PDA

View Full Version : why toilet paper doesnt go through sanity controls nowhere in the world



raaaid
02-27-2008, 05:50 AM
it can be added adictives, anesthetics, all kind of stuff, anus is very absorvent

my mom told me she was having an herbal stuff that was known for making miracles, later health minister warned people about the stuff since had been localized bottles with huge amounts of cocaine

hell tell me theres no conspiracy, my mom could have gotten hooked to cacaine, when i get superpowers im gonna kick the shi+ out of those bas+ards

DD_GreyKnight
02-27-2008, 06:20 AM
I think you've stumbled upon the greatest conspiracy of recent times Raaaid.

We're all with you on uncovering this!

Good luck.

fumps
02-27-2008, 06:26 AM
I want superpowers.
I want to be able to spread the funk.

With a wave of my hand people will suddenly get the urge to do the hussle in bell bottoms & afro's...they will be ill prepaired for my sneaky power

foxyboy1964
02-27-2008, 08:00 AM
Originally posted by fumps:
I want superpowers.
I want to be able to spread the funk.

With a wave of my hand people will suddenly get the urge to do the hussle in bell bottoms & afro's...they will be ill prepaired for my sneaky power

Too late, Larry beat you to it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2_SreKsg2k&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1IuD6F3R5I

SeaFireLIV
02-27-2008, 08:16 AM
I`m with you too, Raaiiid. But my super powers haven`t arrived yet, still in the post. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

Rjel
02-27-2008, 08:18 AM
Why should toilet paper go through "sanity controls" when certain posters on this forum don't?

LEBillfish
02-27-2008, 08:19 AM
Originally posted by Rjel:
Why should toilet paper go through "sanity controls" when certain posters on this forum don't?

+1

x6BL_Brando
02-27-2008, 08:30 AM
toilet paper doesnt go through sanity controls nowhere in the world

I make it safely through brain surgery only to find this out?


my mom could have gotten hooked to cacaine,

"Cacaine"?

I reckon you are the guardian of the holy misprint Raaid, that is the best medicine I've had for days. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

cheers

B

foxyboy1964
02-27-2008, 08:32 AM
heyhey he's back...how you feeling Brando?

fumps
02-27-2008, 08:33 AM
Originally posted by foxyboy1964:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by fumps:
I want superpowers.
I want to be able to spread the funk.

With a wave of my hand people will suddenly get the urge to do the hussle in bell bottoms & afro's...they will be ill prepaired for my sneaky power

Yeh he's part of my super master plan

Too late, Larry beat you to it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2_SreKsg2k&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1IuD6F3R5I </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

flyingloon
02-27-2008, 08:50 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
it can be added adictives, anesthetics, all kind of stuff, anus is very absorvent

my mom told me she was having an herbal stuff that was known for making miracles, later health minister warned people about the stuff since had been localized bottles with huge amounts of cocaine

hell tell me theres no conspiracy, my mom could have gotten hooked to cacaine, when i get superpowers im gonna kick the shi+ out of those bas+ards
addictive additives in loo paper? raaaid, you been at the shrooms again - i thought you had tied this problem down to worms or something?

raaaid
02-27-2008, 09:03 AM
yeap but i have had garlic pills for 2 months, if i had pinworms that would have solved it

but be realistic if even the health minister warns the public about a product with cocaine what can have a product that dont go through sanity controls

i mean just consider that by putting an anesthetic the product would be sold greatly

i hope not to be giving ideas to anybody

x6BL_Brando
02-27-2008, 09:17 AM
heyhey he's back...how you feeling Brando?

I'm not sure.

Seven days, two neurosurgeons and a bill for 40,000 later - and I still can't understand Raaid's posts http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

Is he real? Or a figment of my tortured imagination?

B

SeaFireLIV
02-27-2008, 09:20 AM
Originally posted by x6BL_Brando:


Seven days, two neurosurgeons and a bill for 40,000 later - and I still can't understand Raaid's posts http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif



Operation success then, cos we can`t understand him either.

Seriously, good to see you back.

raaaid
02-27-2008, 09:26 AM
haha ive question myself often weather im real or not

flyingloon
02-27-2008, 09:40 AM
hey brando, remmeber reading about your bios flash, glad it worked fella.

and raaaid, if you doubt then it proves your existence, the cartesian thingy from descartes. thing is... how do you know we exist. you could be a brain in a bowl being fed stimuli through wires, wrapped in addictive loo paper.

foxyboy1964
02-27-2008, 09:48 AM
Originally posted by x6BL_Brando:
I'm not sure.

Seven days, two neurosurgeons and a bill for 40,000 later - and I still can't understand Raaid's posts http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

Is he real? Or a figment of my tortured imagination?

B

40,000 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif are you serious? What happened to the NHS? Is there any sign yet that the operation worked?

raaaid
02-27-2008, 09:51 AM
i dont know actually i question myself that more often

have you ever fell in love in dreams? i did once really odd

DrHerb
02-27-2008, 07:36 PM
didnt raaaid have a hilarious toilet paper thread that got locked/deleted?

Rjel
02-27-2008, 07:54 PM
Originally posted by DrHerb:
didnt raaaid have a hilarious toilet paper thread that got locked/deleted?

Or flushed? http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

DrHerb
02-27-2008, 07:55 PM
*badoom boom chiiing*

SeaFireLIV
02-27-2008, 11:42 PM
Originally posted by DrHerb:
didnt raaaid have a hilarious toilet paper thread that got locked/deleted?

Indeed there was and we discovered that there really is a toilet paper called... RAIIID!

It just seems like he likes regurgitating the same old pointless topics out of daily random boredom.

raaaid
02-28-2008, 05:37 AM
well if you want to achieve something you must be persistent, i just want toilet paper to go through sanity control

people wants toilet paper that is soft, then obviously somebody must add it anesthetics

why? because of the 6 billion we are there must be some bas+ard

besides dont understimate my power for remote viewing, i was right with existing a toilet paper called bliss without knowing, if i got right what was less posible to know, the name of the brand, shouldnt be the rest of the story based on logic be as true as well

Scragbat
02-28-2008, 07:22 AM
And I thought recycling was a good idea http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

We've been raaided http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

x6BL_Brando
02-28-2008, 09:00 AM
Sanity Clause? (http://www.evl.uic.edu/pape/Marx/sounds/sanity-clause.wav) http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

B

fumps
02-28-2008, 09:39 AM
Originally posted by x6BL_Brando:
Sanity Clause? (http://www.evl.uic.edu/pape/Marx/sounds/sanity-clause.wav) http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

B

Does he deliver presents once a year???

Outlaw---
02-28-2008, 09:44 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
people wants toilet paper that is soft, then obviously somebody must add it anesthetics


Many people don't use commercial toilet paper. How is this possible if toilet paper "must" have anesthetic added?


Originally posted by raaaid:
besides dont understimate my power for remote viewing


Remote view my office and tell me what the sticky note stuck on the wall over the phone says.

After that, view the thread where I posted the free body diagram of a ball rolling down an incline and show me where the physics is wrong (as you claim).

--Outlaw.

raaaid
02-28-2008, 09:55 AM
theres no sticky, but i need not to remote view to know this

Outlaw---
02-28-2008, 10:03 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
theres no sticky, but i need not to remote view to know this

Yes, there is, and it has a message for you. I'm really disappointed that you were unable to view it since I took some extra time to ensure that the translation was correct. Since you didn't see it, I have just proven that you are incapable of remote viewing.

Since you haven't said anything about the free body diagram I posted I have also proven that you don't know anything about physics, that you haven't taken any university courses, and that you therefore do not have a diploma in English ANYTHING nor have you taken any courses towards a naval engineering degree.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
02-28-2008, 10:18 AM
wait does it say raaaid is an idiot? some sort of insult

anyway is something i still cant control but how do you explain that from half million words i got the brand bliss right?

