PDA

View Full Version : Which will you think it will best idea.



XyZspineZyX
11-25-2003, 01:28 AM
add new variants of currently flyable planes or new addon planes? Also more choice types of bombs

I had some feel that there are so plenty of variants that may more interested to add to play instead of hardship of add new planes?

Some people want Fw-190A-6 and some want Yak-9B (interesting to see bomb's nose stuck out in inside cockpit which is at behind of seat)http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/Istvan/Yak9/yak9b_w100_5.jpg


You may reply add variants you want see it in IL2/FB to be playing.

My long is see Me-109F-4/B and wide choice of bombs like AB24B.

Thanks

Regards
SnowLeopard

Message Edited on 11/25/0306:02PM by WereSnowleopard

XyZspineZyX
11-25-2003, 01:28 AM
add new variants of currently flyable planes or new addon planes? Also more choice types of bombs

I had some feel that there are so plenty of variants that may more interested to add to play instead of hardship of add new planes?

Some people want Fw-190A-6 and some want Yak-9B (interesting to see bomb's nose stuck out in inside cockpit which is at behind of seat)http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/Istvan/Yak9/yak9b_w100_5.jpg


You may reply add variants you want see it in IL2/FB to be playing.

My long is see Me-109F-4/B and wide choice of bombs like AB24B.

Thanks

Regards
SnowLeopard

Message Edited on 11/25/0306:02PM by WereSnowleopard

XyZspineZyX
11-26-2003, 06:41 AM
Oleg, Out of curious, Is Yak-9B too easy to model from existed Yak-9A model? can done in one day? or still need to find an accrute photograph/drawing of cockpit of Yak-9B to be able to do it? I guess you don't have to answer it. That's fine if you want keep it wrap under secret for bonus add if everyone in IL2 community behivor good? LOL. I guess it will be so easy to do with Me-109F-4/B too. smile.

Cheers.

Regards
SnowLeopard

XyZspineZyX
11-26-2003, 11:56 PM
bump

Regards
SnowLeopard

XyZspineZyX
12-05-2003, 07:08 AM
bump

Regards
SnowLeopard

XyZspineZyX
12-05-2003, 08:56 PM
I too would like both these planes, but I think FM for yak 9B might be difficult work, even if 3D model is easy I wonder how difficult it is to change the handling given the weight & CG changes. (?)


:FI:Up-N-at'em

http://www.endlager.net/fis/pix/banners/fis_banner_02.gif

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 04:00 AM
New Biplanes are needed more than anything.

Every country should have one Biplane represented, but Ki~27 monoplane for Japan would be an exception. Don't know about France though. German Biplane would have to be Hs~123 and not He~51.

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 04:14 AM
P-47M,N
P-38F
Bf-109A,B,C,D
Ju-87A
Ju-87T(if we get carriers)
Bf-109T(ditto)
B-17F(and earlier)
Fw-190D-13

All I can think of for now..../i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif


<center>47|FC <img src="http://rangerring.com/wwii/p-47.jpg"<

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 04:16 AM
Bf-109A,B,C,D

Yeah, what necro said.

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 04:23 AM
why would you want anything before the E for the 109, all were undergunned and apart from SCW scenarios. what use would a 4x 7.92mm mg 109 be?

if your gunna have varients make then useful ones of already underrepresented a/c in the game, like JU88R's and P's and the like...

I mena woohoo a 16th varient of the 109, how exicting.

"Culpam Poena Premit Comes"

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 04:34 AM
-- I mena woohoo a 16th varient of the 109, how exicting.

Yes, good point. Just a 109B would be needed. Some of us like the early WAR stuff. Small machine guns were useful against early war aircraft.

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 06:41 AM
LEXX_Luthor wrote:
- New Biplanes are needed more than anything.
-
- Every country should have one Biplane represented,
- but Ki~27 monoplane for Japan would be an exception.
- Don't know about France though. German Biplane would
- have to be Hs~123 and not He~51.
-

Sound so Fishy about British plane! Guess what's I talk about?...Fairy Swordfish! Oh I forget about Gladiator. Too Bad USA don't have them but just some sea-bi-planes.

Ummm....Yeah I want see Hs-123 as it saw heavy action at Russian front until they stop fly due to run out of spare parts in late 43.



Regards
SnowLeopard

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 06:47 AM
Saburo_0 wrote:
- I too would like both these planes, but I think FM
- for yak 9B might be difficult work, even if 3D model
- is easy I wonder how difficult it is to change the
- handling given the weight & CG changes. (?)
-
I suspected why Oleg mentioned about can not able to model exact fuel system on P-51D as I knew about unstable flying due to full tank behind pilot's seat. Let's see what Oleg have to said about it. Also one thing I curious about is how do pilot aim bomb? It may can aim large area like building but may not able aim against armor or flak.



Regards
SnowLeopard

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 06:54 AM
necrobaron wrote:
- P-47M,N
- P-38F
- Bf-109A,B,C,D
- Ju-87A
- Ju-87T(if we get carriers)
- Bf-109T(ditto)
- B-17F(and earlier)
- Fw-190D-13
-
How about Fw-190A2, A3, and A6...

Regards
SnowLeopard

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 07:14 AM
WereSnowleopard wrote:How about Fw-190A2, A3, and A6...

Good idea. And responding to the question, "Why would I want early 109s?" So it'd be possible to have a quasi-SCW in FB. I'd also like to see an earlier,stepped-cockpit He-111.

<center>47|FC <img src="http://rangerring.com/wwii/p-47.jpg"<

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 03:01 PM
WereSnowleopard wrote:
-
- LEXX_Luthor wrote:
-- New Biplanes are needed more than anything.
--
-- Every country should have one Biplane represented,
-- but Ki~27 monoplane for Japan would be an exception.
-- Don't know about France though. German Biplane would
-- have to be Hs~123 and not He~51.
--
-
- Sound so Fishy about British plane! Guess what's
- I talk about?...Fairy Swordfish! Oh I forget about
- Gladiator. Too Bad USA don't have them but just some
- sea-bi-planes.
-
-
- Ummm....Yeah I want see Hs-123 as it saw heavy
- action at Russian front until they stop fly due to
- run out of spare parts in late 43.
-
-
- Regards
- SnowLeopard
-

Id rather have Avia B534, more of a fighter than Hs 123 wich of course would be nice too. (yes, im aware that LW didnt use it as a regular fighter but mostly nightfighter/ training aircraft and glidertug....still it was available.)
http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/images/ab534-01.jpg

Ah well at least we biplanebuffs are getting the Gladiator and Cr42 Thanks to cpt Haddock (with F19) and Xantyhttp://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif Cant wait for some real dogfights between them. Now...if Oleg could be convinced to send along a med/desert map ...........




Message Edited on 12/06/0302:13PM by Olli72

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 05:50 PM
Some of us may already know that Messerschmitt tried put BMW 801 on Me-109F airframe to test fly it but RLM not accept it. I wonder if we should have it and see how it fly.

Also What about Me-109X? http://www.xs4all.nl/~tozu/me109/family/109X.htm
http://www.xs4all.nl/~tozu/me109/family/Images/aj3-x.jpg


It look so close to Ki-44!
Regards
SnowLeopard

Message Edited on 12/06/0311:20AM by WereSnowleopard

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 05:57 PM
i heard that they tried a 57mm cannon in a yak9.
i want!/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif
earlier me109's looked alot different, but i think some E's had mg in hte wings, i could be wrong tho/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif


whineingu /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

WereSnowleopard
04-30-2004, 09:39 AM
bump

crazyivan1970
04-30-2004, 10:06 AM
Why are you bumping this Snow?

V!
Regards,

http://blitzpigs.com/forum/images/smiles/smokin.gif

VFC*Crazyivan aka VFC*HOST

http://www.rmutt.netfirms.com/coop-ivan.jpg

http://www.rmutt.netfirms.com/vfc/home.htm

Kozhedub: In combat potential, the Yak-3, La-7 and La-9 fighters were indisputably superior to the Bf-109s and Fw-190s. But, as they say, no matter how good the violin may be, much depends on the violinist. I always felt respect for an enemy pilot whose plane I failed to down.

WereSnowleopard
04-30-2004, 09:41 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by crazyivan1970:
Why are you bumping this Snow?

V!
Regards,

Oh I forget to add why I bump but let other know that Oleg show us new add plane is Yak-9B. Also Just asking if we can have Me-109F-4/B plus payload for RHAF

VW-IceFire
04-30-2004, 10:13 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WereSnowleopard:
Saburo_0 wrote:
- I too would like both these planes, but I think FM
- for yak 9B might be difficult work, even if 3D model
- is easy I wonder how difficult it is to change the
- handling given the weight & CG changes. (?)
-
I suspected why Oleg mentioned about can not able to model exact fuel system on P-51D as I knew about unstable flying due to full tank behind pilot's seat. Let's see what Oleg have to said about it. Also one thing I curious about is how do pilot aim bomb? It may can aim large area like building but may not able aim against armor or flak.
Regards
SnowLeopard<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bombing is a bit easier when you set the bomb timber to 2 seconds (or more if you want). Then you can fly over at 50 meters, drop the bomb as accurately as possible...fly away at high speed and then the bomb will explode. Works for me...

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

Stalker58
05-01-2004, 10:38 AM
How hard would be to model Yak 9 H (with 122mm howitzer in propeller shaft)? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
I want it and I want it NOW! http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Altitude, speed, manoeuvre and.... CRASH!