View Full Version : Why so many people crying over everything

11-19-2011, 10:00 AM
I really want know why so many people are crying about every little thing wrong with this game or many others. It's a great game and I too also got very very very mad at first at the mutiplayer but that was because I was a low lv and now that I am a higher lv and have more powers. I actually started winning now and this games is super fun. Just takes some time getting use to the new compass. I haven't even played all the modes yet. Most of them are very good.
It's just now people with high level have a bigger advantage in ACR than in ACB. if your a higher lv than the others. But once you level up you get the powers they had and it gets even
So I ask everyone to play this great game and enjoy it.

11-19-2011, 10:02 AM
I hate these threads ten times more than the threads of people complaining. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

Btw, Multiplayer forum (http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/frm/f/2361024388).

11-19-2011, 02:34 PM
I hate the Boston bruins 10x more than I hate this thread. Even though i preferred them to win over Vancouver in the finals.

I'm a Washington fan, in case you were wondering.

11-19-2011, 03:56 PM
A person who doesn't complain or talk about a games' mistakes/problems makes them a fanboy. If you are a fan of a video game, then you will find flaws in it, and want that certain game to be improved, so that in the future, you can play it without having a problem with it.

11-19-2011, 03:56 PM
I'm actually a Vancouver fan >_> (Luongo is amazing)

but what happens, monarcas, is that when a game comes out, people who would usually never post on the forum flood to here to vent their frustration at some tiny aspect of the game that they consider to be a deal breaker or to post spoilers. The voice of the negative is always louder than the positive, as they say. Most regulars here just leave the forum around the release since the haters will probably post about 20 posts in a month, and then move on. Then acceptable criticism usually starts with gamers who really analyze the game instead of angst-typing

11-19-2011, 05:05 PM
I'm crying over everything because this series is way too emotional

...Oh, you weren't asking literally. Nevermind. Carry on.

11-19-2011, 05:27 PM
They're just mad that it's not AC1.

11-19-2011, 07:35 PM
Originally posted by xCr0wnedNorris:
They're just mad that it's not AC1.

i don't want ac1 with it flaws.... i want acR with what ac1 had good and acR don't.

The things ac1 had good are things that should never been taken out of the franchise... sadly, ppl keep thinking that i don't like some of the new features when all i say is that they are good features but some are just not well balanced... Ac1 was balanced, why can't ubisoft balance the current features? Infinity Ward did it in Mw2 -> Mw3 why couldn't ubisoft do it AcB -> AcR?....

I just hope they do balance this sh!t out between AcR -> AcR...

11-19-2011, 08:30 PM
Luongo is a bum.
<span class="flash-video"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"
><param name="wmode"
></param><param name="allowScriptAccess"
></param><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4WNdaGCAjx0?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"
/><param value="true"
/><param value="always"
/><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

11-19-2011, 08:37 PM
I agree, AC1 was more balanced. There was nothing in that game that didn't fit it.

11-19-2011, 09:33 PM
I don't see the bruins goalie with a gold olympic medal, now do I? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif

11-19-2011, 10:34 PM
Do you know what Infinity Ward did? They created the same game three times.

11-19-2011, 11:06 PM
Originally posted by d1sturbedme_468:
I don't see the bruins goalie with a gold olympic medal, now do I? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/59.gif
No, you see him with the silver medal, the Stanley Cup, The Vezina Trophy, and the best stats for any goalie for the entire season and playoffs. All while being well over 30 years old and coming off of hip surgery. Not too mention we won the Stanley with little offensive production and an inept powerplay, basically meaning he was the biggest reason we won the Stanley.

I'll take all that over a gold medal any day. 90% percent of people participating in the Olympics (for hockey) are people who weren't good enough to make the NHL anyway. And the teams that consist of most NHL players are Canada and USA and what do you know, they won gold and silver respectivelty. Oh and by the way, how many games did Timmy Thomas actually even play in the Olympics like 2, if that. We probably would have taken the gold if they had statred Timmy.

Oh and just for the record, Timmy is a humble, generous, blue collar, hard working guy. Not some arrogant jerk who thinks he's all that (and isn't) like Luongo.

Take that. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_razz.gif

11-19-2011, 11:11 PM
Well we all know what this thread is going to see next, and that is the lock http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif