
ShoulderLeft1=8
ShoulderRight1=9
Select=4
Start=6
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Thrustmaster analog gamepad]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=45845
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=5
ShoulderRight2=7
ShoulderLeft1=8
ShoulderRight1=9
Select=4
Start=6
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Logitech RumblePad 2 USB]
VendorID=1133
ProductID=49688
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=134
RightStickDown=134
RightStickLeft=131
RightStickRight=131
[2 in 1 DT]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=0
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Cyborg Force Rumble Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=65292
Button1=2
Button2=0
Button3=1
Button4=3
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
Select=10
Start=4
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderLeft2=5
ShoulderRight1=7
ShoulderRight2=131
StickLeft=8
StickRight=9
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Saitek P2500 Rumble Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=65292
Button1=2
Button4=3
Button2=0
Button3=1
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=11
Start=10
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=8
StickRight=9
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Rechargeable DT 2 in 1]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=0
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Thrustmaster vibrating Upad]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=0
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=66
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Nostromo n45 Dual Analog Gamepad]
VendorID=1293
ProductID=0
Button1=0
Button4=1
Button2=2
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=10
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=12
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[P880]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=265
Button1=2
Button2=0
Button3=1
Button4=3
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderLeft2=5
ShoulderRight1=7
ShoulderRight2=10
Select=10
Start=4
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=8
StickRight=9
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[T Mini]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=0
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Logitech Dual Action]
VendorID=1133
ProductID=49686
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=134
RightStickDown=134
RightStickLeft=131
RightStickRight=131
[Mad Catz Game Controller]
VendorID=1848
ProductID=17446
Button1=0
Button4=1
Button2=2
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=10
ShoulderRight1=11
Select=6
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=7
StickRight=9
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Saitek P2600 Rumble Force Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=24333
Button1=1
Button2=0
Button3=3
Button4=2
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
Select=9
Start=8
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight1=7
ShoulderRight2=11
StickLeft=10
StickRight=5
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Saitek P2600 Rumble Force Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=65293
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=11
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=9
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=5
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Wireless DT]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=45857
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Logitech Cordless RumblePad 2]
VendorID=1133
ProductID=49689
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=134
RightStickDown=134
RightStickLeft=131
RightStickRight=131
[WingMan Cordless Gamepad]
VendorID=1133
ProductID=0
Button1=0
Button4=1
Button2=3
Button3=4
ShoulderLeft2=6
ShoulderRight2=7
ShoulderLeft1=9
ShoulderRight1=10
Select=8
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=65
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=5
StickRight=2
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[WingMan RumblePad]
VendorID=1133
ProductID=49674
Button1=0
Button4=1
Button2=3
Button3=4
ShoulderLeft2=5
ShoulderRight2=2
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=-1
StickRight=-1
LeftStickUp=131
LeftStickDown=131
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=131
RightStickRight=131
[Saitek P2900 Wireless Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=1036
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=9
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Firestorm Wireless Gamepad]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=45834
Button1=0
Button4=2
Button2=1
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=6
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=8
Start=9
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Saitek P3000 RF Game-Pad]
VendorID=1699
ProductID=0
Button1=1
Button4=2
Button2=0
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight2=5
ShoulderLeft1=6
ShoulderRight1=7
Select=9
Start=8
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=131
RightStickDown=131
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[XBCD XBox Gamepad] ; lol who uses these unofficial drivers which screwing up all the buttons?
VendorID=2341
ProductID=5768
Button1=0
Button4=1
Button2=2
Button3=3
ShoulderLeft2=5
ShoulderRight2=4
ShoulderLeft1=10
ShoulderRight1=11
Select=7
Start=6
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
StickLeft=8
StickRight=9
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=133
RightStickDown=133
RightStickLeft=132
RightStickRight=132
[Thrustmaster dual analog 3.2]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=45845
Button1=0
Button2=1
Button3=3
Button4=2
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
Select=8
Start=9
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight1=7
ShoulderRight2=6
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
[Thrustmaster DT Rumble]
VendorID=1103
ProductID=45856
Button1=0
Button2=1
Button3=3
Button4=2
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
Select=8
Start=9
ShoulderLeft1=5
ShoulderLeft2=4
ShoulderRight1=7
ShoulderRight2=6
StickLeft=10
StickRight=11
LeftStickUp=130
LeftStickDown=130
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=135
RightStickDown=135
RightStickLeft=134
RightStickRight=134
;this is XUSB is 360 mapping which i add myself so 360 gamepad not even predefined.
[XUSB Gamepad (Controller)]
VendorID=
ProductID=
Button1=0
Button2=2
Button3=3
Button4=1
PadUp=64
PadRight=65
PadDown=66
PadLeft=67
Select=6
Start=7
ShoulderLeft1=4
ShoulderLeft2=8 ;as u c i have no choice but map these not on Trigger but on MiniSticks)
ShoulderRight1=5
ShoulderRight2=9 ;same here
StickLeft=8 ;strange why there is no conflict with ShoulderLeft2
StickRight=9 ;same here
LeftStickUp=130 ; X axis but how the
LeftStickDown=130 ; game differ +130 and -130?
LeftStickLeft=129
LeftStickRight=129
RightStickUp=133
RightStickDown=133
RightStickLeft=132
RightStickRight=132

3) Another disappointing thing there is no FORCEFEEDBACK\RUMBLEFORCE at all! No DINPUT no XINPUT, no Rubmeforce on any gamepad!

So i hope that all those issues will be fixed before final release at 28 march.
Also i really DOESNT LIKE localisation created for russia by akella,
There r no so good voice actors then in original, Same actor gave his\her voices for many characters and NPS... so All guards Have same voices, all NPC sound like they all was voiced by one person http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif.
And the last bad thing that VOICES of NPCS was highly compressed or recorded with poor quality they sounds like 11khz 8 bit recorded from audio cassette(((
I really hope that UBISOFT will allow and force Akella to include Original English language (Master disk as i know will be build by UBI without starforce) and to force them use same protection as in original(hope not star force or securom, safedisk is ok, akkella loves to starforce everyhting, there is nothing bad in it but it will kill 10% of performance and game will be unplayable on my pc) in russian release... otherwise i will not spend money on such bad russian localisation.
Waiting for 28 march for final verdict.

thesnaky
03-06-2008, 11:47 AM
Can someone answer my question plz?

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

FYTJ
03-06-2008, 12:41 PM
OK, I just ordered a new computer cause it has been on my "to-do list" for over a year now. So this is what it looks like:
Intel Core 2 Duo 3.16GHz
4096 Mo RAM
Radeon HD 2600 256 Mo
I know the graphics card could be better but hey, it's DELL, you don't have much of a choice... Besides, the HD 2600 still beats the X1600 XT at tests (http://www.clubic.com/article-75676-6-amd-ati-radeon-hd-2600-xt-hd-2400-xt.html) and let's not forget that the X1600 is the recommended card.
I'm not hoping for too much performance, though. Actually I only hope to be able to run it decently on low. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/shady.gif
I'll probably be upgrading later anyway(my wallet needs to recuperate first, being a student, it could take some time http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif ). Maybe to a HD 3850? What do you think?

ltolman
03-06-2008, 08:09 PM
Thesnaky here is your answer

You got to break it down:

Processor: Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D

or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 3800+

(Intel Core® 2 Duo 2.2 GHz


or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or better recommended)



So you said your CPU is Intel Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz (2 CPUs), ~1.8GHz


Now you didnt say it was a dual core; you just said 2 CPUs therefore since your CPU isnt labled a dual core you have to go by the first statement:



Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D


You have 1.8gig

It could run but I am not too sure how well.

Everyone always says, try running "Will Assassins Creed run on my PC" test; best place to get it, is go to www.yougamers.com (http://www.yougamers.com) top banner should be about AC and "will it run on my PC"

Jade_Samurai
03-06-2008, 11:45 PM
it even detected that my cpu was oced from 3.6 to 4.4!!! AWESOME lol

pietjevlip
03-07-2008, 05:56 AM
Good news... The only problem on reccomended test is this:

Your display card fails the following requirements:
"¢ 512MB memory, you have 256MB

If that's all... I was planning to update that someday anyway...

Also, i did read something Here (http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/856/856534p1.html) about when running the game in Vista, DX10 would be faster then DX9, because of different API. DX9 on XP or DX10 on Vista isn't gonna make a difference in speed... (in graphics it does http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif)

v00d00m4n
03-07-2008, 06:47 AM
Actualy i have damn X1600 and this card is realy slow for Assasin Creed, just as all other X1*** ATI cards. X2 cards run smoother.
Geforces of 6 generation (6600 6800) and even of 7 generation (exept high end 7800 that acting not so slow) also acting slow in AC.
Its all about Single cards... never tested AC on Double SLI or Crossfire cards, but for sure performance will be atleast 20% greater then on 1 same single video card.
So u know im talking about All settings turned to maximum and with no antialising.
If u will turn off shadows, set lod to min, turn post process and other effects off then Assasin creed can run on X1600 with good performance and it will look like Prince of persia 3))
But anyway why there are no comments on my HUGE post 2 pages ago? anyone?

BTOG46
03-07-2008, 06:57 AM
Partly because it was a huge post, but mainly because you're breaking the terms of use on the Ubi forums by discussing a pirated version of an as yet un-released PC version of the game.............. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

v00d00m4n
03-07-2008, 08:27 AM
Actually if u will read carefully my post u will be noticed about that: i am technical tester of QA of Russian publisher and i was testing the game, and not was playing pirated version)
How do u think i was able to test game on so many hardware configurations i mentioned above???
Or do u think it just usual for everyone to have near 10 middle end and high end PCs?))
<span class="ev_code_RED">There is no violation of terms of use!!!</span><span class="ev_code_GREEN">Just be careful before blaming peoples like that!!!
JUST READ CAREFUL AND THINK BETTER!!!</span>
Anyway i dislike the politics of Akella, they not caring about tech bugs, (lol localisation bugs also seems not worrying 2 much Akella managers) so after game was leaked (unplayable and corrupted version - thats just waste of traffic and time) and everyone tried it i decide to talk here about critical disadvantages of game i found earlier then this leakage happened!!! Just to attract some attention of UBI to these aspects of game before it will be released.