Outlaw---
02-28-2008, 10:32 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
wait does it say raaaid is an idiot? some sort of insult

anyway is something i still cant control but how do you explain that from half million words i got the brand bliss right?

You can either remote view or you can't. Obviously you can't.

When developing a product name it's often desirable to communicate a feeling. You simply did the same exercise that the product developers did and came up with the same solution. Not that difficult and it happens all the time. If it didn't there would be no need for patents or trademarks. Explanation complete.

Why haven't you responded to the ball on an incline thread?

--Outlaw.

DrHerb
02-28-2008, 10:33 AM
My toilet paper usually becomes unsanitary when im done using it http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

raaaid
02-28-2008, 10:36 AM
if you show me a link to the free diagram of the ramp ill take a look

just curious what did the paper say?

Outlaw---
02-28-2008, 11:50 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
if you show me a link to the free diagram of the ramp ill take a look

just curious what did the paper say?

The note was only relevant if you were able to remote view it. Since you are incapable of remote viewing it doesn't matter.

You've seen it before as it was posted in one of your threads but here it is again...

http://www.il-2.info/raaaidscrap/fbd/fbd.jpg

http://www.il-2.info/raaaidscrap/fbd/fbdtext.jpg

Note that I seem to recall that there is a sign error in the above.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
02-28-2008, 12:02 PM
well so you conclude angular acceleration depends only on gravity, then how do you explain my experiment in which the biggest ball fell 1st

Outlaw---
02-28-2008, 12:09 PM
Originally posted by raaaid:
well so you conclude angular acceleration depends only on gravity, then how do you explain my experiment in which the biggest ball fell 1st

NO, it does NOT depend only on gravity!! Are you blind? The equations above CLEARLY SHOW THAT ANGULAR ACCELERATION DOES NOT DEPEND ONLY ON GRAVITY. Once again, are you blind?

--Outlaw.

raaaid
02-28-2008, 01:10 PM
well also on radius, but as you switch angular acceleration to linear, different radius with different angular acceleration but giving a constant linear acceleration

but whats clear is the mass shouldnt matter in the aceleration equation since it gets simplified but in reality does

Outlaw---
02-28-2008, 01:24 PM
Originally posted by raaaid:
...but as you switch angular acceleration to linear, different radius with different angular acceleration but giving a constant linear acceleration

Incorrect.


Originally posted by raaaid:
but whats clear is the mass shouldnt matter in the aceleration equation since it gets simplified but in reality does

Incorrect.

--Outlaw.

DrHerb
02-28-2008, 03:10 PM
*Grabs the popcorn*

this is gonna get good

raaaid
02-28-2008, 03:19 PM
so is it incorrect that multiplying angular acceleration by the radius you get linear acceleration?

foxyboy1964
02-28-2008, 03:19 PM
I deeply dig Outlaw's car, but Raid's sig floats my boat.

SeaFireLIV
02-28-2008, 03:20 PM
Originally posted by DrHerb:
*Grabs the popcorn*

this is gonna get good

I was so tempted to post that... but couldn`t find the popcorn-eating smilie! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

raaaid
02-29-2008, 05:30 AM
maybe its not remote view, call it abstraction

but if i got the brand bliss correct by abstraction why shouldnt be the rest of the abstraction correct?

Outlaw---
03-01-2008, 11:45 PM
Originally posted by raaaid:
so is it incorrect that multiplying angular acceleration by the radius you get linear acceleration?

Sorry for the delay, spent the last few days in the ICU with a family member.

The answer to your question is yes and no. The error in your statement is in it's breadth. It is true for the center of rotation but not for every point on the sphere. It pays to be specific.

As for why your experiment showed the larger sphere going faster, it's impossible to answer. The only information available is a very poorly described narrative of the incident. How about some real quantitative description of the components, methods, etc. Better yet, some photos or video. Until then, you're still wrong.

--Outlaw.

