PDA

View Full Version : Who wants these flyable aircraft in the next patch



P38Ace
02-23-2006, 05:15 PM

Low_Flyer_MkVb
02-23-2006, 05:21 PM
Yet again the Westland Whirlwind is overlooked - I'm going to bed in a huff. Goodnight.

p-11.cAce
02-23-2006, 05:22 PM
Fiesler Storch, Ju52, DC-3, FW Kondor, PT-17!

CaptAce
02-23-2006, 05:23 PM
Yes, please! Any plane they decide to add to this game, rare or not, is always a lot of fun to fly!

P38Ace
02-23-2006, 05:24 PM
There is an endless of planes we want I will start here

danjama
02-23-2006, 05:26 PM
Originally posted by P38Ace:
I want these how about you

OMG get over it we wont get any of these. This is 2 or more years old stuff

danjama
02-23-2006, 05:27 PM
i will add a mk14 wudnt go amiss

Chuck_Older
02-23-2006, 05:28 PM
I voted Ki-27

Feathered_IV
02-23-2006, 05:32 PM
Hmpf! No one mentions the Shiden?
Move over Low Flyer, I'm getting in http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/sleepzzz.gif

Jetbuff
02-23-2006, 05:33 PM
The only plane I want in the next patch is any plane I can pay for to show my gratitude for the countless others I got for free.

anarchy52
02-23-2006, 05:53 PM
I wan't Spit +50lbs, P-47M 90Hg, Tempest +20lbs, Bf-109K4 4ATA and FW-190D-20 MW60.

SeaNorris
02-23-2006, 05:58 PM
B-17.

Tully__
02-23-2006, 05:59 PM
Get used to the fact that any support for the current game arises out of development testing for the next generation (Working title: Battle of Britain), not out of a desire to further develop this game. We're not likely to see any of those aicraft no matter how much we may want them and even if we do it will be up to talented community members to model the cockpits and crew positions as Maddox Games have repeatedly confirmed they're not doing any further models for the current game.

Akronnick
02-23-2006, 07:36 PM
I totally will quit flying if Oleg doesn't put the XP-72 in the next patch!

No really, I'm serious, why can't we have any ...
[/fades to oblivion]

BaldieJr
02-23-2006, 07:39 PM
Originally posted by Low_Flyer_MkVb:
Yet again the Westland Whirlwind is overlooked - I'm going to bed in a huff. Goodnight.

whats a westland whirlwind?

XyZspineZyX
02-23-2006, 07:44 PM
Originally posted by BaldieJr:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Low_Flyer_MkVb:
Yet again the Westland Whirlwind is overlooked - I'm going to bed in a huff. Goodnight.

whats a westland whirlwind? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

A cool looking plane that made absolutely no difference in the war effort. Only 116 were made, which the RAF quickly phased out in favour of other, BETTER types. :P

General Characteristics
Crew: one pilot
Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m)
Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m)
Height: 11 ft 7 in (3.53 m)
Wing area: 250 ft² (23 m²)
Weight
Empty: 8,310 lb (3,770 kg)
Loaded: 10,356 lb (4,697 kg)
Maximum takeoff: 11,410 lb (5,175 kg)
Powerplant: 2 x Rolls-Royce Peregrine I, 885 hp (660 kW) each

Performance
Maximum speed: 360 mph (560 km/h)
Range: 808 miles (1,300 km)
Service ceiling: 30,315 ft (9,240 m)
Rate of climb: ft/min ( m/min)
Wing loading: 41 lb/ft² (204 kg/m²)
Power/Weight: 0.17 hp/lb (0.28 kW/kg)

Armament
4x Hispano 20 mm cannon in nose
2x 250 lb (115 kg) or 500 lb (230 kg) bombs

Tully__
02-23-2006, 08:48 PM
A cool looking plane that made absolutely no difference in the war effort. Only 116 were made, which the RAF quickly phased out in favour of other, BETTER types. :P
It'd still be cool to have them in the sim though http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

HarlockGN
02-23-2006, 09:15 PM
I think we have more than enough flyables as of now,what we really need are some AI to cover some truly IMMENSE holes in the orders of battle of many theaters of operation.

The following come to mind:

Japanese Navy early and late war bombers (or at least the Nell, the hole it leaves in the japanese OOB of a big part of the war is astonishingly big...)
Japanese army bombers for the whole war, we don't have even a single one, and they're sorely missed, some very important fighters (ki-44 and 45) are missing as well.
At least one italian bomber.
The Hudson, it's really sorey missed for the early war RAAF order of battle.
There are others, but those are the most noticeable holes.

Other than that we would need a couple good med maps, a continental china (hankow area) map, a couple more others for PTO (solomons and philipines come to mind) and definately some more varied naval targets to populate the sea. The PTO ships variety we have is astonishingly small with only two class of japanese destroyers (one of wich, kagero class, repeated five times) and absolutely NO cruisers (and cruisers, light and heavy, were the very backbone of the Nihon Kaigun). The royal navy (the so called mightiest warfleet of the world) is maimed as well, with only battleships and one carrier and absolutely no cruisers and destroyers to escort them...

Don't get me wrong, i ABSOLUTELY love the sim, and i think it's really good and big as it is, but before thinking about more flyables (of wich we have more than enough) there are other, bigger holes to be filled.

SaQSoN
02-23-2006, 09:34 PM
Want me to say, who will NOT get this aircraft in ANY patch?

Mua-ha-ha-ha.

ImpStarDuece
02-23-2006, 09:46 PM
Originally posted by Skunk241981:

A cool looking plane that made absolutely no difference in the war effort. Only 116 were made, which the RAF quickly phased out in favour of other, BETTER types. :P

Bollocks! The RAF phased the Whirlwind out because the Peregine was useless as an engine, Rolls Royce had given up development of it, and it would of taken 6 months to refit it with Merlins, which were in high demand anyway.

The Whirlwind had less frontal area and drag than a Hurricane, better range than any other RAF single seater, was very fast at low level, and was reportedly a delight to fly. All it needed was another 200-300 hp per engine and some external drop tanks and the RAF could of had itself and excellent daylight escort fighter and fighter-bomber.

Of the 116 built, 52 were lost in two years of operations.

RegRag1977
02-24-2006, 03:52 AM
Originally posted by anarchy52:
I wan't Spit +50lbs, P-47M 90Hg, Tempest +20lbs, Bf-109K4 4ATA and FW-190D-20 MW60.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/88.gif

Why not a SR71 fitted with a couple of AIm9? http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Pirschjaeger
02-24-2006, 04:03 AM
More flyable bombers would be cool. The Catalina would be nice too.

Browning50cal
02-24-2006, 04:24 AM
The biggest hole in the U.S. order of battle in the pacific is the B-26. It could outrun a Zero on the deck, drop bombs or torpedoes. It was also a numerous aircraft in many battles from Midway to the Invasion of Normandy.

If the A-20 were able to drop a torpedo, I would not feel as bad about the B-26's absence. Though if it were included, the B-26 would be the fastest medium bomber in the game.

B50

WOLFMondo
02-24-2006, 04:47 AM
A B26 would be a very cool addition.

No hope for it in this sim but maybe for one of the BoB expansions.

XyZspineZyX
02-24-2006, 05:08 AM
Originally posted by ImpStarDuece:



The Whirlwind had less frontal area and drag than a Hurricane, better range than any other RAF single seater,



Funny, wikipedia said that it had a very limited range.

FliegerAas
02-24-2006, 05:28 AM
I'm hoping for this one since original IL2:
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~tc4y-kk/airimage/img2/hs129_04.jpg

And this one:
http://photos1.blogger.com/img/15/1367/640/heinkel177flug.1.jpg
This should make intercepting missions more interesting for the allies:
http://www.luftarchiv.org/waffen/hl131_he177.jpg
(C) http://www.luftarchiv.de/ http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif

valkyrie1956
02-24-2006, 05:31 AM
The Whirlwind was the fastest aircraft in the RAF at low/medium altitudes in the early war years.
Its altitude performance was seriously handicapped by the R-R Peregrine engines it was fitted with which were notoriously unreliable.
Landing speeds were higher than for the Spit/Hurri and as a result it could not be operated from grass 'strips.
However, with four 20mm cannon concentrated in the nose and all-round vision from the pilots bubble canopy it was a formidable opponent...
If only enough Merlins had been avaiable to refit it...

ImpStarDuece
02-24-2006, 05:54 AM
Wiki isn't always right http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

Range was around 810 miles without drop tanks.

Compare that to the other single seaters in the RAF inventory in early 1941:

Spitfire I: 525-575 miles
Spitfire II: 500 miles
Spitfire V: 475 miles
Hurricane I: 600 miles
Hurricane II: 550 miles
Typhoon I: 610 miles

In general it's got about 200+ miles on any other RAF single seater and about 300 miles on the more recent types. That translates to an extra 60-90+ miles on its combat radius or about an extra hour- hour and a half on CAP.

Part of the 'short range' of the Whirlwind was in comparison to other twin engined RAF aircraft like the Beaufighter and Mosquito. The Beau had about 1,200 miles range, the Mossie about 1,100. But these were in another class of aircraft, both weighted about 9,000 pounds more than the Whirlwind and were twin crewed.

The best bet for the Whirlwind would of been Rolls-Royce upping the 885 hp Pegasus to somewhere around 1,100-1,200 hp and working on the reliability. Then you fit an additional rear fuselage tank (say 30-40 gallons), add the necessary plumbing for a pair of 48 gallon drop tanks and a belt feed for the nose cannon to up the ammo count.

With these mods you could push the range of the Whirlwind up to around 1200 miles, and combat radius up to around 350-450 miles. That kind of range is pushing right up to the German border.

Pirschjaeger
02-24-2006, 06:56 AM
Well guyz, the Whirlwind is simply one of the ugliest planes ever built, but that has never stopped us. We have P-51´s right? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/mockface.gif

Something I have noticed about those who like the Whirlwind is that they often mention to range. Think about it, how big are our maps? I think range is no issue in this sim.

I wouldn´t mind having it in the sim though. It´s another plane. The planes Fliegeraas mentioned would be nice, especially the He177.

MrBlueSky1960
02-24-2006, 07:06 AM
Originally posted by Tully__:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">A cool looking plane that made absolutely no difference in the war effort. Only 116 were made, which the RAF quickly phased out in favour of other, BETTER types. :P
It'd still be cool to have them in the sim though http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Tully... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif I think I love you... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/clap.gif

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/Secudus/AircraftImages01/WhirlwindSig03.jpg

Pirschjaeger... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif Whats not to like... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif

FI-Skipper
02-24-2006, 08:05 AM
The Lancaster would be my big choice with the Upkeep , tallboy and grandslam modifications and the "standard" versions.Obviously it won't happen until quite a while after even BoB is released but i'm still hoping! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

Skipper

ploughman
02-24-2006, 08:09 AM
Originally posted by Skunk241981:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by BaldieJr:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Low_Flyer_MkVb:
Yet again the Westland Whirlwind is overlooked - I'm going to bed in a huff. Goodnight.

whats a westland whirlwind? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

A cool looking plane that made absolutely no difference in the war effort. Only 116 were made, which the RAF quickly phased out in favour of other, BETTER types. :P

General Characteristics
Crew: one pilot
Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m)
Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m)
Height: 11 ft 7 in (3.53 m)
Wing area: 250 ft² (23 m²)
Weight
Empty: 8,310 lb (3,770 kg)
Loaded: 10,356 lb (4,697 kg)
Maximum takeoff: 11,410 lb (5,175 kg)
Powerplant: 2 x Rolls-Royce Peregrine I, 885 hp (660 kW) each

Performance
Maximum speed: 360 mph (560 km/h)
Range: 808 miles (1,300 km)
Service ceiling: 30,315 ft (9,240 m)
Rate of climb: ft/min ( m/min)
Wing loading: 41 lb/ft² (204 kg/m²)
Power/Weight: 0.17 hp/lb (0.28 kW/kg)

Armament
4x Hispano 20 mm cannon in nose
2x 250 lb (115 kg) or 500 lb (230 kg) bombs </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Heretic.

MLudner
02-24-2006, 08:27 AM
I'd appreciate more British bombers. Lancasters, Stirlings, and Halifaxes as AI would be just great. I think this is the biggest gap in the game with the lack of any Italian bombers coming a close second.

The Typhoon would be a great add-on, whether or not player-flyable. Those things were everywhere.

CaptainGelo
02-24-2006, 08:49 AM
p47N or M`? the one with different wings...


remember some1 was modeling it a while back....

IronKestrel
02-24-2006, 08:55 AM
I'd personally like a flyable Hawk 75...

Longpo
02-24-2006, 09:07 AM
I'm more than happy with the aircraft we have now but I wouldn't mind seeing some early model P-38s http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif.

Could have Africa/Italy and more Pacific campaigns with 38s then.

carguy_
02-24-2006, 09:19 AM
IMO we should search for info on planes which are possible to place in next payware addons and do polls.Most popular planes would be added and we`d get the majority happy.


For payware addon I want.

Pe2
Hs129
FW190Jaeger
SpitMkII
Me110C
MG151/20 G14 loadout
two western maps
Ki46
MosquitoMkII
B5N Kate

Choctaw111
02-24-2006, 09:27 AM
As nice as getting new aircraft is I think that we should get all of the ones fixed that we have now and once this is done then work on getting new AC. Just my thoughts...

horseback
02-24-2006, 10:16 AM
Well, if we're going to dream, I'm putting in my request for the following, in order of desirebility:

1. Ki-27 Nate (would make Chuck's When Tigers Could Fly campaign a even more realistic-and Chuck, I think it's brilliant now)

2. The light fighter version of the FW 190A: two threads currently running on the subject, and the luftwhiners are absolutely right about this one.

3. Ki-43-II/III Oscars, which actually saw a lot more action than the early versions we currently have

4. HS-123: a significant biplane ground pounder for the Eastern Front; it should be lot of fun to fly and drop bombs from this little hedgehopper

5. HS-129 I've been waiting to do a bit of tank killing in this armored stud since the original Sturmovik

6. Pe-2 ditto on the wait since the original

7. Ki-44 Tojo. A must for IJAAF fans. It just looks so pugnacious and Asian at the same time.

8. The Merlin versions P-40F/L Warhawks. The wilder Warhawk, very effective in N Africa.

9. P-38F/G/H Lightnings. A must have for the 'early war' USAAF.

10. Fiat G.55. The pinnacle of Italian fighter design in WWII, IMHO. Also will give the skinners something to swoon over, 'cause it sported some of the coolest paintjobs in the war.

11. Missing maps of the Pacific/CBI theater; Northern Australia, the Phillippines, Burma, the Hump, China's interior, the rest of the Solomons, AND...

12. THE ABILITY TO MOVE FROM ONE MAP TO ANOTHER IN A SINGLE MISSION.

There's something there for everybody but the torpedo hardcases who can't get over the fact that the torpedo bombers just aren't going to happen.

I'd happily pay for them individually, if that's what it took...

cheers

horseback

danjama
02-24-2006, 11:18 AM
Originally posted by FliegerAas:
I'm hoping for this one since original IL2:
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~tc4y-kk/airimage/img2/hs129_04.jpg

And this one:
http://photos1.blogger.com/img/15/1367/640/heinkel177flug.1.jpg
This should make intercepting missions more interesting for the allies:
http://www.luftarchiv.org/waffen/hl131_he177.jpg
(C) http://www.luftarchiv.de/ http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif

Pirschjaeger
02-24-2006, 11:20 AM
Ha ha ha, Danjama, you are inspiring me again. Consider yourself lucky photoshop isn't on this pc. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

telsono
02-24-2006, 12:10 PM
Here is a list of aircraft that I would like to see, and would be willing to pay for!

Savoia Marchetti S.M. 79 - this give the Italians a medium bomber, which can also be used as a torpedo bomber.

Curtiss H-75 - The Mohawk gives so much more flexibility to the early and mid war scenarios. The last RAF front line squadron use ended in the first quarter of 1944 in the CBI.

Nakajima Ki-27 - IJAF early war fighter, enough said already about this bird by others who I totally agree with..

Martin B-26 Marauder - Actually it was pulled from the Pacific as it needed better prepared and longer airfields. Interesting note that President Lyndon Johnson got his Silver Star in the Pacific theater serving in these birds.

FIAT BR 20 - This would be a second bomber for the Italians, but also used by Japan. I only included it as they must be doing alot of preliminary work on it for Bob as it was the Italian bomber used against England during the Battle of Britain.

Fantasy Requests:

Regianne Re. 2005 - I like it better than the FIAT G-55. In a way its a second cousin to the P-47. The Re. 2000 was based upon the P-35 and some basic design elements (basic wing and tail shape) remained with this bird into its final in-line engine design. It did see combat squadron use just at the time the Italians surrendered in 1943.

Westland Whirland - alot said about this bird and a favorite. We could also ask about the truelly fantasy P-38K which used R-R Merlins, but the P-38 was stuck with the Allisons like the Whirland with the Peregrines because of tremendous need for those engines either produced by R-R or by Packard.

Jumoschwanz
02-24-2006, 12:25 PM
Me

Low_Flyer_MkVb
02-24-2006, 12:32 PM
I must protest in the strongest possible terms about the Westland Whirlwind being referred to as a fantasy aircraft. It's bad enough waking up next to Feathered IV without this sort of insensitive post. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/sadeyes.gif

telsono
02-24-2006, 12:36 PM
Low-Flyer - I love the Whirlwind, its a fantasy expectation by me, not a fantasy aircraft. We have truelly some fantasy aircraft in the game (Bf 109z, etc.). Its a lovely bird and I wish to have it in this Sim, but expectations to see it in this SIM may only be a fantasy.

Low_Flyer_MkVb
02-24-2006, 12:38 PM
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

womenfly
02-24-2006, 12:39 PM
.... just wish they would finish PF with torp planes and such, so we could have air-battles like Midway .... seems PF was never what the name implied. Keep jumping back to FB.

IMO ... great sim anyway. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

SnapdLikeAMutha
02-25-2006, 06:47 AM
Allison engined Mustang (Mustang I / P-51A)

LStarosta
02-25-2006, 07:10 AM
Originally posted by anarchy52:
I wan't Spit +50lbs, P-47M 90Hg, Tempest +20lbs, Bf-109K4 4ATA and FW-190D-20 MW60.

+1

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif

XyZspineZyX
02-25-2006, 07:16 AM
Ok...what about the experimental P-38X which had a flak gun in the nose?

Badsight.
02-25-2006, 08:17 AM
Originally posted by FliegerAas:
This should make intercepting missions more interesting for the allies:
http://www.luftarchiv.org/waffen/hl131_he177.jpg fook me did i LOL reading that caption & thinking about Ace AI gunners http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

VMF-214_Pappy
02-25-2006, 08:21 AM
How about lets not add some more BS planes that never contributed to WW2. Ie Do-335, G0-229, I-185 etc and stop wasting our time

This is Pacific fighters right. We why dont we have any single engine torp planes yet. Was that not a huge piece to the pacfic war. Most the the planes meantioned here Nobody has ever heard of. So does us a favor Oleg dont waste my time with **** nobody is gunna fly anyhow. Give us some Torp bombers.

VMF-214_Pappy
02-25-2006, 08:30 AM
Originally posted by horseback:
Well, if we're going to dream, I'm putting in my request for the following, in order of desirebility:

1. Ki-27 Nate (would make Chuck's When Tigers Could Fly campaign a even more realistic-and Chuck, I think it's brilliant now)

2. The light fighter version of the FW 190A: two threads currently running on the subject, and the luftwhiners are absolutely right about this one.

3. Ki-43-II/III Oscars, which actually saw a lot more action than the early versions we currently have

4. HS-123: a significant biplane ground pounder for the Eastern Front; it should be lot of fun to fly and drop bombs from this little hedgehopper

5. HS-129 I've been waiting to do a bit of tank killing in this armored stud since the original Sturmovik

6. Pe-2 ditto on the wait since the original

7. Ki-44 Tojo. A must for IJAAF fans. It just looks so pugnacious and Asian at the same time.

8. The Merlin versions P-40F/L Warhawks. The wilder Warhawk, very effective in N Africa.

9. P-38F/G/H Lightnings. A must have for the 'early war' USAAF.

10. Fiat G.55. The pinnacle of Italian fighter design in WWII, IMHO. Also will give the skinners something to swoon over, 'cause it sported some of the coolest paintjobs in the war.

11. Missing maps of the Pacific/CBI theater; Northern Australia, the Phillippines, Burma, the Hump, China's interior, the rest of the Solomons, AND...

12. THE ABILITY TO MOVE FROM ONE MAP TO ANOTHER IN A SINGLE MISSION.

There's something there for everybody but the torpedo hardcases who can't get over the fact that the torpedo bombers just aren't going to happen.

I'd happily pay for them individually, if that's what it took...

cheers

horseback

Hey can we get a couple of tie fighters and x-wings to compliment the Ki-84C and I-185. We need somre more lazer beams and pumpkin chunkers in the air.

FliegerAas
02-25-2006, 08:45 AM
Originally posted by Badsight.:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by FliegerAas:
This should make intercepting missions more interesting for the allies:
http://www.luftarchiv.org/waffen/hl131_he177.jpg fook me did i LOL reading that caption & thinking about Ace AI gunners http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

That's about the same thing that went through my mind when I wrote it http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif.

Manuel29
02-25-2006, 09:09 AM
10. Fiat G.55. The pinnacle of Italian fighter design in WWII, IMHO. Also will give the skinners something to swoon over, 'cause it sported some of the coolest paintjobs in the war.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

han freak solo
02-25-2006, 09:14 AM
Originally posted by womenfly:
.... just wish they would finish PF with torp planes and such, so we could have air-battles like Midway .... seems PF was never what the name implied. Keep jumping back to FB.

Yep. I spend about 80% in the European Theater.

han freak solo
02-25-2006, 09:16 AM
Originally posted by FliegerAas:
I'm hoping for this one since original IL2:
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~tc4y-kk/airimage/img2/hs129_04.jpg


Yes, please.

So I can fly blue with a Luftwaffe "Beaufighter".

I said "please". http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/halo.gif

Manuel29
02-25-2006, 09:34 AM
BTW I think we don't need any more airplanes; just wish Oleg can do well with BoB, so that all the planes we actually have could fly like the real ones. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif

Bye

johann63
02-25-2006, 10:11 AM
waite a minute,

two patches just came out and you are posting this?

I understand your excitment but give it some time, dont ya think?


That patch(s) is like a fine cigar, take time cutting the type, admiring the well rolled character, slowly light the end, long draws of smoke, dont rush the burn.

Dont tell me you finished your cigar already. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

jds1978
02-25-2006, 10:56 AM
this thread is more obsolete that the whirly-whatever http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

Low_Flyer_MkVb
02-25-2006, 11:27 AM
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y231/Low_Flyer/shakemov.gif
"Wake up Feathered, it's your turn..."