XyZspineZyX

09-21-2003, 10:21 PM

Come on Oleg were so close yet no cigar/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

Ive been doing some simple math calculations and heres what i come up with \using IL2-compare

If we use the 24m/s climb of the LA7 than we can work out the climbs of the other planes too.

What I did is make some simple numbers to show the power to weight ratios.I take empty weight and divide by max horsepower and I come up with numbers such as

la7-1.4

G10-1.3

E4--1.6

Now using the spot on accurate sealevel speeds in IL2-C and divide by the power/weight ratio number from above calculations....then I didved by magic (18) and it comes up with 24 for the LA7...which is what IL2-C has for LA7

G10 you get 25m/s not the 19 in il2-c

E4 is 16m/s compared to 18 in il2-c

K4 is 24m/s instead of Il2-c at 19m/s

now oleg is gonna take away 150kg from the 109's giving

G10 at 27m/s

E4 at 17,4m/s

K4 at 25.5m/s

These seem very close to what these planes were suposed to have in relation to the LA7's

BUT this wont help out since he equates the climb numbers different for every plane

If you use my equation you get an IL2 at 10m/s instead of the 15.5m/s that IL2C has showing....come on it shouldnt climb like this and if maddox uses this simple way of calculating,than all planes will climb more proportionate to..... MAX SPEED,HORSEPOWER AND WEIGHT OF PLANES

I also notice this....every listed rate of climb is hit upon at 0 alt only when plane is using 100% power.You go way wacky when yougo too 110%

The LA7 is at 30m/s at 0 alt when 100 percent power has it at the listed 24...THIS SUCKS/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

WHY OH WHY??!?!?!

VOW forum has guys testing and fidning that the LA7 hit 5000M at 3.45 and not the 4.5 in object viewer.I bet if you run engine at 100 percent instead of full power youll hit the claimed 4.5

Message Edited on 09/21/0305:26PM by Wolfstriked

Ive been doing some simple math calculations and heres what i come up with \using IL2-compare

If we use the 24m/s climb of the LA7 than we can work out the climbs of the other planes too.

What I did is make some simple numbers to show the power to weight ratios.I take empty weight and divide by max horsepower and I come up with numbers such as

la7-1.4

G10-1.3

E4--1.6

Now using the spot on accurate sealevel speeds in IL2-C and divide by the power/weight ratio number from above calculations....then I didved by magic (18) and it comes up with 24 for the LA7...which is what IL2-C has for LA7

G10 you get 25m/s not the 19 in il2-c

E4 is 16m/s compared to 18 in il2-c

K4 is 24m/s instead of Il2-c at 19m/s

now oleg is gonna take away 150kg from the 109's giving

G10 at 27m/s

E4 at 17,4m/s

K4 at 25.5m/s

These seem very close to what these planes were suposed to have in relation to the LA7's

BUT this wont help out since he equates the climb numbers different for every plane

If you use my equation you get an IL2 at 10m/s instead of the 15.5m/s that IL2C has showing....come on it shouldnt climb like this and if maddox uses this simple way of calculating,than all planes will climb more proportionate to..... MAX SPEED,HORSEPOWER AND WEIGHT OF PLANES

I also notice this....every listed rate of climb is hit upon at 0 alt only when plane is using 100% power.You go way wacky when yougo too 110%

The LA7 is at 30m/s at 0 alt when 100 percent power has it at the listed 24...THIS SUCKS/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

WHY OH WHY??!?!?!

VOW forum has guys testing and fidning that the LA7 hit 5000M at 3.45 and not the 4.5 in object viewer.I bet if you run engine at 100 percent instead of full power youll hit the claimed 4.5

Message Edited on 09/21/0305:26PM by Wolfstriked