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 12:03 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
maybe its not remote view, call it abstraction

but if i got the brand bliss correct by abstraction why shouldnt be the rest of the abstraction correct?

Let's say that my boss asks me to design a pipe support for a very difficult situation. What I don't know is that a pipe support has already been designed by a co-worker and my boss wants a fresh look at the problem just to make sure. Now according to you, if my design matches my coworker's then I didn't design it at all. Instead I "abstracted" it from his mind. Furthermore it's also true that the pipe is in need of support due to the large number of invisible monkeys sitting on it and that these monkeys flew out of the plant manager's butt. I know it's true because I came to this conclusion while I was correctly "abstracting" the pipe support design from my coworker's mind. Since my "abstraction" was correct, anything and everything else I came up with during this time must also be correct.

That's why.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
03-02-2008, 06:08 AM
yeap thats my plan, making videos of the experiments that contradict current theories

i have the differnet size balls on the ramp and a balance that works with the CenterOfG slightly above the axle and im thinking on a new experiment with vacuum

as for sanity controls they are used so for example coca cola doesnt add cocaine to it, what people doesnt know is that the anus is very absorvent, and even if it was not in purpose toilet paper may contain substance that harm the body and mind

here the reasons becaus im suspicious on galileo:

ive seen in a program testing galileo with a washing mashine dropped and just the box with plastic foam inside, at slow motion you could see how the heavier dropped half meter 1st

ive consider repeating pisas experiment but i cant since from my point of view i couldnt tell which fell 1st id need a person in the ground filming it, if i cant why galileo could?

farther research points out galileo actually did the experiment on ramps to delay motion being the pisa story a legend, i tested on ramps several ways and no way they fall at the same rate

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 08:14 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
...what people doesnt know is that the anus is very absorvent, and even if it was not in purpose toilet paper may contain substance that harm the body and mind...

No, it's not absorbent. Check your English translation.

If toilet paper is so bad, how come out of the hundreds of people reading these threads, YOU are the only one experiencing these issues? As a test, put a wad of toilet paper under your tongue and see if it numbs anything.


Originally posted by raaaid:
...and no way they fall at the same rate...

Here's a suggestion, double check your source and especially the translation if it's not in Spanish. Your lack of English skills (it's kind of obvious you don't have a "diploma in English fililogy" whatever that is supposed to be) is giving you problems. You should pay careful attention to the word "larger" and what it means.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
03-02-2008, 08:56 AM
yes the anus is very absorbent i studied it during my engineering, naval surviving

if you are in wreckage and you cant ingest water because of puking, a water enema would be perfect, also if you are short on water, dirty waters as long as not poisonous can be used via enema

"
Foul water collected on a raft is usually safe to drink but because of the taste it might cause vomiting. To avoid vomiting is can be absorbed rectally by means of a water retention enema!"

from here:

http://www.caske2000.org/survival/survivesea.htm

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 11:01 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
yes the anus is very absorbent i studied it during my engineering, naval surviving


No, it's not. The link you provided states "RECTALLY". That is NOT THE SAME THING.

If it were absorbent then it would be deadly to get in the water. You should take some real English classes if you want to converse in English. That would be much more helpful than imaginary engineering classes.

--Outlaw.

major_setback
03-02-2008, 11:07 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
well so you conclude angular acceleration depends only on gravity, then how do you explain my experiment in which the biggest ball fell 1st

Air resistance and air density maybe? They act on the balls too, slowing them. A feather wouldn't fall at the same speed as a ball - unless the experiment was done on the moon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk

.

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by major_setback:
Air resistance and air density maybe? They act on the balls too, slowing them.


At low speeds and short distances interaction with the air will have a very minor effect.

Aside from simply screwing it up, the most likely thing to cause differences is friction. I've been waiting for raaaid to bring up rolling friction and the way it's applied in the calculations versus reality but, it doesn't look like it's going to happen.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
03-02-2008, 11:19 AM
well as i studied in mecahnichs dynamic friction increases as the mass increases so actually the smaller ball should fall faster

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 12:20 PM
Originally posted by raaaid:
well as i studied in mecahnichs dynamic friction increases as the mass increases so actually the smaller ball should fall faster

That is true, however, if you are doing the experiment correctly, dynamic friction should not be large enough to influence the result significantly.