BTOG46
03-07-2008, 09:00 AM
If you really are a tester, then you're in breach of the NDA by publishing all those controls, which at this stage, are only of use to downloaders, and I find your claim to be working as a tester for the Russian version interesting in view of the fact that the Russian version on the torrents appears to be a working version, unlike the bugged English version.
In your original post, or your second one, at no time did you say you were a "technical tester of QA of Russian publisher" you merely said you had tested the Russian beta version.
As for the "10 middle end and high end PCs that's the first time you've mentioned that, and anyway, I myself have 6 PC's (non I would call high end though).
If you were testing as part of your job, I apologise, but, if you were a beta tester, as I've previously said in this post, you're in breach of the Non Disclosure Agreement. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

FYTJ
03-07-2008, 10:48 AM
Originally posted by pietjevlip:
Good news... The only problem on reccomended test is this:

Your display card fails the following requirements:
"¢ 512MB memory, you have 256MB

See, that's what I don't understand!
System requirement labs says 256. Pages that published the specs shortly after the FIRST specs were published by Ubisoft(there have been two in total) say 512 and Ubisoft doesn't say anything. What the heck are we supposed to believe?

thesnaky
03-07-2008, 02:18 PM
Originally posted by ltolman:
Thesnaky here is your answer

You got to break it down:

Processor: Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D

or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 3800+

(Intel Core® 2 Duo 2.2 GHz


or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or better recommended)



So you said your CPU is Intel Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz (2 CPUs), ~1.8GHz


Now you didnt say it was a dual core; you just said 2 CPUs therefore since your CPU isnt labled a dual core you have to go by the first statement:



Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D


You have 1.8gig

It could run but I am not too sure how well.

Everyone always says, try running "Will Assassins Creed run on my PC" test; best place to get it, is go to www.yougamers.com (http://www.yougamers.com) top banner should be about AC and "will it run on my PC"

Ton answer your question, you asked me if it was a dual core. I would answer yes, because 2 CPU means 2 processor, and Ive the Core 2 Duo sticker on my computer. So I think I would be able to run it, just wanted a confirmation. The test I made on Yougamer and systemrequirmentlab told me I could run it easily, pretty close to the recommended setting, only my processor doesnt pass here, on recommended settings, but it pass easily on minimum setting.

Jade_Samurai
03-07-2008, 03:29 PM
For me, requirements lab says 'NO, YOUR MACHINE SUCKS, GET A BETTER CPU'
and yougamer is nice and says 'of course we can see its only single core 3.6 p4... but look, you've taken all that time and love to oc it to 4.4, aren't you a sweaty, and that, means you are ruffly the same in raw performance as the minimum'
Gee!! thanks yougamer, your my hero!!

Core 2 Duo doesn't mean fast 'Core 2 Extreme' means fast, but as can be seen from dell, selling machines as 'state of the art' with Core 2 Duo 1.8 ghz, as compared to many, MANY other cpu's they are no where near the same performance.

My recommendation is to never buy a machine from dell if your going to want to upgrade or game on it later, for office use, yeah why not - they are good value, but asking your local PC store or something to build you a machine will probably mean you get a MUCH faster machine, and you probably would pay less then if you got the equivalent machine from dell.
Only buy Dell monitors, they are very good value and performance not that shabby either (i have a Dell monitor 22" ultrasharp, its very nice) my initial move from a 17" monitor to the 22" was amazing... but now i find myself wanting something EVEN BIGGER 24" 30".... maybe the 30" with Tri-Sli (not to much a fan of ATI, sadly even if they outperform nVidia, ill still find myself moving towards nVidia cards... just Green and black looks SO MUCH BETTER!!! lol)

caswallawn_2k7
03-07-2008, 04:36 PM
Originally posted by BTOG46:
If you really are a tester, then you're in breach of the NDA by publishing all those controls, which at this stage, are only of use to downloaders, and I find your claim to be working as a tester for the Russian version interesting in view of the fact that the Russian version on the torrents appears to be a working version, unlike the bugged English version.
In your original post, or your second one, at no time did you say you were a "technical tester of QA of Russian publisher" you merely said you had tested the Russian beta version.
As for the "10 middle end and high end PCs that's the first time you've mentioned that, and anyway, I myself have 6 PC's (non I would call high end though).
If you were testing as part of your job, I apologise, but, if you were a beta tester, as I've previously said in this post, you're in breach of the Non Disclosure Agreement. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
Btog ignore him he is talking bull any1 who has done beta testing on games will tell you there are private forums to ask for support as it also allows the devs to see bugs. so by the fact he is posting here he is just full of it.

FYTJ
03-07-2008, 05:32 PM
Originally posted by Jade_Samurai:
For me, requirements lab says 'NO, YOUR MACHINE SUCKS, GET A BETTER CPU'
and yougamer is nice and says 'of course we can see its only single core 3.6 p4... but look, you've taken all that time and love to oc it to 4.4, aren't you a sweaty, and that, means you are ruffly the same in raw performance as the minimum'
Gee!! thanks yougamer, your my hero!!

Core 2 Duo doesn't mean fast 'Core 2 Extreme' means fast, but as can be seen from dell, selling machines as 'state of the art' with Core 2 Duo 1.8 ghz, as compared to many, MANY other cpu's they are no where near the same performance.

My recommendation is to never buy a machine from dell if your going to want to upgrade or game on it later, for office use, yeah why not - they are good value, but asking your local PC store or something to build you a machine will probably mean you get a MUCH faster machine, and you probably would pay less then if you got the equivalent machine from dell.
Only buy Dell monitors, they are very good value and performance not that shabby either (i have a Dell monitor 22" ultrasharp, its very nice) my initial move from a 17" monitor to the 22" was amazing... but now i find myself wanting something EVEN BIGGER 24" 30".... maybe the 30" with Tri-Sli (not to much a fan of ATI, sadly even if they outperform nVidia, ill still find myself moving towards nVidia cards... just Green and black looks SO MUCH BETTER!!! lol)
Well, the nice thing with dell is that nobody forces you to take a 1.8 GHz cpu. Don't forget that you can customize your machine. This is the second computer I order from dell and I'm pretty confident about it since so far they have always lived up to the expectations I and other dell users I know had. And getting a similar computer at my local pc store would've cost me 200 euros more(that's 300 hundred dollars)so I'm pretty satisfied. Local pc stores where you live seem to suck less than local pc stores where I live I guess. What you definitely shouldn't do is order a computer from dell without customizing it(or at least having a look at the options), that's for sure. But actually they're pretty good if you're an occasional player like I am.

v00d00m4n
03-08-2008, 02:17 AM
BTOG46 Omg man are u serious about violation of "Non Disclosure Agreement" after game was leaked? Do u think keeping silence is reasonable while 100 000 gamers already playing the game and know everything about it? Read again my previous post, i said that reason why i decide to speak about this problems here is that leakage, it makes not sence to keep silence while i can give important information to directly 2 UBI so they can fix it.
7 PC home? Why do u need so many, its weird?

caswallawn_2k7
U dont have any idea how the things working, 1st of all testers not using FORUMS! There several bug tracking systems for such job.
Here we using "Test tracker pro" client (sometime web interface of TTP, while testing happening in "Clean" OS without any 3d party software).
2nd) russian testers dont have primary contact with vendors\original publishers, we submiting bug reports in russian language to our russian localisation team, bugreporst about localisation only and we not making any bugreports about gameplay, we not that main testing group from UBI, only localisation managers here collecting most critical bugs that cannot be fixed by localisation team (but these bugs related to localisation) and then sending them UBI. After fixes from both side manager giving to QA manager DVD with new build and then our QA manager givin us tasks and time limit to finish that task, we testing new build again and again and only contacting with out internal Localisation team, NOT WITH UBI!!
So thats the reason im posting here, officially im and Russian publisher not responsible for bugs in game, only things related to localisation is under our response.
Another reason why im not asking our manager to send my "NOt related to localisation bugreports" its because if this bug will posted in internal resources there is a big chance it never will be fixed (im tired of 100+ answers like "this is not localisation related bug" or "this is not critical bug and will not be fixed"), . Every company can pretend that development team wasnt noticed about some bugs before release, so sometime its good to pay public attention on some bugs before its to late. In fact i said before i dont like Akella policy about localisations, managers trying to save more money and time for their lazy asses instead of making Excellent quality russian localisations, i dont respect company im working at. Never had any respect to Akella, I got that job for one purpose to help improve final quality of good products that Akella usualy screwed up (they screwed Prince of Persia WW and TT), im trying to work as horse but all my tries useless with such managers and other lazy careless co-workers, most of them hate games. Anyway Im already decide for myself to move into another bigger company that carrying about quality.


caswallawn_2k7 U got it? Im forgiving u for that insult, and next time if dont have idea and real arguments about topic u trying to speak (how the things happen here in DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT\DIGITAL GAMING INDUSTRY)then just shutup and dont bulls**t around, dont show peoples that u are really nothing but rude snob (snob is man who acting like he have idea what he talking about but really he is just wannabe who dont know anythign).
Just say thx to me for that fact in really care about game, for that fact that im not here to insult peoples (Like u do) but to help improve Assasin`s creed!

Bad_Boy19801980
03-08-2008, 03:27 AM
Originally posted by kazzoo:
Hi guys! Here are the official technical requirements for Assassin's Creed PC http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

System Requirements (List both minimum and reccommended):


Supported OS: Windows® XP/Windows Vista® (only) This product does not support Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP x64/Vista x64

Processor: Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 3800+ (Intel Core® 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or better recommended)

RAM: 1 GB Windows Xp / 2 GB Windows Vista

Video Card: 256 MB DirectX® 10.0–compliant video card or DirectX 9.0–compliant card with Shader Model 3.0 or higher (see supported list)*

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0 or 10.0–compliant sound card (5.1 sound card recommended)

DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0 or10.0 libraries (included on disc)

DVD-ROM: DVD-ROM dual-layer drive

Hard Drive Space: 8 GB

Peripherals Supported: Keyboard, mouse, optional controller (Xbox 360® Controller for Windows recommended)

Supported Video Cards at Time of Release: ATI® RADEON® X1600*/1650*-1950/HD 2000/3000 series NVIDIA GeForce® 6800*/7/8/9 series

*PCI Express only supported


Laptop versions of these cards may work but are NOT supported. These chipsets are the only ones that will run this game. For the most up-to-date minimum requirement listings, please visit the FAQ for this game on our support website at: http://support.ubi.com. (http://support.ubi.com)


NOTICE: This game contains technology intended to prevent copying that may conflict with some disc and virtual drives.


What protection are you using to stop the copying? of the game?

If you even think of using Starforce your gonna miss out on alot of sales, Most people dont even install games that have Starforce protection, Just a heads up

davo81
03-08-2008, 03:44 AM
Originally posted by Bad_Boy19801980:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by kazzoo:
Hi guys! Here are the official technical requirements for Assassin's Creed PC http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

System Requirements (List both minimum and reccommended):


Supported OS: Windows® XP/Windows Vista® (only) This product does not support Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP x64/Vista x64

Processor: Dual core processor 2.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® D or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 3800+ (Intel Core® 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or better recommended)

RAM: 1 GB Windows Xp / 2 GB Windows Vista

Video Card: 256 MB DirectX® 10.0–compliant video card or DirectX 9.0–compliant card with Shader Model 3.0 or higher (see supported list)*

Sound Card: DirectX 9.0 or 10.0–compliant sound card (5.1 sound card recommended)

DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0 or10.0 libraries (included on disc)

DVD-ROM: DVD-ROM dual-layer drive

Hard Drive Space: 8 GB

Peripherals Supported: Keyboard, mouse, optional controller (Xbox 360® Controller for Windows recommended)

Supported Video Cards at Time of Release: ATI® RADEON® X1600*/1650*-1950/HD 2000/3000 series NVIDIA GeForce® 6800*/7/8/9 series

*PCI Express only supported


Laptop versions of these cards may work but are NOT supported. These chipsets are the only ones that will run this game. For the most up-to-date minimum requirement listings, please visit the FAQ for this game on our support website at: http://support.ubi.com. (http://support.ubi.com)


NOTICE: This game contains technology intended to prevent copying that may conflict with some disc and virtual drives.


What protection are you using to stop the copying? of the game?

If you even think of using Starforce your gonna miss out on alot of sales, Most people dont even install games that have Starforce protection, Just a heads up </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

It uses SecuROM 7.3. I had trouble with crysis (as it uses SecuROM and SafeDISC) i had to take drastic measures to get crysis working.

caswallawn_2k7
03-08-2008, 07:56 AM
to be honest voodoo you can belive what you want the fact having 2 legal hard copies of vista pre releases sitting infront of me i think i should know how beta programs work. the fact is if you are having a problem with a beta program the only place you will get help is on a beta forum and every company does them not to do one would mean the company is realy cutting corners on testing. but if you fell by pretending to be in a beta makes it ok to pirate a game that is up to you.

Jade_Samurai
03-08-2008, 06:15 PM
COME ON! he was just letting us - the PC fan base, know about a possible control mapping issue. I dont see where these accusations of piracy and lies come from caswallawn, like... hes being helpful and letting us know there may be an issue with the game that may - or may not be resolved.

Im not entering a fight - im mearly saying that is is PC REQUIREMENTS thread and not 'THAT GUY IS PIRATING ASSASSINS CREED AND IS LYING ABOUT IT BECAUSE HE IS A LIER AND A THIEF' thread

in other news:

I had no issue with Crysis and SecuROM and SafeDISC, i dont like starforce, but i wont go as far as not installing a program i like just because it uses starforce copy pretection. Cant wait now, ive had AC for PC pre-orderd as soon as the console version was available for pre-order!

Pirax
03-09-2008, 10:50 AM
Can someone tell me why Windows XP x64 is not supported? Or is there any way to bypass it? Im using this platform and I would like to know if there is any way to play that game, before I buy it...

caswallawn_2k7
03-09-2008, 10:55 AM
I never noticed it said the 64bit versions arnt supported but that brings up the question why force dual core when all the dual cores are 64 bit and get alot more power running under it.

this will probly work on a 64bit system if it doesnt ubisoft has made a massive mistake as 64 bit systems are getting quite common now.

Pirax
03-09-2008, 10:59 AM
Well...

Supported OS: Windows® XP/Windows Vista® (only) This product does not support Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP x64/Vista x64

thesnaky
03-09-2008, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I never noticed it said the 64bit versions arnt supported but that brings up the question why force dual core when all the dual cores are 64 bit and get alot more power running under it.

this will probly work on a 64bit system if it doesnt ubisoft has made a massive mistake as 64 bit systems are getting quite common now.

WTF?! Ive a dual core and I also have 32 bit Vista...

caswallawn_2k7
03-09-2008, 05:57 PM
Originally posted by thesnaky:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I never noticed it said the 64bit versions arnt supported but that brings up the question why force dual core when all the dual cores are 64 bit and get alot more power running under it.

this will probly work on a 64bit system if it doesnt ubisoft has made a massive mistake as 64 bit systems are getting quite common now.

WTF?! Ive a dual core and I also have 32 bit Vista... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I never said you couldnt run dual core under a 32 bit os i belive i said there was big differance in power if you ran it under a 64bit os as the dual cores are native to 64bit.

Nameace
03-11-2008, 05:31 PM
Hi guys im in need of help and pls answer me if i can run this imba game.I would really appriciate your help Thank you.

My Machine:
7600GtorGTS i dont know (agp)
1g ram
190giga hard....
2.70 CPU but its not Duel Core (and i heared i need duel core, but CPU can't stop you from playing the game it will slow it in my certain knowledge....) Please Help Me:P Ty a lot all

caswallawn_2k7
03-11-2008, 06:01 PM
A cpu can stop you playing a game as when it tries to send instructions to the second core your pc will be glad its running windows as all it can do is chuck the instructions for the second core out of the window. also if your graphics card is apg it wont work either so you need atleast to upgrade to a new cpu if you even want any hope of the game running. would also advise more ram.

davo81
03-12-2008, 04:22 AM
Originally posted by Nameace:
Hi guys im in need of help and pls answer me if i can run this imba game.I would really appriciate your help Thank you.

My Machine:
7600GtorGTS i dont know (agp)
1g ram
190giga hard....
2.70 CPU but its not Duel Core (and i heared i need duel core, but CPU can't stop you from playing the game it will slow it in my certain knowledge....) Please Help Me:P Ty a lot all

Your really scraping on the ram..I'd suggest >2GB

Your video card will choke to death trying to play it...

And you won't be able to play it with a single core cpu. A dual core cpu is required to actually process and load the game AI, Physics and so on.. the code in the game is only written for multicore CPU's so you've got a bit of upgrading to do there or mabye build a new PC or buy a 360 perhaps?

Nameace
03-12-2008, 04:25 AM
Hmmmmm
Look at this guys PC

ok my pc has
windows Xp Home Premium
Intel(R)Core(TM)2 CPU
T5600 @ 1.83 GHz
1GB Ram
Hard Disk is 107 GB
7300 Geforce card

And mine its better only his CPU is i mean
And plus you said that AGP works just fine
it doesnt work on older series such as 1650 ,1600 ati.... and from 7300 over you said it works .... i dont understand you man , Maybe i am wrong but thats what you Wrote in page 3 ...
Btw i know my CPU sucks im trying to get a new one i have AMD ATHLON And its DDR1 ,and im not sure i can upgrade or i am mistake tell me pls bye and ty

Tok3n_ac
03-12-2008, 05:41 AM
http://i29.tinypic.com/2uswnjp.jpg

So with this processor i won't be able to play assassins creed on the pc?
I'm also getting 2x2gb ram.

FYTJ
03-12-2008, 03:49 PM
Just got my new computer. And guess what?
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1603/suckerszd6.jpg
Mwahahahahahaaaaa!

davo81
03-12-2008, 05:29 PM
Originally posted by FYTJ:
Just got my new computer. And guess what?
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1603/suckerszd6.jpg
Mwahahahahahaaaaa!

Still you wont be able to play on maximum settings..

@ Tok3n_ac

4gb of ram is plenty..but what video card do you have? (go to Bleedscherm or display http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_razz.gif)

Also that processor wont cut it.

FYTJ
03-12-2008, 05:48 PM
Originally posted by davo81:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by FYTJ:
Just got my new computer. And guess what?
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1603/suckerszd6.jpg
Mwahahahahahaaaaa!

Still you wont be able to play on maximum settings..
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's true but consedering most people will barely be able to play it on minimum I'm quite satisfied if I can play on recommended...

caswallawn_2k7
03-12-2008, 05:52 PM
Originally posted by FYTJ:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by davo81:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by FYTJ:
Just got my new computer. And guess what?
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1603/suckerszd6.jpg
Mwahahahahahaaaaa!

Still you wont be able to play on maximum settings..
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's true but consedering most people will barely be able to play it on minimum I'm quite satisfied if I can play on recommended... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

once you get past the recommended on there i think it goes a bit funky as mine was nearly that far across and i wouldnt exactly class it as high end considering its probly about 2 year old.

Tok3n_ac
03-13-2008, 03:05 AM
@ Tok3n_ac

4gb of ram is plenty..but what video card do you have? (go to Bleedscherm or display http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_razz.gif)

Also that processor wont cut it.

Videocard is fine i have the 8800 gtx, all i need is a dual core processor now, thanks for the help http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-13-2008, 04:25 AM
present system

HIS ATI Radeon X1800GTO iceq3 turbo
Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 nForce4 Skt 939
Athlon 64 3500+ venice
2 Gig Corsair XMS ddr400

at time of release i will have this

HIS ATI Radeon HD 3870 XT ICEQ3
Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 nForce4 Skt 939
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 4800+, 2.4 GHz
4 Gig Corsair XMS ddr400

will this be ok for this game ?

peeves87
03-13-2008, 08:09 AM
An 8600 gt 256 mb, 3GB ram can max the game out silky smooth.
(Sounds unlikely, but yeah it does).
Atleast I can with minimal lag once in a while.

caswallawn_2k7
03-13-2008, 08:13 AM
Originally posted by AJ_Rimmer_Bsc:
present system

HIS ATI Radeon X1800GTO iceq3 turbo
Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 nForce4 Skt 939
Athlon 64 3500+ venice
2 Gig Corsair XMS ddr400

at time of release i will have this

HIS ATI Radeon HD 3870 XT ICEQ3
Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 nForce4 Skt 939
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 4800+, 2.4 GHz
4 Gig Corsair XMS ddr400

will this be ok for this game ?

yes that second spec should be fine but till we see how it actualy plays on a pc cant say what preformance will be like. any1 posting saying about how the game runs should be ignored as they are using a pirate copy that is early beta so it is a long way from the final version.

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-13-2008, 09:19 AM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:

yes that second spec should be fine but till we see how it actualy plays on a pc cant say what preformance will be like. any1 posting saying about how the game runs should be ignored as they are using a pirate copy that is early beta so it is a long way from the final version.

great,and after an hours searching i now realise i have to wait on the preorder to see what performance i get.

how the hell people got the pc version is what makes me wonder,was there a pc beta test i missed out on ?

BTOG46
03-13-2008, 09:23 AM
was there a pc beta test i missed out on ?
Only the usual closed beta testing that any game has, there wasn't an open beta, only a limited number of games get those, usually ones with multiplayer.

caswallawn_2k7
03-13-2008, 01:52 PM
Originally posted by BTOG46:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">was there a pc beta test i missed out on ?
Only the usual closed beta testing that any game has, there wasn't an open beta, only a limited number of games get those, usually ones with multiplayer. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
and the only people who do have the game are using a pirated copy from early testing phase so it has hundreds of errors and probly have bits missing.

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-13-2008, 02:01 PM
seems nuts to me,the stress from a shop bought game crashing once or twice is bad enough.

knickers to having a rip ver crashing all the time and making a drooling loon out of me.

just did some googling and the jerusalem thing is all over the place,theres a lot of bald teens from stress hair pulling out there http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/compsmash.gif

http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

caswallawn_2k7
03-13-2008, 02:17 PM
is alot of people banned from here for asking help with that one.

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-13-2008, 03:23 PM
theres been a few games where the devs added little touchs that would highlight if someones using a rip.

if they actually said theres little traps placed,it might keep the thieves off forums.

then again,the IQ`s of some of them means they would still hit the official forums to ask the stupidest of questions.

sometimes makes it bloody hard to check for legit bugs,i really miss laserlok and those little widgets that used to come with games,back in the days when rips were rare.

caswallawn_2k7
03-13-2008, 03:34 PM
the thing is they have been asking for support with the game since back end of feb when it was leaked even tho it still isnt out. a few even put up massive arguments saying they had it.

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-13-2008, 03:44 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
the thing is they have been asking for support with the game since back end of feb when it was leaked even tho it still isnt out. a few even put up massive arguments saying they had it.

like old condoms in alleys and dark corners,the stupid are everywhere.
i`m admin on a gamesite,and added my small worth to the game,yet even i have had pm`s asking why some "bugs" are not getting addressed.

a simple reply of "well those who bought it dont get those bugs" and hit the ban button http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif

i say bring back lenslok lens`s,lets see them duplicate those in a garden shed or dingy bedroom.

caswallawn_2k7
03-13-2008, 03:49 PM
all security is broke in time so realy there is no way to stop it just ways to slow it down.

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-13-2008, 03:49 PM
remember these ?

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/rosettahome/lenslok1.jpg

caswallawn_2k7
03-13-2008, 03:56 PM
nope but it cant be that hard to remake considering people can make contact lenses that copy a iris to pass iris scans. the fact is with the way technology is now nothing is safe for that long. its like all the gaming machine cartridges that are out there and connect to the pc. the fact is when pcb's and other goods are easy mass manufactured you can easily replicate something.

Binghas
03-13-2008, 07:06 PM
Originally posted by Stealthguy1986:
I am still wondering what could be the reason for this 'Dual Core' requirement?? Is it due to poor optimization? or ubi made some improvements in the game (like A.I. and stuff)??What do you think guys??

Dual cores should be needed for concurrency, since in actual fact on a single core, not everyting is being processed at the same time, but different time shares are given to programs which to our eye seem to be working on their own, though if you have a dual core, and use threading correctly, the game can be running different things concurrently on individual cpu.
Tried to be brief and simple

jollyroger1987
03-14-2008, 10:28 AM
need help people.. could u please rate the following graphics card.. i m planning on getting one from australia.. so help me out

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78531/VIDEOCARDS_GEFORCE_PC...XFX/PV-T88P-UDD4.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78531/VIDEOCARDS_GEFORCE_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/XFX/PV-T88P-UDD4.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/81541/VIDEOCARDS_GEFORCE_PC...XFX/PV-T94P-YDD4.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/81541/VIDEOCARDS_GEFORCE_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/XFX/PV-T94P-YDD4.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/77509/VIDEOCARDS_GEFORCE_PC...XFX/PV-T88P-YDF4.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/77509/VIDEOCARDS_GEFORCE_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/XFX/PV-T88P-YDF4.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78002/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI...S/GeCube/default.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78002/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/GeCube/default.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78347/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI...ire/11121-00-41R.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78347/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/Sapphire/11121-00-41R.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78593/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI...r/47125050-22253.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78593/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/PowerColor/47125050-22253.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/79430/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI...ire/11122-03-41R.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/79430/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/Sapphire/11122-03-41R.asp)

http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78505/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI...70-T2D512E-OC_D4.asp (http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/78505/VIDEOCARDS_RADEON_PCI-EXPRESS_2.0_SERIES/MSI/RX3870-T2D512E-OC_D4.asp)

thanks for ur time an help..

davo81
03-14-2008, 07:02 PM
Well "my" requirements to run the game 1024 x 768 (or higher resolution) Max settings 4xMSAA & 16xAF would be:

At least intel core 2 duo 2 GHz (or an AMD that has around the same power).

At least 2GB of ram (the game does use alot of ram and therefore you will need alot of ram to create a non-hanging experience, also higher speed ram such as DDR2-800MHz does make alot of difference).

ATI cards aren't very good at distance rendering..i would get a card >8600GTS (8800GT would stand up against higher resolutions rush as 1280 x 720 and 1680 x 1050).

Well thats just my final estimate...

freestylegr
03-15-2008, 03:57 AM
can we expect a 64-bit binary release?

davo81
03-15-2008, 04:56 AM
Originally posted by freestylegr:
can we expect a 64-bit binary release?

No, it states in the first post there will be no 64bit edition.

freestylegr
03-15-2008, 05:08 AM
i'm saying after release, at a later time.

davo81
03-15-2008, 05:40 AM
Originally posted by freestylegr:
i'm saying after release, at a later time.

Probably not, but it would be a good idea. The use of DIrect X 10 & 64bit could make the game alot better (performance wise).

freestylegr
03-15-2008, 05:59 AM
that is why i am asking. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

davo81
03-15-2008, 06:12 AM
They should include more post-process effects in the PC version. Like..

Motion Blur
Sun Shafts
Dynamic weather system (Dynamic rain would be really cool in this game, assassinations on a rainy night)
Volumetric effects
Advanced shaders (the shaders in the game are quite good but they could have a higher quality DX10 shader system)

And so on...

Also the sound quality is pretty bad too..Probably decreased because of limiting disc sizes on the 360, and the PS3 has memory issues causing it to have lock-ups during gameplay decreasing it's framerate. So a higher sound quality on the ps3 would make it worse even though it would easily fit onto a bluray disc (BD).

And a higher texture quality is would be very relevant to the pc version as PC's often have more than 2gb ram (opposed to 512mb on the 360 and PS3).

freestylegr
03-15-2008, 06:39 AM
it would be nice.

teemio
03-15-2008, 07:15 AM
Hello,
First of all, I've read the required system specs but heck, I'm still asking: Is it possible to play the game with Windows 2000? I'm asking this because there usually is a way to edit something with regedit. Such is the case with Jade Empire which didnt support Windows 2000 at all but a tweak excist.

So, does anyone know anything yet?

Thank you!

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-15-2008, 08:03 AM
Originally posted by jollyroger1987:
need help people.. could u please rate the following graphics card.. i m planning on getting one from australia.. so help me out
thanks for ur time an help..

would be impossible to recommend one due to your other system specs being different,but i went for an HIS ATI Radeon HD 3870 XT 512MB GDDR4 ,simply because the last HIS card i had was so good and lasted so long against new games.

