PDA

View Full Version : Oleg, will the U-2V be included in the addon?



pcpilot_MGG
03-22-2005, 11:26 AM
I would REALLY love to see this cool old plane flyable ingame. It would make a GREAT primary trainer for user made campaigns. Not to mention the occasional washing machine charlie mission. Come on fellas, make the U-2V flyable... http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

LEXX_Luthor
03-22-2005, 11:37 AM
Cockpit updates last year at suhkoi.

Flyable U~2 should be in Russian Addon.

Waldo.Pepper
03-22-2005, 03:30 PM
/whine

But I want it tooo!

/wine. Hmmm wine!

BaldieJr
03-22-2005, 04:13 PM
I want it!

Gato__Loco
03-22-2005, 04:28 PM
Me too!!!

JunkoIfurita
03-23-2005, 03:00 AM
me five!

HotelBushranger
03-23-2005, 03:06 AM
Me too...I mean six!

LEXX_Luthor
03-23-2005, 07:01 AM
What? Not You 2 http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

jeanba2
03-23-2005, 07:05 AM
Well, if the U-2 is not flyable, it will be a sunday blooday sunday in god's country because I still haven't found what I am looking for.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/351.gif

ImpStarDuece
03-23-2005, 07:21 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jeanba2:
Well, if the U-2 is not flyable, it will be a sunday blooday sunday in god's country because I still haven't found what I am looking for.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/351.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Your from the shire?

MajorBloodnok
03-23-2005, 08:05 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jeanba2:
Well, if the U-2 is not flyable, it will be a sunday blooday sunday in god's country because I still haven't found what I am looking for.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/351.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You're taking it to the Edge man. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blink.gif

mortoma
03-23-2005, 08:41 AM
In the Russian add-on?? But I thought the Russians liked to shoot down U-2s?? Remember Francis Gary Powers?? Oops, that was a different and less Russian friendly U-2!!!

Seriously, who wouldn't want to fly such a plane?? Many of us have a fascination with flying weak and slow planes, I'm no exception.

jeanba2
03-23-2005, 09:07 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by mortoma:

Seriously, who wouldn't want to fly such a plane?? Many of us have a fascination with flying weak and slow planes, I'm no exception. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, and what I would like would be to fly as a North Korean pilot, by night and destroy on the ground or score "maneuver kills" against US jets !!!!

Don't worry anyway, the U2 will be available ... on new years day

DjTeD
03-23-2005, 09:28 AM
You are right, guys !!! This little machine would be VERY interesting to fly !!!

Come on !!! Let's have some more bi-planes !!!

Love those planes !!!

LBR_Barkhorn
03-23-2005, 09:40 AM
I have a little gift for you, guys...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v424/bringhenti/Po2gunner.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v424/bringhenti/po2gun2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v424/bringhenti/Po-2downright.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v424/bringhenti/Po2downleft.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v424/bringhenti/po2down.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v424/bringhenti/Po-2center.jpg

LEXX_Luthor
03-23-2005, 11:20 AM
Simple and Classy!

We http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/heart.gif Biplane cockpits

darkhorizon11
03-23-2005, 02:54 PM
Thats gorgeous!

Will this actually make it into 4.0 or is it just another Russia add-on wet dream though?

Waldo.Pepper
03-23-2005, 04:44 PM
Oh leg! Oh leg! Oh leg! Oh leg!

c'mon!

EVERYBODY!!

Oh leg! Oh leg! Oh leg! Oh leg!

p1ngu666
03-23-2005, 05:03 PM
**** looks suburb, apart from the seat http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

looking forward to this giant killing ride http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

CKY_86
03-23-2005, 05:58 PM
should make for some online fun

bloke in ki84 ' ill go intecept tha... im goin round again' http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

LEXX_Luthor
03-23-2005, 06:08 PM
This plane should be able to maneuver below the tops of the FB Forest Sheets.

HotelBushranger
03-24-2005, 02:12 AM
Nice U-2 pit shots! I thought it was designated the Po-2 back then, after the designer Mr Polikarpov died in 44/43 I think. All the search engines accept Po-2, when I looked up U-2 all I got was the musical group
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/351.gif

harryrriedl
03-24-2005, 03:00 AM
it should be fun to fly as its the slowest plane in the game. the train in the game is almost as fast its top speed is 115km acoulding to to the viwer.

p.s dose any one know what its loss rate was.

