View Full Version : Opinion review on "The Storm of war"

05-05-2008, 05:57 AM

Anyone that can translate? http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

read the video comments on the page.. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

05-05-2008, 07:01 AM
Gartner said something about the user manual of CFS3 was much softer to wipe your arse with. Rall agreed and bemoaned the fact that the 1946 manual came as a PDF.


05-05-2008, 07:57 AM
******ed. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

05-05-2008, 08:50 AM
well, here there's a comment wich translate the basic :

"It says more or less " opinions of former aces that have been working as betat testers for OM BOB SIM..."1 st acce then says ".. and how its possible that a **** (mierda)like hurricane can shotdown me with so little impacts, I´ve already sent an email to oleg asking this and other details to be corrected"
Then Gunther Rall says: "... this ****ing russian has been ****ing us again, I´m really fed up about this ****, and.. why dont you **** you damn russian!"
Really funny"

spanish is a bite similary to my mother language, portuguese, but I really couldn't translate this interview. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

guess there are some contradictions between SOW and ace's opinions.

for example :


I don't want start another discuss about the P-51 maneuverbility, this already occur thousands and thousands of times here.

but see, Bud Anderson cited the maneuverbility as "one of the features" of the P-51, and also cited "I felt I could outmanuver any German airplane with the P-51".

contradictions and chaos, yes ! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

I don't want start another P-51 performance discussion on this topic, but Gnther Rall in interview also cited the P-51 was "fantastic, higly much maneuverble"

I felt I shouldn't have posted this post.

05-05-2008, 08:57 AM
He ought to print his .pdf onto some of (edited) problem solved http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif


05-05-2008, 10:16 AM
Originally posted by x6BL_Brando:
He ought to print his .pdf onto some of (edited) problem solved http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
Hey! don't be so disrespectfull of RAAAID.. he's a respected alternative (if not over the edge) thinker of the community.

05-05-2008, 06:18 PM
I use to write for ign, reviewing games. Then they went to a pay site and companies pay these sites to write fake good reviews.. since then wont believe any review and they are pretty useless. Sites like simhq have kept thier honesty tho but hard not to sell out.

Its like movie reviews they all suck and get paid off and lots of advertising thats all there is to it. Its like anything else got to try it yourself to see if you like it.