View Full Version : Incendiary loadout needed for US bombers

12-26-2004, 04:32 PM
US heavy bombers require an incendiary loadout. Even if proper bombs are too much trouble, give them a larger load of the same type used on the Betty.


12-26-2004, 04:32 PM
US heavy bombers require an incendiary loadout. Even if proper bombs are too much trouble, give them a larger load of the same type used on the Betty.


12-26-2004, 04:35 PM
b29 had them i think, dunno about others.
we need inceduries for our lancaster too http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif. oh no wait, we dont have a lancaster http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/cry.gif

12-26-2004, 05:34 PM
The US had various incendiaries bombs, some shared with the RAF. The 4lb stick bomb was used by both the RAF, and USAAF in the ETO. The RAF usually used a heavier load of incendiaries to HE compared to the US (we usually had some in the mix, however).

Also, US bomb loads were just as likely to be mixed as other planes in game, not all the same bomb as is in now.


12-27-2004, 12:30 AM
wanna bomb some civilian targets in japan or in germany?? hehe

12-27-2004, 09:01 AM
Military targets as well. Area bombing was effective in doing that. It was also brutally effective at killing people in Japan, and less so (by about an order of magnitude) in Germany.

Regardless, even daylight attacks at strategic targets were usually bombed by bombers armed with mixed loads of HE and incendiaries as SOP (more HE for the US, more incendiaries for the RAF)


12-27-2004, 09:12 AM
didnt know that, thought they used gp bombs 90% + of the time

raf used them to help mark the target

12-27-2004, 06:06 PM
Yes, they are very much missed.
For the sake of realism and history.

Please, include incendriary bombs for the Luftwaffe, USAF and RAF.

Thank You

12-28-2004, 09:58 PM
First fix loadouts. B-25 and A-20 are missing 2000lb each http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-mad.gif

12-28-2004, 10:47 PM
isnt max load of b25 3000lb's?

12-29-2004, 01:28 AM
The SBD needs 100s on the wings. Just replace the 500s with 100s since it was impossible for a SBD to carry 500s on the wings.


12-29-2004, 01:54 AM
well there also needs to br fragmentation bombs (cluster bombs) on the P-47D-27.

I'm all for fixing the bomb load outs...
but 1st we really need more bombers and that ain't gonna happen i'm afraid. Even more so for the USAAF side. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

12-29-2004, 11:56 AM
well u got b25 and a20 flyable
with ai b17,24,29

that said im mystified by the lack of other b25 varients flyable (a20 is being worked on i think)


that big barrel thing is a cookie. heard of blockbuster for films? well that came from the cookie http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif later ones came in 8000lb and 12000lb sizes too http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

and this shows the bombs lanc could carry


thats probably not *every* type of bomb it took either.

near double the bombload of a b17/b24 to the same target. also to targets the 8af wouldnt goto until late war...

oh and powered by no less than 4 merlins http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif


some brief reading, find out that while missing ameribombers are sad, that missing lancaster is a tradigy http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/cry.gif