G-card must be the hardest thing to upgrade,due to the sheer amount of them out there.

jollyroger1987
03-15-2008, 01:29 PM
G-card must be the hardest thing to upgrade,due to the sheer amount of them out there.

u got that absolutely right.. i settled for the asus en 9600GT, the reviews seemed decent enough..

my other system specs are:
intel pentium D 2.67ghz (i know, not that good)
2 gb ram
asus en9600gt
160 gb
win xp 32bit

davo81
03-15-2008, 06:39 PM
Originally posted by jollyroger1987:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">G-card must be the hardest thing to upgrade,due to the sheer amount of them out there.

u got that absolutely right.. i settled for the asus en 9600GT, the reviews seemed decent enough..

my other system specs are:
intel pentium D 2.67ghz (i know, not that good)
2 gb ram
asus en9600gt
160 gb
win xp 32bit </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Should be able to run it well but your cpu will cause the game to have lock-ups..due to the sheer ammount of AI.

scworld
03-15-2008, 08:21 PM
This product does not support Windows 98/ME/2000/NT/XP x64/Vista x64
Then why have a dual-core requirement in the first place. 32-bit is old and not sufficient anymore. Lame.
Bit stupid that my new workstation with (Dual) Quadcore and Windows Ultimate (64 bit) and 8GB RAM wont work with a game.

Jade_Samurai
03-16-2008, 01:15 AM
this will be one of the last releases that is 32-bit only, and if you really dont like it grab a copy of XP pro for almost nothing, or you would have one floating around somewhere, and big whoop, what its like 15 gig, partition that out of a hard drive and just XP and AC on it, no problem

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-16-2008, 06:27 AM
well i hit ebay,and for the first time in a year,and almost fell for a scam.

so thought sod it..just ordered these,

Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3 AMD 770 (Socket AM2/AM2+) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard 1 £49.99

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ Black Edition 2.60GHz (Socket AM2) - Retail 1 £51.99

Corsair 4GB DDR2 XMS2 PC2-6400C5 TwinX (2x2GB) 1 £54.99

yet again i swear a game wont force an upgrade,and it did http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/bigtears.gif
this game better be good as people say it is..or there`ll be a reckoning http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

scworld
03-16-2008, 03:29 PM
Originally posted by Jade_Samurai:
this will be one of the last releases that is 32-bit only, and if you really dont like it grab a copy of XP pro for almost nothing, or you would have one floating around somewhere, and big whoop, what its like 15 gig, partition that out of a hard drive and just XP and AC on it, no problem

So I'll be upgrading my hardware and upgrading my OS to Vista, AND spending even more to downgrade again to Win XP 32? Sounds a bit over the top.

caswallawn_2k7
03-16-2008, 04:54 PM
64bit os can run 32 bit ap's if they couldnt 90% of computer hardware wouldnt work with a 64bit pc.

scworld
03-17-2008, 12:43 AM
Yes, I know. But to say it doesn't support it, well, when there are problems you're on your own I guess.

davo81
03-17-2008, 01:52 AM
Originally posted by scworld:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jade_Samurai:
this will be one of the last releases that is 32-bit only, and if you really dont like it grab a copy of XP pro for almost nothing, or you would have one floating around somewhere, and big whoop, what its like 15 gig, partition that out of a hard drive and just XP and AC on it, no problem

So I'll be upgrading my hardware and upgrading my OS to Vista, AND spending even more to downgrade again to Win XP 32? Sounds a bit over the top. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

No, he means you should make a dual-boot, i currently have a dual boot of Vista Ultimate 64bit and XP pro 32bit. Thats why i have one smaller 10K RPM SATA to get faster speeds on my OS.

Caesar
03-18-2008, 06:44 PM
do u think assasins creed will work on my pc.......------------------
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 3/18/2008, 20:40:21
Machine name: JONESFAMILY
Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp_sp2_qfe.070227-2300)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
System Model: Dell DM051
BIOS: Phoenix ROM BIOS PLUS Version 1.10 A05
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.66GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory: 1022MB RAM
Page File: 773MB used, 1685MB available
Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
DxDiag Version: 5.03.2600.2180 32bit Unicode

------------
DxDiag Notes
------------
DirectX Files Tab: No problems found.
Display Tab 1: No problems found.
Sound Tab 1: No problems found.
Music Tab: No problems found.
Input Tab: No problems found.
Network Tab: No problems found.

--------------------
DirectX Debug Levels
--------------------
Direct3D: 0/4 (n/a)
DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail)
DirectInput: 0/5 (n/a)
DirectMusic: 0/5 (n/a)
DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail)
DirectSound: 0/5 (retail)
DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)

---------------
Display Devices
---------------
Card name: RADEON X300 SE 128MB HyperMemory
Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc.
Chip type: RADEON X300 SE (0x5B60)
DAC type: Internal DAC(400MHz)
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_5B60&SUBSYS_06021002&REV_00
Display Memory: 128.0 MB
Current Mode: 1152 x 864 (32 bit) (75Hz)
Monitor: Plug and Play Monitor
Monitor Max Res: 1600,1200
Driver Name: ati2dvag.dll
Driver Version: 6.14.0010.6561 (English)
DDI Version: 9 (or higher)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 8/4/2005 04:10:38, 205312 bytes
WHQL Logo'd: Yes
WHQL Date Stamp: n/a
VDD: n/a
Mini VDD: ati2mtag.sys
Mini VDD Date: 8/4/2005 04:10:18, 1273344 bytes
Device Identifier: {D7B71EE2-1820-11CF-136A-0826A1C2CB35}
Vendor ID: 0x1002
Device ID: 0x5B60
SubSys ID: 0x06021002
Revision ID: 0x0000
Revision ID: 0x0000
Video Accel:
Deinterlace Caps: n/a
Registry: OK
DDraw Status: Enabled
D3D Status: Enabled
AGP Status: Disabled
DDraw Test Result: Not run
D3D7 Test Result: Not run
D3D8 Test Result: Not run
D3D9 Test Result: Not run

-------------
Sound Devices
-------------
Description: SigmaTel Audio
Default Sound Playback: Yes
Default Voice Playback: Yes
Hardware ID: HDAUDIO\FUNC_01&VEN_8384&DEV_7680&SUBSYS_102801AB&REV_1036
Manufacturer ID: 1
Product ID: 100
Type: WDM
Driver Name: sthda.sys
Driver Version: 5.10.4823.0000 (English)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
WHQL Logo'd: Yes
Date and Size: 11/16/2005 21:36:00, 1047816 bytes
Other Files:
Driver Provider: SigmaTel
HW Accel Level: Full
Cap Flags: 0xB5B
Min/Max Sample Rate: 44100, 192000
Static/Strm HW Mix Bufs: 1, 0
Static/Strm HW 3D Bufs: 0, 0
HW Memory: 0
Voice Management: No
EAX(tm) 2.0 Listen/Src: No, No
I3DL2(tm) Listen/Src: No, No
Sensaura(tm) ZoomFX(tm): No
Registry: OK
Sound Test Result: Not run

---------------------
Sound Capture Devices
---------------------
Description: SigmaTel Audio
Default Sound Capture: Yes
Default Voice Capture: Yes
Driver Name: sthda.sys
Driver Version: 5.10.4823.0000 (English)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Date and Size: 11/16/2005 21:36:00, 1047816 bytes
Cap Flags: 0x41
Format Flags: 0xCC0

-----------
DirectMusic
-----------
DLS Path: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\drivers\GM.DLS
DLS Version: 1.00.0016.0002
Acceleration: n/a
Ports: Microsoft Synthesizer, Software (Not Kernel Mode), Output, DLS, Internal, Default Port
SigmaTel Audio, Software (Kernel Mode), Output, DLS, Internal
Microsoft MIDI Mapper [Emulated], Hardware (Not Kernel Mode), Output, No DLS, Internal
Microsoft GS Wavetable SW Synth [Emulated], Hardware (Not Kernel Mode), Output, No DLS, Internal
Registry: OK
Test Result: Not run

-------------------

BTOG46
03-18-2008, 06:50 PM
Not with that X300 graphics card, you need a much better card than that.

x_101_
03-19-2008, 03:49 AM
WOOT! just thought I would say I just pre-ordered AC fo PC with free special STUFF!

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-19-2008, 10:35 AM
i`m ready http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/rosettahome/tested.jpg

davo81
03-19-2008, 06:27 PM
Originally posted by AJ_Rimmer_Bsc:
i`m ready http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/rosettahome/tested.jpg

All testing "websites" aren't very accurate, you could find yourself running it on max detals but at a lower resolution. Either way ATI cards hate distance rendering and antialising..too bad this game has a lot of both.

hutzdani
03-20-2008, 11:49 AM
Im kinda expecting people who upgraded for Crysis and can play on high settings at 30fps or more on 1024 x 768 and 4x AA (DX9.0c) will cream this game graphics wise, after seeing what people who have the Leaked Dev copy have got, i'd say they are grossley over stated requirements.

My FPS picks up on Crysis when i Enter the Jungle ares which have alot more Shading and Post Processing effects, so if Assassins Creed is anything to go by unless you fail to run an Nv 8600 or Ati Equlivent and have anything less than a entry level Dual Core, i'd say your going to be fine, and anyways whats the point in running games at MAXED out Rez if you only have a 19"/20" Screen of which i'd say most gamers have, considering if you go past 21" and your sitting less than 1 foot away its going to screw up your eyes and the view will be stressful on the neck and back.

and we all know high rez ='s uber strain on your GPU

caswallawn_2k7
03-20-2008, 04:30 PM
people use high rez as it makes the picture look smoother and less pixelated. as for your comment about sitting a short way from a screen so there is no point of having a large screen I use my HDTV and have wireless mouse and keyboard so dont need to be close to the screen to play.

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-20-2008, 04:38 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I use my HDTV and have wireless mouse and keyboard so dont need to be close to the screen to play.

you sir are a .......well there isnt a word for what you are,but you are one..and a total one at that http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/mockface.gif

jealous ?..moi ?...damn right i am.
want a lodger ?...i have cheetohs and beer ?

caswallawn_2k7
03-20-2008, 04:51 PM
Originally posted by AJ_Rimmer_Bsc:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
I use my HDTV and have wireless mouse and keyboard so dont need to be close to the screen to play.

you sir are a .......well there isnt a word for what you are,but you are one..and a total one at that http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/mockface.gif

jealous ?..moi ?...damn right i am.
want a lodger ?...i have cheetohs and beer ? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I have british beer and i dont like cheetohs lol. but it took alot of hard work getting my tv through work so I didnt have to pay tax lol. now all im waiting for is my car crash money then I'm getting a PS3 and some other stuff.

Heuristic
03-21-2008, 02:34 AM
Hi every body, i've problem with my game, sometimes they shutoff and displayed a windows as a error, i can't play until jerusalem

jollyroger1987
03-21-2008, 03:31 AM
Originally posted by Heuristic:
Hi every body, i've problem with my game, sometimes they shutoff and displayed a windows as a error, i can't play until jerusalem

thats because u have downloaded the unfinished version (which is illegal fyi) and since this is an official forum it s unacceptable here, hence u wont get a solution to that problem here..

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-22-2008, 07:44 AM
Originally posted by Heuristic:
Hi every body, i've problem with my game, sometimes they shutoff and displayed a windows as a error, i can't play until jerusalem

yes i remember that game..was called Thief,
you played a Low down thieving swine in it.

i would explain further but i see a ban monster on the horizon hurtling this way and about to snap orf ya nadgers http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/mockface.gif

rezodlub
03-24-2008, 01:31 PM
To all those wondering why dual core is needed for playing this game - IT ISN'T. It runs fairly well on my P4P800E DELUXE (socket 478) with Intel Extreme 3.4 Ghz - Single CPU with hyperthreading turned OFF.

davo81
03-24-2008, 05:28 PM
Originally posted by rezodlub:
To all those wondering why dual core is needed for playing this game - IT ISN'T. It runs fairly well on my P4P800E DELUXE (socket 478) with Intel Extreme 3.4 Ghz - Single CPU with hyperthreading turned OFF.

1) The content of your post is illegal.
2) Your cpu is probably running @ 80C.
3) I'd like to see how bad your framerate is.
4) The game is unfinished, they probably will implement restrictions on single core cpu's to force people to upgrade to a dual core/quad core etc.
5) I'd like to see your choke rate, probably having hickups, soundloops and hangs every 2 seconds.
6) What are the rest of your specs?

rezodlub
03-25-2008, 01:55 AM
Originally posted by davo81:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by rezodlub:
To all those wondering why dual core is needed for playing this game - IT ISN'T. It runs fairly well on my P4P800E DELUXE (socket 478) with Intel Extreme 3.4 Ghz - Single CPU with hyperthreading turned OFF.

1) The content of your post is illegal.
2) Your cpu is probably running @ 80C.
3) I'd like to see how bad your framerate is.
4) The game is unfinished, they probably will implement restrictions on single core cpu's to force people to upgrade to a dual core/quad core etc.
5) I'd like to see your choke rate, probably having hickups, soundloops and hangs every 2 seconds.
6) What are the rest of your specs? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

apropos 1 - I agree.

apropos 2 - Honestly - I don't know what temperature my CPU is running at, but definitely below 75C as that's the warning threshold set up in my BIOS and I definitely heard no sounds from the motherboard

apropos 3 - I said it runs fairly well, and that's what I meant. Even in hi res (1600x1200) it ran, but at 1280x1024 it runs well enough to be playable - dont know how to check the framerate withing the game, but the action seems smooth enough.

apropos 5 - The only sound glitches I encountered are tied to the 'video' parts (the conversations where you can't do anything but wait) with sound being slightly offset (approx 1 sec behind the 'video')

apropos 6 - It's a P4P800E DELUXE motherboard with 2GB RAM, Intel extreme edition @3,4Mhz CPU (2MB cache - no overclocking), Gainward 7800GS with 256MB RAM (passive cooler - no overclocking here either) graphics, ah, and a Zalman cooler for CPU as I like my machine quiet. All of this running under Vista OS (I guess it'd run even better under XP). Nothing fancy, really.

The main point of my post was - I don't know why everyone is so upset about game needing this or that, even before anyone actually tries it. Its a well made game which manages to run fairly well even on mid-range computers.

Jade_Samurai
03-25-2008, 03:57 AM
Well from the sounds of that.
even if its not a legal copy of the game, ubi may have jacked the specs up because they didn't know how well they could have optimized it for pc

also, you didn't mention anything about AA, AF, Textures, Post processing, view distance etc.

so really, even at 1600x1200 any one with a mouse wheel, a mouse and some fire could have rendered decent frame rates!!

Omega_23
03-26-2008, 10:21 AM
Hi all, these are my specs:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz (2 CPUs)
2 GB memory
Video Card:
MSI NX7900 GS(NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS) 256 Mb.
Plz tell me how will i run AC? Plz tell me asap cuz i dunno if i should buy the game or not, thx all

hutzdani
03-26-2008, 12:26 PM
Meh im getting pissed now i find its delayed Again today from my retailer to the 11th april.

WTF Ubi need to get their act sorted now, i cancled my order of thier game, of which im now bored of, as its been to long for it to appear and its been played to death by others, and waiting this long after they promised so long ago it was an early 2008 release, the extra added content dont justify my hard earned cash or time to play what people are now saying is not a very memorable game nore much more than a nice littel bout of a game in the first point.

im not the 7th person i know who has cancled tehir order since contacting play.co.uk so if thats anything to go buy sounds like Ubi need to buck their ideas up, as im sure many otehrs have lost total intrest in this game after all this time, i hope Ubi have some special trick up their asses to make people buy this game now.

oh well looks like ill just keep at COD4 & Crysis for now untill i can get this one second hand or for 9 quid in tescos haha

caswallawn_2k7
03-26-2008, 02:00 PM
Originally posted by hutzdani:
Meh im getting pissed now i find its delayed Again today from my retailer to the 11th april.

WTF Ubi need to get their act sorted now, i cancled my order of thier game, of which im now bored of, as its been to long for it to appear and its been played to death by others, and waiting this long after they promised so long ago it was an early 2008 release, the extra added content dont justify my hard earned cash or time to play what people are now saying is not a very memorable game nore much more than a nice littel bout of a game in the first point.

im not the 7th person i know who has cancled tehir order since contacting play.co.uk so if thats anything to go buy sounds like Ubi need to buck their ideas up, as im sure many otehrs have lost total intrest in this game after all this time, i hope Ubi have some special trick up their asses to make people buy this game now.

oh well looks like ill just keep at COD4 & Crysis for now untill i can get this one second hand or for 9 quid in tescos haha

It took you till now to notice they moved it back? play and game did it about 3 or 4 weeks ago.

Omega_23
03-26-2008, 02:14 PM
Plz someone answer my question!! Thx...

caswallawn_2k7
03-26-2008, 02:23 PM
Originally posted by Omega_23:
Plz someone answer my question!! Thx...
why is it too hard to read the first post in this thread and compair what you have to it?

Omega_23
03-26-2008, 02:47 PM
and why is it so hard to just tell me if you know it? Jeez, ive read the previous posts and it didnt help me much, i wouldnt ask if it would... But you guys have experience so thats why i asked...

AJ_Rimmer_Bsc
03-26-2008, 05:48 PM
Originally posted by Omega_23:
and why is it so hard to just tell me if you know it? Jeez, ive read the previous posts and it didnt help me much, i wouldnt ask if it would... But you guys have experience so thats why i asked...

try here
http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10247/

Omega_23
03-27-2008, 03:55 PM
Originally posted by AJ_Rimmer_Bsc:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Omega_23:
and why is it so hard to just tell me if you know it? Jeez, ive read the previous posts and it didnt help me much, i wouldnt ask if it would... But you guys have experience so thats why i asked...

try here
http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10247/ </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thx, but i did and it doesnt tell me much, i hoped that someone has a similar pc to mine and will tell me how the game runs, anyone?

caswallawn_2k7
03-27-2008, 04:04 PM
Originally posted by Omega_23:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by AJ_Rimmer_Bsc:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Omega_23:
and why is it so hard to just tell me if you know it? Jeez, ive read the previous posts and it didnt help me much, i wouldnt ask if it would... But you guys have experience so thats why i asked...

try here
http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10247/ </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thx, but i did and it doesnt tell me much, i hoped that someone has a similar pc to mine and will tell me how the game runs, anyone? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
dont worry when the game is released just for you ubi will send round an employee to demo the game on your system.

hutzdani
03-28-2008, 03:16 PM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hutzdani:
Meh im getting pissed now i find its delayed Again today from my retailer to the 11th april.

WTF Ubi need to get their act sorted now, i cancled my order of thier game, of which im now bored of, as its been to long for it to appear and its been played to death by others, and waiting this long after they promised so long ago it was an early 2008 release, the extra added content dont justify my hard earned cash or time to play what people are now saying is not a very memorable game nore much more than a nice littel bout of a game in the first point.

im not the 7th person i know who has cancled tehir order since contacting play.co.uk so if thats anything to go buy sounds like Ubi need to buck their ideas up, as im sure many otehrs have lost total intrest in this game after all this time, i hope Ubi have some special trick up their asses to make people buy this game now.

oh well looks like ill just keep at COD4 & Crysis for now untill i can get this one second hand or for 9 quid in tescos haha

It took you till now to notice they moved it back? play and game did it about 3 or 4 weeks ago. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

yeah Mate i have a job i dont have time to go check every day when its released im not sad like some people

caswallawn_2k7
03-28-2008, 03:44 PM
Originally posted by hutzdani:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hutzdani:
Meh im getting pissed now i find its delayed Again today from my retailer to the 11th april.

WTF Ubi need to get their act sorted now, i cancled my order of thier game, of which im now bored of, as its been to long for it to appear and its been played to death by others, and waiting this long after they promised so long ago it was an early 2008 release, the extra added content dont justify my hard earned cash or time to play what people are now saying is not a very memorable game nore much more than a nice littel bout of a game in the first point.

im not the 7th person i know who has cancled tehir order since contacting play.co.uk so if thats anything to go buy sounds like Ubi need to buck their ideas up, as im sure many otehrs have lost total intrest in this game after all this time, i hope Ubi have some special trick up their asses to make people buy this game now.

oh well looks like ill just keep at COD4 & Crysis for now untill i can get this one second hand or for 9 quid in tescos haha

It took you till now to notice they moved it back? play and game did it about 3 or 4 weeks ago. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

yeah Mate i have a job i dont have time to go check every day when its released im not sad like some people </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I have a job but if I have stuff preorderd I always watch the dates so I know when it will come as dates change all the time.

davo81
03-29-2008, 02:11 AM
I found a new screenshot (http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/862/862076/assassins-creed-directors-cut-edition-20080326025422610.jpg) of the pc edition (Thanks to IGN). Looks like a very high level of Anti-Alising (16xQ?).

Here (http://au.media.pc.ign.com/media/839/839699/imgs_1.html) are some more (Entire first page) Thanks to IGN!

In some of the shots they have the GPS with the new investigation icons.

-Rooftop Race
-Informer Escort
-Stall Destruction
-Archer Assassination

FYTJ
03-30-2008, 11:14 AM
Hey, has anyone else realized that there's a new trailer on the main site or is that old news? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif

adarwinter
03-30-2008, 02:14 PM
Originally posted by Omega_23:
Hi all, these are my specs:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz (2 CPUs)
2 GB memory
Video Card:
MSI NX7900 GS(NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS) 256 Mb.
Plz tell me how will i run AC? Plz tell me asap cuz i dunno if i should buy the game or not, thx all

my guess is that it will run. i think that on a decent resolution of about 1280X1024 on medium or medium\high even.
that is my guess.

BTOG46
03-30-2008, 02:39 PM
Yep, just because that video card hasn't an 8 at the front, doesn't mean it's not a powerful Dx 9 card, it's better than the low to medium spec 8000 series.

davo81
03-30-2008, 03:29 PM
There are some new trailers on the site (in HD too), stall destruction and rooftop race! Oh and a 7900 GS is around a 8600 GT - GTS, Of course it doesn't have the tech of a 8 series it's still a "ok" card.

assassin1012008
03-30-2008, 06:42 PM
these are my specs tell me if im able to run assassin's creed.

Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz
Geforce 8800GTS 320mb x16
Windows Xp
2GB Ram

Just need 2 know if it will run on my pc because theres no demo so if i buy it and cant play then im screwd! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif

davo81
03-30-2008, 09:18 PM
Originally posted by assassin1012008:
these are my specs tell me if im able to run assassin's creed.

Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz
Geforce 8800GTS 320mb x16
Windows Xp
2GB Ram

Just need 2 know if it will run on my pc because theres no demo so if i buy it and cant play then im screwd! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif

You should be able to run it near maximum settings, highish resolution smooth fps for sure.

Also im getting AC for pc tomorrow from EBgames (Australia) http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

assassin1012008
03-30-2008, 09:32 PM
Man! it was meant to come out on the 28th of march over here in nz and now its being held up till the 11th!!!!! UN-EFFING-BELIEVABLE http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif

Jade_Samurai
03-31-2008, 05:28 PM
SAY WHAT? its out in aus?!?! i pre-orded it like a million years ago and they were meant to call me!!

Stupid EB Australia, there site says its out, but there stores dont have it!!

davo81
03-31-2008, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by Jade_Samurai:
SAY WHAT? its out in aus?!?! i pre-orded it like a million years ago and they were meant to call me!!

Stupid EB Australia, there site says its out, but there stores dont have it!!

They called saying "stocks should arrive later today", and would call me when it arrives...

FYTJ
03-31-2008, 07:45 PM
Not to ruin your joy and stuff but are they allowed to do that? Cause the official date is not tomorrow. And if they're not, maybe it's not a good idea to say they will sell it earlier on the official Ubisoft messageboard. Remember that PS3 incident in Italy?

davo81
03-31-2008, 08:45 PM
Just called them, the official date for Australia is the 10th of april 2008 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_mad.gif. They changed it early this morning.

DJRDGscorpion
04-01-2008, 04:15 AM
Hey I am new here and don't know where to post but I wanna know if my pc is good enough for this Assassin's Creed :

Dual-core E2160
2GB ddr2 800
120 Gb Hdd
8600 GT

davo81
04-01-2008, 04:32 AM
Originally posted by DJRDGscorpion:
Hey I am new here and don't know where to post but I wanna know if my pc is good enough for this Assassin's Creed :

Dual-core E2160
2GB ddr2 800
120 Gb Hdd
8600 GT

Yes it is, maybye even for medium-ish settings.

hutzdani
04-02-2008, 02:59 PM
Seems that from what Mags & People with the Pirate copy of the game say, that anything above 2.0Ghz ( Dual Core ) and a 8800GT ( 512MB ) will run at full setting nicley @ 1280 x 1224 and AA X2, and as it goes 2gig is recommended with this set up on Vista and id say as most people have 2Gig of ram these days, that should stick with XP as it can only help.

so i geuss anything lower than a 8800gt will run good at lower rez o high settings unless your dropping down to 7900 series or something.

azamato2007
04-02-2008, 03:49 PM
P4 3.0ghz runnin at 3.01 ghz
2gb ramzor http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
and a 8600GT Sprkle

1024*758 on high?

caswallawn_2k7
04-02-2008, 03:55 PM
Originally posted by hutzdani:
Seems that from what Mags & People with the Pirate copy of the game say, that anything above 2.0Ghz ( Dual Core ) and a 8800GT ( 512MB ) will run at full setting nicley @ 1280 x 1224 and AA X2, and as it goes 2gig is recommended with this set up on Vista and id say as most people have 2Gig of ram these days, that should stick with XP as it can only help.

so i geuss anything lower than a 8800gt will run good at lower rez o high settings unless your dropping down to 7900 series or something.
why would dropping to the 7900 series cause a drop in preformance? the 7900 GT/GTX comes above all the geforce 8's for raw power its only the 8800's that beat it then even it is topped by the 7950 GX2 yes its technicaly sli in one slot but it still has more power. going off the generation changes isnt wise with graphics cards as all the geforce 8's came out for is DX10. its the same if you look at the new geforce 9's its only the top ones that are higher than the 8800's nvidia has always worked their cards this way to con people into buying the new card not realising the one they have may be better.

Jade_Samurai
04-02-2008, 04:37 PM
Its not really a con, its just a low-mid range card with new architecture, just because you don't want something fast doesn't mean it has to be old, new cars arn't always faster then the ones before.

and its hardly a con, maybe some people get drawn into it, but if they do they shouldn't be buying or building a computer on there own, like the 8600... i look at that card and im like... why would you really bother, and the 9600, again, not good, but new tech, mostly anything with *800 or more is a high performer from the series from nVidia! not hard

also, who buys a gfx card just because its new, most people look at benchmarks and reviews, at least more experienced pc builders do, but really everyone should, if you can get around with OCed DDR2 and timing adjustments then just stick with a lower end board and save yourself a truckload of money rather then buy the the new DD3 boards, of course, if you want to build a super high performance PC get the new 790i Ultra nVidia chipset or something or whatever the match is for AMD, and the intel chipsets

caswallawn_2k7
04-02-2008, 04:51 PM
the chips that go with the 790i are mainly the quad cores but the preformance of quad over dual just doesnt seem worth it yet.

on the graphics card I ment it is a con as stores will sell pc's to people with the latest pc gaming graphics card the geforce 8 then it will end up being something like the 8400/8600 when realy it isnt a gaming card. I have seen this happen in stores before my parents wanted a laptop so I had to pick one of for them and they started trying to get me to take extra's that were newer but actualy lower spec. so realy it is just a con used by people to sell for a higher price or as a "budget card" to get people to think it is something better than it is. like if you didnt have the pc knolage you have and were looking on a site to build your first pc and didnt know about benchmarks and stuff if you saw a geforce 7 series 7900 for about £200 then a geforce 8 series 8400 for £60 wich would you buy?

milla474
04-03-2008, 07:39 AM
Hey, I'm wondering if you can help me. I've recently downloaded assassins creed on PC. It was an .iso file. I extracted the file as it was too large to burn to a disk, it then lets you click setup, and install the game. Once the game is installed, i pressed on auto run, and it comes up with the options to play the game, view the read me file, quit, etc.. I press on play, but when i do this.. it says "please insert the correct CD-ROM, select OK and restart application". Is there anyway i can actually get rid of this, so i can actually play the game?

Thanks

Scott

The_Gabo
04-03-2008, 08:03 AM
Originally posted by milla474:
Hey, I'm wondering if you can help me. I've recently downloaded assassins creed on PC. It was an .iso file. I extracted the file as it was too large to burn to a disk, it then lets you click setup, and install the game. Once the game is installed, i pressed on auto run, and it comes up with the options to play the game, view the read me file, quit, etc.. I press on play, but when i do this.. it says "please insert the correct CD-ROM, select OK and restart application". Is there anyway i can actually get rid of this, so i can actually play the game?

Thanks

Scott


Lol!

BTOG46
04-03-2008, 08:09 AM
Originally posted by milla474:
Hey, I'm wondering if you can help me. I've recently downloaded assassins creed on PC. It was an .iso file. I extracted the file as it was too large to burn to a disk, it then lets you click setup, and install the game. Once the game is installed, i pressed on auto run, and it comes up with the options to play the game, view the read me file, quit, etc.. I press on play, but when i do this.. it says "please insert the correct CD-ROM, select OK and restart application". Is there anyway i can actually get rid of this, so i can actually play the game?

Thanks

Scott
Yes, there's a very easy way to do this, wait till the game is released for the PC, and then go to a store and buy it.......... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

hutzdani
04-03-2008, 11:58 AM
Originally posted by caswallawn_2k7:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by hutzdani:
Seems that from what Mags & People with the Pirate copy of the game say, that anything above 2.0Ghz ( Dual Core ) and a 8800GT ( 512MB ) will run at full setting nicley @ 1280 x 1224 and AA X2, and as it goes 2gig is recommended with this set up on Vista and id say as most people have 2Gig of ram these days, that should stick with XP as it can only help.

so i geuss anything lower than a 8800gt will run good at lower rez o high settings unless your dropping down to 7900 series or something.
why would dropping to the 7900 series cause a drop in preformance? the 7900 GT/GTX comes above all the geforce 8's for raw power its only the 8800's that beat it then even it is topped by the 7950 GX2 yes its technicaly sli in one slot but it still has more power. going off the generation changes isnt wise with graphics cards as all the geforce 8's came out for is DX10. its the same if you look at the new geforce 9's its only the top ones that are higher than the 8800's nvidia has always worked their cards this way to con people into buying the new card not realising the one they have may be better. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


Lol Wtf mate how can you say the 7900 is comparable to an 8800 GT.

GeForce 7900 GT
24 Pixel Pipelines
450MHz Core
256MB 1.32GHz Memory (42.2 GB/sec)

VS

Nvidea 8800 GT

112 Stream Processors
Core Clock 670MHZ
Memory Clock 1950MHz
512MB

kinda world appart mate you need to do some maths

BTOG46
04-03-2008, 12:11 PM
If you'd bothered to read his post properly, you'd see he did say the 8800 models were better......

its only the 8800's that beat it
He was talking about the lower models in the 8000 series. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

caswallawn_2k7
04-03-2008, 02:32 PM
he got his numbers wrong anyway the 8800GT is mainly 256mb and alot of the 512mb 8800GT's are only GDDR2 when the 7900GT altho it was mainly just a 256mb card it still used GDDR3.

davo81
04-04-2008, 05:37 AM
I found a BENCHMARK (http://www.pcgameshardware.de/screenshots/original/2008/03/assassins_creed_d9_graka_02.png) running max settings (1280 x 1024 4xMSAA/8xAF) With alot of cards..seems the 8800 GT beats the 9800 GX2.. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

Find the full benchmark HERE (http://www.pcgameshardware.de/?menu=browser&mode=article&article_id=637474&entity_id=133800&image_id=797259&page=1).

xyBaX
04-04-2008, 06:04 AM
Hopefully my 8600gt 512mb and my 4200+ x2 will play the game quite well.

Only another week to find out.

Coldfire75
04-04-2008, 07:07 AM
Are 64bit operating systems still not compatible?

hutzdani
04-04-2008, 10:41 AM
Well thats good news then Hehe 8800GT 512 nice settings and a quad here, so im very happy with my rig playing this one, pissing all over the 7900 like i said earler, haha i love it when people have to go eat humble pie hehe only messing, nice to see that my 170 quid was well spent, now olny if my 8800GT did crysis at 50 fps at those settings. . .

BTOG46
04-04-2008, 03:48 PM
lol, you not able to read mate? nobody in those posts ever said that the 7900 was better than the 8800GT, they specifically said that the 8800 was faster, but not the lower 8000 cards , ie. 8600 and below, which those charts clearly show. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
So I doubt if anybody is eating any humble pie, although your reading comprehension skills would suggest that maybe you should at least try a nibble to see how it tastes, and just in case you think cas was defending the 7900 because he has one, he has the 8800. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

caswallawn_2k7
04-04-2008, 04:08 PM
yeh but the 8800 replaced a 7900 so I know how much differance there realy is and to behonest if my 7900 hadnt died and I got the 8800 as a upgrade I would of been disapointed. as BTOG has been trying to point out to you no1 said the 7900 was better than the 8800 but that the 7900 was compairable to the geforce 8 series as it comes between the 8600 and the 8800. but if you want to get picky here are some stats taken direct from nvidia and look at that the preformance rating for the 7900 is just behind the 9600 and not realy that far from the 8800 and above the 8600. now would nvidia talk down their own products?

http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h204/psychokiller_photos/graphicscards.jpg

hutzdani
04-04-2008, 04:27 PM
Originally posted by BTOG46:
lol, you not able to read mate? nobody in those posts ever said that the 7900 was better than the 8800GT, they specifically said that the 8800 was faster, but not the lower 8000 cards , ie. 8600 and below, which those charts clearly show. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif
So I doubt if anybody is eating any humble pie, although your reading comprehension skills would suggest that maybe you should at least try a nibble to see how it tastes, and just in case you think cas was defending the 7900 because he has one, he has the 8800. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

regardless of what yur thinking im meaning your mistaken, he question why anything 7900 or below should run lower Graphics/rez compaired to the the 8800GT. implying that in DX9 mode the performance of thr 7900 was compariable to the 8800GT, in real world terms OC and what not aside, this is pointless trying to claim that the two are compariable in any form at the same Rez/AA/Shadings/PosPros settings.

i must say that the fact is if your running a 7900GT you will NOT get simular reslts to the 8800GT ! ( you have to clarify these thing to People, who take things for face value and start assuming that there PC's going ot run it sweet because they only read half of the Forum posts and miss key facts )


the diffrence between clock speed(s) and memory bandwidth and Pixle piplines of the 8800GT walks over that of the 7900, i was running the 7900 GT at the release of STALKER, im not talking it down it was great.

but for people skimreding the posts your going to get good high end results for a 8800GT or above (depended on CPU) on high DX9 and AA 21" screen compaired to a 7900 high end card at same spec CPU & same settings.

Yes the 8600 is around the same performance ball park or the high end 7900 series, after all Nvidea will make new GPU cards on new Card codes 8800 & 8900 for example to get people who want the latest and greatist regardless if its better than previous series cards. .

but it safe to say 8800 GT new or old archetucture is bet Performance Vs Price
card for AC for the Medium to hihg end gamers. .

Jade_Samurai
04-04-2008, 05:50 PM
the 8800GT is the best performance vs. price of the cards on the market right now, that said, 2 of these bad boys in SLi is still AWESOME VALUE, sneaking its way between the 8800GTX SLi & 8800ULTRA SLi for almost half the price, to get even more performance out of it, get the version with 1gb memory in sli, and you'll be laughing.

for the 9800GX2, nVidia really needed to wham twice the ram in there, only 512 on each board, so 1gb in total... just not quite there for the kind of resolutions people will want to be playing things with it on, it has a very competitive price for performance, pulling around $700AUD wich is just over the cost of 2 8800GT's i dont think it has enough head room in it for newer games with higher textures etc. on the kinds of resolutions people want to play now, im sure they will have a 2gb version of the card eventualy!

hutzdani
04-05-2008, 04:03 AM
Yeah, true but if Nvidea make the 1gig variants of the GT there going to limit the sales of the 8900 X2 series but they kinda did that allready with Shoddy Memory and Way over Priced Cards, not even going there on SLI. . .

seems that if THE 1Gig 8800Gts come alot of people will run those on SLi mode for a little less than 8900 X2 and only get 20% less performance but saving around 200 quid

but im afrade to say i find it that the people who have massive screens at stupidly high res are so stupid, i cant really see the advantage of or running at those settings on a 24" screen, unless you want to play 10 foot away from your screen, 20" screens are perfect for most games these days, i mean look back at XBOX/PS2/GAMECUB we used to sit 2 just over a meter away fromt he screen and the images are perfect to play why should it need to be any diffrent for PC users ?

is there really a Decent REASON as to why your needing SLI on an X2 system ? its a bit stupid IMO

ShaDow_215
04-05-2008, 01:14 PM
Can realy someone suggest what should I do with my pirate version of Assassins Creed.Is there any way to make it work?

BTOG46
04-05-2008, 01:18 PM
Originally posted by ShaDow_215:
Can realy someone suggest what should I do with my pirate version of Assassins Creed.Is there any way to make it work?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4VvBynKsM0

Shrap
04-05-2008, 03:39 PM
My OS: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition, 64-bit

From the first page I see that 64bit vista is not supported.

Does this mean it won't actually run on vista 64bit or that it'll run but I shouldn't call tech support if I have issues?

Please let me know asap as I've pre-ordered before I saw the sys specs and don't want to pay 50$ for a game my system won't run.

Thanks.

caswallawn_2k7
04-05-2008, 03:51 PM
Originally posted by ShaDow_215:
Can realy someone suggest what should I do with my pirate version of Assassins Creed.Is there any way to make it work?
I can see your future (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZtPNsepvX4&feature=related)