DuxCorvan
03-24-2005, 05:56 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by harryrriedl:
p.s dose any one know what its loss rate was. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Loss-rate? Almost infinite to none, harry. It ain't no fighter, and I doubt it could survive an encounter with modern fighters. It was used as trainer, recon in quiet environments, and most of all, in night harass missions over Axis trenches to mine their morals and deprive them of resting with little bombs, loud noises and sirens, and propaganda. Many of these missions were carried by female Soviet pilots.

LBR_Barkhorn
03-24-2005, 03:28 PM
I've received those pics from Boosher in late 2004.

LEXX_Luthor
03-24-2005, 06:49 PM
Also used to transport Partisan organizers into the German rear.

Read one story where the U2 would fly Low and Slow over Snow and the Partisan guy would jump out (at night) and land in the deep snow.

darkhorizon11
03-24-2005, 08:24 PM
Its only real defense was its ability to hide in clouds, making it unsafe to fly during the day. Too bad view limitations involving clouds day and night aren't modeled or else the possibilities would be endless.

HotelBushranger
03-24-2005, 08:39 PM
I remember reading once, where a German 109 pilot found a low flying U-2, he tried to shoot hit down but the recoil fromn the cannon stalled the aeroplane and he crashed. When he was recovering in hospital, he learnt he had shot down the U-2 and was awarded the Iron Cross

Feathered_IV
03-24-2005, 08:39 PM
Looks a bit like the Type-93. *Sigh* How wonderful it would be to get all these beautiful Cr@p planes.

p1ngu666
03-24-2005, 09:44 PM
think they had lowest losses's in the VVS, last in line for parachutes because of that.

german day fighters would go mad trying to shoot down po2. its so slow, and u just cruise along .1cm above the ground http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

think they also flew very low and at night, and was largely imune to radar, and produced little exhaust glow.

its cr@pness is largely what made it great, ironicly http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

SaQSoN
03-25-2005, 12:13 AM
There was a large monography-like article about the Po-2 in the Ukrainian aviation magazine "Aviatsiya i Vremia" (Aviation and Time).
According to this article the whole battle losess of the Po-2 can be estimated at about 800-1000 planes throughout the WWII. Most of this planes were night bombers.
By the 1943 Germans designed a special anti-Po-2 tactics, involving searchlights, listening posts and night fighters (usually Bf-109 or Bf-110).
The nightfighter would patrol over the designated area and wait until the searchlights will capture the Po-2. Then it will attack the well highlighted target, kill it in one pass and go back to patrol. The searchlights will go off and wait for another U-2, which usually will follow in 3-5 minutes behind the first one.
Using this tactics, ober feldfebel Kotzek (SP?) shot down 4 U-2 during one patrol.
BTW,if the U-2 would catch fire, it will be completely burn off in 45 seconds!

p1ngu666
03-25-2005, 07:16 AM
think bomber command lost 9000-10000 aircraft in ww2, so po2 was way safer http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

AARDVARK421
12-29-2005, 08:17 AM
Info Taken from http://pratt.edu/~rsilva/witches.htm

In 1942 the Soviet Union formed three regiments of women combat pilots who flew night combat missions of harassment bombing. They flew obsolete Polikarpov Po-2 biplanes, that were otherwise used as trainers, and which could only carry 2 bombs that weighted less than a ton altogether. They were so successful and deadly the Germans feared them, calling them "Nachthexen"€"night witches. (Some sources state that they were nicknamed "Night Witches" because it was made up entirely of female pilots and they flew their missions in the wooden Po-2's at night.)

The Night Witches were the women of the 588th Night Bomber Regiment. All of the mechanics and bomb loaders of this regiment, as in the 586th IAP and the 587th Bomber Regiment, were also women.

The Soviet women bomber pilots earned in total 23 Hero of the Soviet Union medals and dozens of Orders of the Red Banner. Two women bomber pilots€"Katya Ryabova and Nadya Popova€"in one night raided the Germans 18 times. The Po-2 pilots flew more than 24,000 sorties and dropped 23,000 tons of bombs. Most of the women bomber pilots who survived the war in 1945 had racked up nearly 1,000 missions each. They had served so exemplarily throughout the whole war that they participated in the final onslauqht on Berlin.


Tactics used by the Night Witches
The 588th, like all night bomber regiments, usually practiced harassment bombing. This consisted of going to the encampments, rear area bases, supply depots, etc., where the enemy was trying to rest from a day of heavy fighting to another, and bombing them. The strategic importance of the targets was seldom high, but the psychological effect of terror and insecurity and constant restlessness in the Germans (and Rumanians, Italians, Finns...) was very effective.
Harassment night bombing was very difficult to do, considering the low performance of the Po-2 biplanes (their top speed was 94 mph/150 kph, less even than most World War I fighters!) and how vulnerable that made them to enemy night fighters. But the Night Witches learned their trade well. The Po-2 was very slow, but it was also very maneuverable. When a German Me-109 tried to intencept it, the Russian plane could turn violently and nimbly at much less than the 109's minimum speed (stall speed), requiring that the German make a wide circle to come in for another pass. Then he was again met with the same evasive tactic, time after time. Many pilots got to nearly earth-level, flying low enough to be hidden behind hedgerows! The German fighter could only try again and again until he got frustrated and just left the Po-2 alone. No wonder, German pilots were promised an Iron Cross for shooting down a Po-2.

Note: Actually, the stall speed of the E, F, and G models of the Me-109 (the ones used in the Soviet Union) was nearing 120 mph/192 kph, so the Messerschmitt could never equal the speed of the Po-2, because even the Russian biplane's top speed was lesser than the German fighter's stall speed. The other fighter (more commonly) used in the Eastern Front, the Focke-Wulf FW-190A, had also a high stall speed, so its predicament was the same.

The Witches would fly to a certain distance of the enemy encapments that were to be the target, and cut their engine. They would then glide silently, silently... When the Fascists started to hear the whistle of the wind against the Po-2's wing bracing wires, they realized in panic that it was too late. The Night Witches would sneak up on them and release their bombs, then restart their engines and fly away home.

The Po-2 would pass often undetected by the night fighters' radar, because of the mildly radar absorbing nature of the canvas surfaces, and the fact that mostly they flew near the ground. German planes equipped with infrared seekers would not see the little heat generated by the small, 110 horsepower engine.

Searchlights, however, were another story. The Germans at Stalingrad developed what the Russians called a "flak circus". They would bring out the flak guns that had been hidden during the day, and lay them in concentric circles around probable targets, and the same with the searchlights. Po-2s crossing the perimeter in pairs in the straight line flight path typical of untrained but determined Russian flyers were usually ripped to pieces by the Flak 37 guns. The 588th, however, developed another tactic. They flew in formations of three. Two would go in first, attract the attention of the searchlights, and when all of them pointed to them in the sky, separate suddenly in opposite directions and maneuver wildly to try to shake them off. The German searchlight operators would follow them, while the third bomber who was farther back snuck in through the darkened path made by her 2 comrades and hit the target unopposed. She would then get out, rejoin with the other two, and they would switch places until all three had delivered their payloads. It took nerves of steel to be a decoy and willingly attract enemy fire, but as Nadya Popova said: "It worked."
This is campaign material.
Vark

gthgrrl4game
12-29-2005, 08:40 AM
Originally posted by AARDVARK421:
This is campaign material.
Vark

Yes!!! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif

DIRTY-MAC
12-29-2005, 11:03 AM
Those women were some excellent pilots!
hmmm im wondering how many pilots at the western front flew around 800-1000 missions?

also there were some great female fighter Aces
here are some:
http://pratt.edu/%7Ersilva/sovwomen.htm

jarink
12-29-2005, 12:25 PM
Originally posted by mortoma:
Many of us have a fascination with flying weak and slow planes, I'm no exception.

Ah, another Mustang driver, I see! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/88.gif

Seriously, I find myself flying biplane quick missions more and more. They can really be fun!

CornbreadPattie
12-29-2005, 01:05 PM
Originally posted by jeanba2:
Well, if the U-2 is not flyable, it will be a sunday blooday sunday in god's country because I still haven't found what I am looking for.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/351.gif

at the corner where the streets have no name... look there

gthgrrl4game
12-29-2005, 01:48 PM
Biplanes=Stallfighting Goodness http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Waldo.Pepper
12-29-2005, 02:58 PM
Helabump!!

Does anyone know if we get it or not YET!!

RAF92_Moser
12-29-2005, 04:28 PM
Originally posted by CornbreadPattie:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jeanba2:
Well, if the U-2 is not flyable, it will be a sunday blooday sunday in god's country because I still haven't found what I am looking for.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/351.gif

at the corner where the streets have no name... look there </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Boy, i got Vertigo after reading all this..you guys move in Mysterious Ways...maybe we can get the U-2 on New Years Day...and by the way...what's the max Elevation can this Fly get...possibly high enough to get over One Tree Hill..or we will have to scream Achtung Baby.

slo123
12-29-2005, 07:22 PM
isnt the u-2 a high altspy plane from cold war or am i stupid??

berg417448
12-29-2005, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by slo123:
isnt the u-2 a high altspy plane from cold war or am i stupid??

Polikarpov U2

http://us.st11.yimg.com/store1.yimg.com/I/internethobbies_1874_6652303

HotelBushranger
12-29-2005, 11:57 PM
What Berg posted is the U-2VS / Po-2.

The U-2 is the spy plane. Just think VS = VVS = Russian = Uber biplane http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

And just think of all the possible WW1 campaigns we could have with this!!!

pcpilot_MGG
12-30-2005, 10:24 AM
Ardvark, that was a fascinating story, thanks man; I love stuff like that.

Jarink, I agree 100%; I LOVE biplane quick missions. I have a couple saved that I start up all the time. Each side has a full 16 planes. One has the I-153, the other the Fiats, Gladiators, or even the P-11...loads of fun. Talk about down and dirty, right above the ground! Best not blink...

Sure hope this cool old bird comes out...http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

NekoReaperman
12-30-2005, 04:33 PM
So is this all speculation, or is there a real possibility that this plane could be included in the near future?


I would LOVE a U2 campaign :-)

ElAurens
12-30-2005, 05:20 PM
I'd say don't hold your breath.

Tooz_69GIAP
12-30-2005, 06:05 PM
There were progress screenies of the pit, but I don't know if it was completed, and if it was, whether it was submitted before the April deadline earlier this year. I have a vague memory of hearing it was submitted, and rumours that it might come in one of these Russian add-ons, but it's far too foggy a memory to really say yay or nay to it.

I would definately love to this aircraft in the game. I reckon, along with the Pe-2 and IL-10, this aircraft has more right that any other aircraft to be modelled as flyable in the sim.

PBNA-Boosher
12-30-2005, 11:15 PM
I posted those pics a while ago. Hopefully we'll get them!

Tooz_69GIAP
12-31-2005, 02:54 AM
No, the pics were posted at Sukhoi.ru forums first, either by SaQsOn, or the modeller. Then were posted here and on SimHQ I believe afterward.

Hoatee
12-31-2005, 07:12 AM
Originally posted by slo123:
isnt the u-2 a high altspy plane from cold war or am i stupid??

B won for u.

slo123
01-02-2006, 08:57 PM
Originally posted by berg417448:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by slo123:
isnt the u-2 a high altspy plane from cold war or am i stupid??

Polikarpov U2

http://us.st11.yimg.com/store1.yimg.com/I/internethobbies_1874_6652303 </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

ahh so i am stupid o well i tried to google image but nothing on u-2v u-2 spy plane kept popin up so...

slo123
01-02-2006, 08:58 PM
Originally posted by Hoatee:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by slo123:
isnt the u-2 a high altspy plane from cold war or am i stupid??

B won for u. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

huh?

Siwarrior
01-03-2006, 12:55 AM
All you U-2V lovers

why don't you start a new thread called
" The U-2V won the war" http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

HotelBushranger
01-03-2006, 02:25 AM
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

darkhorizon11
01-03-2006, 01:46 PM
Now if we do get this plane all I need to do is download some britney spears christina aguilera jessica simpson and lindsey lohan pilot skins for some sweet nachthexen action!

msalama
01-03-2006, 02:40 PM
Oh, to have this sweet biplane flyable http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/heart.gif

There was a time, not so long ago, when all I flew for awhile was a Chaika vs. 4 Gladiators in QMB... SOOOO schhhweeeet... Now if that's not ACTION then what the heck is???

Yeah, you either give us our U-2 or you call the ruddy wahmbulance http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

msalama
01-04-2006, 11:42 AM
why don't you start a new thread called
"The U-2V won the war" http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

Because the Sturmovik won the war. That's why.

UberDemon
01-04-2006, 10:10 PM
Oh yeah, this bird would be awesome. In the meantime, it would be nice if Oleg added the weapon loadout of 8x 132mm RS-132 rockets. Those rockets are already modelled in the sim. The rear machine gun could also be placed in a fixed rearward position during ground operations... (I guess to fire straight back when pulling up... perhaps a deterrent more than anything, cos it does not seem very efficient)

(source and pictures for rocket load and rear gun: "Soviet Combat Aircraft of the Second World War, Vol 2 Twin Engined Fighters, Attack Aircraft and Bombers" 1999, Yefim Gordon, Dmitri Khazanov, Alexander Medved', pages 70-71)

Best regards,
Demon/UberDemon
http://www.uberdemon.com

HotelBushranger
01-04-2006, 11:30 PM
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif I'm pretty sure the U-2 didn't have rocket mounts, and if they did it would hace caused the plane to stall out http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

UberDemon
01-12-2006, 11:43 AM
Originally posted by HotelBushranger:
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif I'm pretty sure the U-2 didn't have rocket mounts, and if they did it would hace caused the plane to stall out http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

It is possible. I just like to mention again that the source I quoted above, the picture shows the U-2 with the rockets, and the authors mentioned the U-2 did carry them. It could always be a mistake, but the series is fairly respected for being accurate, and considering two of the authors in that volume are Russian, and the sources are from Russian origin, and Soviet AF op records, I am hoping it is somewhat accurate.

D/UD

CzechTexan
01-13-2006, 05:22 PM
Rockets? I wonder if that would be a fire hazard for the canvas covered plane http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_confused.gif
The Po-2/U2vs was known to catch fire fairly easily.

UberDemon
01-17-2006, 10:26 PM
The Polikarpov R-5 biplane was also fitted with rockets on occasion. I guess it would be interesting to know how often they (U-2VS & R-5)carried that armament.

The Su-2 also carried a modified armament of rockets... but that is not represented in FB/PF, neither on the FM-2.

D/UD

Sit.Nik.
05-12-2007, 04:02 PM
Приветствую всех!!! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
первое что сразу хочу сказать, это то что я из *оссии, и с Английским языком у меня проблемы... но надеюсь вы меня поймёте... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
а спросить я хотел вот что ... что это за *усский Аддон в который по слухам должен был войти У2/По2 ...
и второе.. вот уже год прошёл с последнего сообщения в теме ... она умерла? ... если какие нибудь слухи про *тот Самолёт? ... войдёт ли он в какой нbиудь патч ...
вообще кто нибудь что нибудь слышал об этом в последнее время?

Hello to All Virpils!!! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
first that i want to say, its that i'm from Russia and my english very bad, and i'm very sorry for that... but i hope that you can understand me...
I want want to know,which russian Addon, in which will be included U2/Po2...
since time of the last message in this subject passed year... that or changed for this time?
may be some of you heard any rumours about that?

i want Very Much to fly on this storied plane ...

p.s. excuse me for mistakes, please http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

ElAurens
05-12-2007, 04:23 PM
The rumor was that 1946 would contain this aircraft, and several others that are done, or nearly so. I did not happen.

Hopefully there will be a 4.09 patch that will add the aircraft that are missing.

Your English is far better than my Russian!

LEXX_Luthor
05-12-2007, 05:38 PM
Nah. Time to move on. Save U-2 for the Beyond part of BoB And Beyond. Granted, Oleg did poast "return to Easter Front in 7 years" but that was last year or so. So its only 5 or 6 years left which really is not much longer than the classical "two week(tm)" period seems to have become. On the other hand, U-2 may show up in the Luthier Korea sim, or (hopefully http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif ) Luthier SAC-vs-PVO Siberia Sim with electronic warfare modelling. It would be interesting to try to down a U-2 with an Su-9 zoom climb. I have read that a few Sukhoi test pilots were stationed to try it, and one unarmed Su-9 ferry pilot was ordered to ram a U-2 in a zoom climb, but they were outside of range or so its said, so the S-75 seems to have beat them to the party.

slo_1_2_3
05-12-2007, 09:30 PM
So is there even a 4.09 patch coming or is it confirmed yet? or did someone just say something and everyone ran with it?

Tooz_69GIAP
05-13-2007, 12:00 AM
There will be a 4.09 patch, but when it will be released is not sure.

XyZspineZyX
05-13-2007, 07:38 AM
All right, who is the Ressurectionist who brought this one back?

ElAurens
05-13-2007, 08:21 AM
Well, it's sorta close to Easter.

http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

msalama
05-13-2007, 10:01 AM
Yah, but would love to see this flyable still http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gifhttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gifhttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

PS. Wasn't me who brought this back though.

slo_1_2_3
05-14-2007, 12:52 AM
I'm gonna say it was Sit.Nik.

URlNSTlNKT
05-14-2007, 02:26 AM
If we will have it in RGG's Korea add on we will have it in later SoW add ons. Be shure.

http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/6610/biplaneig0.png

Sit.Nik.
05-14-2007, 11:36 AM
Hello Again!!! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Yes, it's was me, who bring this topic to life... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif


URlNSTlNKT, from where this picture? . and, what does it mean - " RGG's Korea add on " ... Addon for what? as far as i know RRG does it's own project, " Stand Alone Title " if so be possible expressed...
SaQsOn told, that U2 will be in Korea Sim, and and possible since time to appear and in SoW...

p.s. and as always much apologize for my mistakes in Post

NAFP_supah
05-20-2007, 05:27 AM
Originally posted by Sit.Nik.:
Hello Again!!! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Yes, it's was me, who bring this topic to life... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif


URlNSTlNKT, from where this picture? . and, what does it mean - " RGG's Korea add on " ... Addon for what? as far as i know RRG does it's own project, " Stand Alone Title " if so be possible expressed...
SaQsOn told, that U2 will be in Korea Sim, and and possible since time to appear and in SoW...

p.s. and as always much apologize for my mistakes in Post

Well your english isn't that bad http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif RRG is developing a simulation based on the korean conflict for the new Storm Of War engine from maddox games apparently http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Sit.Nik.
05-22-2007, 10:00 AM
as far as i know, Korean Sim will be separate project ... separate from Storm of the war ...
and maximum on that possible to hope on that models from korea fall into Storm of the war ...
Well... remain to wait to hope and believe http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

p.s. and Again, as always much apologize for my mistakes in Post

avimimus
05-27-2007, 09:12 PM
English is an offically Anglo-Saxon/Norman/Celtic/Norse/Netherlands hybrid offshoot. A hundered and fifty years ago there was little agreement on spelling. It was traditional to create new words by combining old ones.

Anything that you can bring to English improves it...never appolosize.

Long life to Oleggish!

P.S.
The existence of the U-2 in Luthier's sim (its not technically an addon) would seem to indicate that it won't be released in the Il-2 engine.

I could always be wrong. The important thing: It looks like we will get it.

S!

Sit.Nik.
05-28-2007, 08:31 AM
Thank you very much http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

That U-2 won't be released in the Il-2 engine. Will U2 be released in the SoW engine!? That is the question!!! and that most important, will be U2 included in to SoW sim series?

i hope! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif and Belive ! ^)

weaselwagon1
05-31-2007, 09:50 AM
Why is it that when myself and others have asked about a KI44 or a Griffon-Engined Spit we get all kinds of Self-righteous,condescending remarks that we "should be happy with what we have" or "impossible,all efforts are on the new game"?

ElAurens
05-31-2007, 10:30 AM
Some forum "residents" do need a lesson in manners for sure.

And another take is that the "blue" Luftwaffe fanboys are truely scared of the late Spits, and this same bunch, when flying in the Pacific generaly fly Allied (wierd huh?), and again want no serious competetion. It's all about their precious online stats, don't you know.

And it must be said that we are well beyond the point of adding any aircraft to the current sim tht are not already finished.

weaselwagon1
05-31-2007, 10:34 AM
Why?

ElAurens
05-31-2007, 10:46 AM
weaselwagon1, the deadline for submitting new aircraft to Maddox Games for what has become 1946 was over a year ago.

Making new 3D models and coding their flight and damage models is a very time consuming, and expensive job. With Maddox now almost totally devoted to the new sim, "Storm of War: Battle of Britain", there simply is no economic reason to develoop new aircraft for the current sim.

There are a few more aircraft in the pipeline, but not the ones you ask for.

I wish it were not so, but that is the reality of it.

I hope you are enjoying FB/PF/1946 in any case.

weaselwagon1
05-31-2007, 10:50 AM
There's gotta be something that can be done....

JG53Frankyboy
05-31-2007, 11:10 AM
Originally posted by ElAurens:
......................

And another take is that the "blue" Luftwaffe fanboys are truely scared of the late Spits, and this same bunch, when flying in the Pacific generaly fly Allied (wierd huh?), and again want no serious competetion. It's all about their precious online stats, don't you know.

............

nonsense http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif , "these" guys are flying Ki-84-Ic http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif