PDA

View Full Version : HardBall's Aircraft Viewer - Help! with data



FltLt_HardBall
09-08-2005, 09:16 PM
Hi all,

I'm poised to release the latest version of my viewer, but in the absence of an updated IL-2 Compare I'm stuck for some performance data. Can you help me?

I need some info on the following aircraft:<UL TYPE=SQUARE><LI>P-38L late with the 1720 hp engine. How much faster should it be over the standard P-38L?
<LI>Mustang Mk.III - 25lb. boost. Top speed 642 km/h. Makes it faster than the P-51D according to IL-2Compare.[/list]

I've exhausted my resources, and now I'm basically screwed.

So HELP! please. This is your chance to do something for the community. Thanks in anticipation.

FltLt_HardBall
09-08-2005, 09:16 PM
Hi all,

I'm poised to release the latest version of my viewer, but in the absence of an updated IL-2 Compare I'm stuck for some performance data. Can you help me?

I need some info on the following aircraft:<UL TYPE=SQUARE><LI>P-38L late with the 1720 hp engine. How much faster should it be over the standard P-38L?
<LI>Mustang Mk.III - 25lb. boost. Top speed 642 km/h. Makes it faster than the P-51D according to IL-2Compare.[/list]

I've exhausted my resources, and now I'm basically screwed.

So HELP! please. This is your chance to do something for the community. Thanks in anticipation.

Kuna15
09-09-2005, 12:58 AM
bump

DIRTY-MAC
09-09-2005, 03:20 AM
Hi
you should check up the Tempests top speed to,
I think it was almost about 100km/h to slow in the latest version of Aircraft veiwer,
Icefire should be able to give you good info on it http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

WOLFMondo
09-09-2005, 04:47 AM
The Tempest is a difficult one cause the external model could be either a IIB or a IIC powered version or Oleg could have modelled the FM as a series I with a IIA engine as some suspect but even then its way to slow. Top speed on the deck should be around 397mph, 411mph at 6000ft and 438mph at 17,500ft and 408mph at 32,000ft for a series I with a IIA. IIB and IIC's should be marginally better as they offered more HP and had fully enclosed guns in the wings leading edge giving slightly better aerodynamics and also used 11 and 13lbs boost.

FltLt_HardBall
09-09-2005, 06:00 AM
Data on the Tempest came from IL2 Compare.

tigertalon
09-09-2005, 12:59 PM
Here is something:

http://www.spitfireperformance.com/mustang/fx953.html

It's basicaly this, hope it helps:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v662/aegeeaddict/MustangIIIspeed.jpg

FltLt_HardBall
09-09-2005, 04:33 PM
Hey that's cool. Thanks, mate http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

I was a bit light on Spitfire data, too so that's a big help. Cheers.

DIRTY-MAC
09-12-2005, 06:00 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by FltLt_HardBall:
Data on the Tempest came from IL2 Compare. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

But it is still very wrong.
does anybody know what model of the Tempest we are going to get?