Why have you failed to either post some video of your experiment or, at LEAST, provide a DETAILED description of the apparatus and method?

Also, please don't give up entirely on the original subject.


--Outlaw.

P.S.
Don't give up on the 6dof thread in Oleg's ready room either.

SeaFireLIV
03-02-2008, 12:33 PM
I know you want to deliver logic and common sense , outlaw, but believe me, you won`t win .

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 12:36 PM
No worries dude. Most of the time, like now, I'm getting paid for these little discussions.

--Outlaw.

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by foxyboy1964:
I deeply dig Outlaw's car, but Raid's sig floats my boat.

Sig added.

foxyboy1964
03-02-2008, 01:16 PM
"The Outlaw breaks away from the pack and moves into a commanding lead, Raaaid has his work cut out for him..."

raaaid
03-02-2008, 01:52 PM
sure you can get different size balls, do yourself the test on an inclined table and tell me

besides all im saying is toilet paper should go through sanity controls for the same reasons creams do some components could be harmfull

you have as much prove they dont put cocaine in tissue as i do they do put it, none

Outlaw---
03-02-2008, 04:41 PM
Originally posted by raaaid:
you have as much prove they dont put cocaine in tissue as i do they do put it, none


Actually I do have proof. Home drug tests are widely available here in the U.S. and the day after this thread started I soaked some Ultra Quilted Northern brand toilet paper with water, wrung out the water, and tested it. It came up perfectly normal.

End of story.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
03-03-2008, 05:28 AM
haha i cant believe you take me that serious

but maybe what they use is anesthetics so appears the softest tissue in the world, this wouldnt be detected by the test you did

i hope you test the different sizes ball on a ramp and tell me

btw outlaw let me ask you something, did you post that from tiny bits of info i infere amazing results, because i read it and then it was not there, so i was wondering if it was a trick of my mind or you posted it and deleted it

Outlaw---
03-03-2008, 06:11 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
haha i cant believe you take me that serious


Trust me, I don't.


Originally posted by raaaid:
but maybe what they use is anesthetics so appears the softest tissue in the world, this wouldnt be detected by the test you did


If that were the case, EVERY brand would feel the same. That is obviously not the case, except maybe for you.


Originally posted by raaaid:
i hope you test the different sizes ball on a ramp and tell me


What's the point? Your experiment was obviously done poorly or you would already have posted the DETAILS of what you used and how you did it. Note that I'm talking DETAILS here. Being so close to a naval engineering degree you have taken many lab classes by now and know how to provide experimental data.



Originally posted by raaaid:
btw outlaw let me ask you something, did you post that from tiny bits of info i infere amazing results, because i read it and then it was not there, so i was wondering if it was a trick of my mind or you posted it and deleted it

Yes, I posted it, and it is still there.

--Outlaw.

raaaid
03-03-2008, 06:29 AM
man the educative system is made in such a way to screw people like me

i took a big inclined table two steel marbles different sizes , and use a pen to let them start at the same time, let them go 30 times and always bigger gained 4 or 5 cm of advantage

the educative system would have dropped each ball at each different time measure it with a cronograph, adjust the error by quadratic minimuns and conclude they drop at the same time, stupid isnt it?

Outlaw---
03-03-2008, 07:52 AM
Originally posted by raaaid:
i took a big inclined table two steel marbles different sizes , and use a pen to let them start at the same time, let them go 30 times and always bigger gained 4 or 5 cm of advantage

You're kidding right? Is this how your lab reports read?

--Outlaw.

raaaid
03-03-2008, 08:14 AM
my mom does for me the lab reports, i just collect the data http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/heart.gif

if you had seen the face of my physics teacher the 1st time i gave him a report on archimedes done by my hand...